On 2023-04-20 at 10:47:15 UTC-0400 (Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:47:15 -0400)
Lance Lovette via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
There's a rational basis for an exception for 5xx before MAIL FROM,
when the target only has the connection parameters and HELO
name to use as a basis for rejection
Unfor
On 2023-04-17 at 03:54:37 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:54:37 +0100)
Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 17 April 2023 03:08:29 Lance Lovette via Exim-users
wrote:
How might I configure my routers to ignore an initial 5xx response
from the
first router and attempt another
On 2023-03-29 at 04:46:17 UTC-0400 (Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:46:17 +0200)
Kirill Miazine via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Exactly. The former preventing passive data collection, the later --
active. Still, if *I* were to state a legal requirement that certain
domains use TLS, I'd also ask for
On 2022-12-05 at 11:00:21 UTC-0500 (Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:00:21 +)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 05/12/2022 15:38, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
If you use relaxed instead of relaxed/relaxed, the unspecified body
canonicalization is "simple" which is
On 2022-12-05 at 00:46:07 UTC-0500 (Mon, 5 Dec 2022 05:46:07 +)
Victor Sudakov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
I guess there's also the dkim canonicalisation. Mine was
relaxed/relaxed. Yours?
dkim_canon = relaxed
There's your probl
On 2022-11-30 at 08:39:47 UTC-0500 (Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:39:47 -0700)
The Doctor via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:38:19AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:48 PM The Doctor via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
Any known issue
On 2022-11-29 at 18:39:49 UTC-0500 (Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:39:49 +1000)
Adam Nielsen via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi all,
I'm running into an issue with the way Exim 4.94.2 invokes
SpamAssassin (SA).
I have added some custom rules to SA, however when Exim invokes it, my
custom rules a
On 2022-09-19 at 08:14:46 UTC-0400 (Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:14:46 +0200)
Lasse Törngren via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello Jeremy,
OK, I understand. Sad from my point of view, as this means that I will
never be able to upgrade Exim from now on?
(Unless I pinpoint the bug myself.)
On 2022-08-09 at 20:20:36 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Aug 2022 01:20:36 +0100)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Tricky to guess at. Turn off more features, I guess.
You already tried chunking. Next would be fastopen, then pipelining.
However, given it was right after all the data (
On 2022-06-22 at 11:19:00 UTC-0400 (Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:00 -0400)
Robert Steinmetz via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
I do not have any IPv6 records so no IPv6 address should be included.
The existence of DNS records has no effect on whether Exim (or probably
any MTA) will use a part
On 2022-05-31 at 14:33:19 UTC-0400 (Tue, 31 May 2022 20:33:19 +0200)
Tim Jackson via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
I have some legitimate-looking hosts from a major bank producing log
lines like this when attempting incoming connections to a public MX:
TLS error on connection from r209.
On 2022-05-31 at 09:28:38 UTC-0400 (Tue, 31 May 2022 15:28:38 +0200)
Kamil Jońca via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
I have some instances, which generates mail from stdin
(ie something like "echo bla|mail root")
and recently I found that there exists additional empty line in such
emails, i
On 2022-05-31 at 07:40:00 UTC-0400 (Tue, 31 May 2022 13:40:00 +0200)
Heiko Schlichting via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
I see the good intention of enforcing RFCs, but it should be limited
to things that really make sense and not enforce otherworldly limits.
I generally agree with the
On 2022-05-22 at 05:47:12 UTC-0400 (Sun, 22 May 2022 10:47:12 +0100)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
> On 22/05/2022 10:30, Axel Rau via Exim-users wrote:
>> So it is a standard FreeBSD ports installation and therefor not setuid root.
>
> If that is standard for FreeBSD
It
On 2022-05-21 at 12:41:27 UTC-0400 (Sat, 21 May 2022 18:41:27 +0200)
Axel Rau via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Am 21.05.2022 um 16:43 schrieb Bill Cole via Exim-users
:
What are the *full literal* log entries? They should include the name
and PID of the process which had the problem
On 2022-05-21 at 06:38:48 UTC-0400 (Sat, 21 May 2022 12:38:48 +0200)
Axel Rau via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
> Recently my mailman 3 servers began spamming with tons of such log messages:
>
> cannot accept message: failed to stat log directory /var/spool/exim/log:
> Permission denied
[.
On 2022-05-13 at 02:59:41 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 May 2022 23:59:41 -0700)
AC via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
What configuration within exim defines how the outbound From header is
formatted?
Hopefully, none. There's a long tradition of MTA (e.g. Exim, Postfix,
Sendmail) configurations bei
On 2022-05-10 at 09:34:14 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 May 2022 08:34:14 -0500)
Martin McCormick via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
I also tried
openssl s_client -connect smtp.suddenlink.net:465 -starttls=smtp
That gets you:
Didn't find STARTTLS in server response, trying a
On 2022-02-13 at 12:48:52 UTC-0500 (Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:48:52 +0300)
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:48:33PM +0200, Victor Ustugov via
Exim-users wrote:
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote on 19.11.2021 09:16:
...
There are several var
On 2022-01-29 at 05:26:21 UTC-0500 (Sat, 29 Jan 2022 10:26:21 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
On 2022-01-27 at 14:31:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:31:41 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim
On 2022-01-27 at 14:31:41 UTC-0500 (Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:31:41 +
(GMT))
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
- What do you think about implementing re-folding headers to make
mail RFC-compliant again
On 2022-01-12 at 10:02:57 UTC-0500 (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:02:57 +0300)
Dmitriy Matrosov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
Is it possible to re-route certain mails on the primary server (with
lowest MX priority)
to the secondary (the one with highest priority)?
No. That's not what s
On 2021-11-18 at 17:16:14 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:16:14 +)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in
an Exim-written Received header when a SMTP
On 2021-11-18 at 09:53:38 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:53:38 -0500)
Matt Corallo via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its
incorrect.
I do not think that anyone involved with the SA project said anything
Exim did was "incorrect." If
On 2021-11-16 at 17:03:14 UTC-0500 (Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:03:14 +0300)
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users
wrote:
The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar
expansion
here is that the
On 2021-10-31 at 13:36:24 UTC-0400 (Sun, 31 Oct 2021 23:06:24 +0530)
Sherin A via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hello,
>
> The localhost usually don't have dns. It only have the ip entry in
> /etc/hosts file which is not resolved by the resolver in /etc/resolv.conf .
> I changed it t
On 2021-08-22 at 17:31:44 UTC-0400 (Sun, 22 Aug 2021 17:31:44 -0400)
Gary Dale via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Here's the session, starting with the command and including entire
output (only my customer's domain name has been removed)
The full credentials for that account have been ex
On 2021-06-22 at 07:45:35 UTC-0400 (Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:45:35 +0200)
Yves Goergen via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I've set up my mail server with Exim so that it obeys the restrictions
in RFC 8301. That means that DKIM signatures with SHA-1 hashing or
keys shorter than 1024 bi
On 28 Apr 2021, at 9:22, SysAdmin EM via Exim-users wrote:
Could you tell me how to solve the problem? or what documentation to
read?
You need to fix whatever is generating the mail so that it stops sending
mail with such long lines. The most reliable way to do that is simply to
make it use
On 21 Apr 2021, at 15:37, Wayne via Exim-users wrote:
Does this include lines in the body of the messages or just the
headers?
Both. See RFC5322 Section 2.1.1. MTAs can safely fix over-long header
lines by folding them, but to fix a body with over-long lines, they'd
need to either modify the
On 21 Apr 2021, at 17:39, Wayne via Exim-users wrote:
Then I assume the body is being signed implicitly no matter what
headers
are selected?
Yes. A DKIM signature technically signs a selected set of headers and of
a hash of the body, both in a canonicalized form. Without the body hash,
it w
On 11 Mar 2021, at 15:59, Olaf Hopp (SCC) via Exim-users wrote:
Dear collegues,
my administration writes one(!) email with more than 3000 receipients
in the envelope. (Please, no discussion about the sense of this.
Period.)
Receiving that mail takes about 2 two hours.
Delivering that mail is
On 3 Feb 2021, at 10:12, Gary Stainburn via Exim-users wrote:
I am experiencing problems when trying to deliver to Google's email
servers.
My emails are timing out while trying to send.
The first thing to check before trying to persuade Google to change is
to make sure you are NOT using an
On 29 Dec 2020, at 7:38, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Am 29.12.20 um 12:03 schrieb Victor Sudakov via Exim-users:
I can't imagine how to produce such
behaviour with socket API.
Neither do I. Moreover, the problem began after upgrading the OS from
FreeBSD 11 to 12.2-RELEASE-p1, and exim to
After Jeremy pointed out that they didn't even try STARTTLS, I looked
closer and noticed something odd...
On 22 Sep 2020, at 12:10, Christian Eyrich via Exim-users wrote:
Thing is that my mail server does support STARTTLS and also advertises
this which I verify in the Exim debug log and was a
On 22 Sep 2020, at 12:10, Christian Eyrich via Exim-users wrote:
Hi,
a few weeks ago the GMX mail servers stopped sending mails to my
server.
The GMX mailer daemon writes:
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
its recipients. This is a permanent error. The
On 31 Aug 2020, at 15:18, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
I think its better to do it like this:
add_header = Keywords: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=9A=A0=EF=B8=8F External Mail - be
careful of attachments and links!?=
That will add a nice banner on top of the email with the information
instead.
Or
On 4 Mar 2020, at 4:06, Graham McAlister via Exim-users wrote:
I have successfully set up DKIM using rsa keys, but am having issues
with ed25519 keys.
Using an ed25519 key I get
DKIM: signing failed: RSA_PRIVKEY
in the exim log. As I said, RSA key works.
What version of Exim are you using and
On 25 Feb 2020, at 10:12, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
If I check your mail.lucabert.de, I see a multiline response already
*before* your server has any idea, if the client would understand it.
I wouldn't expect all mailclients understanding and handling this
well.
This has been
On 4 Nov 2019, at 10:13, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:21, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
On 04/11/2019 10:43, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
root@gw:/usr/local/SRC/Exim/exim-4.92 # pwd
/usr/local/SRC/Exim/exim-4.92
On 7 Sep 2019, at 7:10, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
On 7 Sep 2019, at 11:13, Cyborg via Exim-users
wrote:
The question is, what is the reality?
Nobody really knows.
The fact that Exim is/was the default MTA in a couple of distros means
there’s an awful lot of systems running it out
On 14 Jul 2019, at 22:18, necktwi via Exim-users wrote:
From my mac mail client I've connected to remote exim+dovecot server.
Since few weeks back I was not able to send mail but able to receive.
exim in /var/log/messages says:
Jul 14 15:22:15 RPi3B exim[3576]: 2019-07-14 20:52:15 dovecot_plai
On 15 Jul 2019, at 6:41, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 15/07/2019 03:18, necktwi via Exim-users wrote:
From my mac mail client I've connected to remote exim+dovecot server.
Since few weeks back I was not able to send mail but able to receive.
[...]
I'm slightly confused by the quest
On 25 Jun 2019, at 9:03, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
PS: I do not need an additional copy of list emails. I get
very tired of getting them. If your MUA does not have
a "reply to list" button, please get a better one.
I swear, I'm going to start deliberately ignoring any
On 6 Jun 2019, at 8:25, Spencer Marshall via Exim-users wrote:
why is this only being applied to +local_domains? why not everything?
denymessage = Restricted characters in address
local_parts = ^[.] : ^.*[\$@%!/|]
$, /, |, and % are all perfectly legal characters i
On 16 Apr 2019, at 5:18, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
HOWEVER: I don’t think this is advisable, as you could break DKIM
signing if the over-long header is included in the signature.
Because header folding is a permissible in-flight message modification
per RFC822 & its successors, the
On 24 Mar 2019, at 3:40, jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users wrote:
So, again, please excuse me -- this is a generic legal question, not
(only) related to exim.
As described, not AT ALL related to Exim, as Exim does not implement the
functionality you are asking about.
Maybe you should ask ask l
On 15 Mar 2019, at 14:35, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
On 15/03/2019 14:54, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 15/03/2019 14:36, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
Does the use of a CNAME in this case violate an RFC?
I've not looked hard to find one. The original RFC
for SRV doesn't me
On 5 Mar 2019, at 9:10, Ryan McClung via Exim-users wrote:
Why use only 465 and not 587? Just curious there.
Or why not every port between 400 and 1? :)
The way daemons on ports 465 and 587 can be expected to behave are
defined in IETF RFCs 6409 and 8314. If you want your mail system to
On 4 Mar 2019, at 9:27, jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users wrote:
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users :
What directive you're talking about?
Sorry, forgot to mention this -- I meant
squirrel/config/config_local.php +=
define('hide_squirrelmail_header', 1);
Ok, but this doesn't explain the exis
On 3 Mar 2019, at 11:10, jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users wrote:
Hi there,
above all, thanks for being able to join this board!
Well, I have an account on a ubuntu webserver, running exim4 as
sendmail
replacement. And,
I want to prevent exim from sending out the "X-Relay-User" header
line.
On 19 Jan 2019, at 9:46, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
You asked this question on a mailing list. Some mailing lists
don't alter envelope-from, so you'd not receive your own messages
back from such mailing lists.
The implementation of mailing lists by transparent forwarding (e.g. what
you'd g
On 16 Jan 2019, at 15:03, jpff via Exim-users wrote:
I am sure I a being obtuse here but I run exim on my firewall
computer which for historical reasons runs Debian. I am in the
process of upgrading to Stretch but I cannot build exim. I rather
like to have my own build as (a) Debian lag
On 28 Nov 2018, at 1:59, Sebastian Nielsen via Exim-users wrote:
How can I reliably cut subjects that are too long, without breaking
for example quoted-printable encodings and such?
Ergo, if the subject line exceeds X characters (where X characters are
a limit I as system administrator decides)
On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:30, David Cunningham via Exim-users wrote:
Hi All,
All bounce-backs have an envelope from of <>.
Yes, they do. Using the null sender for MTA-generated messages has been
part of the SMTP standard forever. It is not optional. It is not a
matter of choice. A server which
On 26 May 2018, at 16:14, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
Your main problem will be deciding when to do this.
Date/time formats are notoriously fluid.
Thankfully, this should not be a problem in identifying bad date
headers, since the *correct* format for a date header in mail is very
na
56 matches
Mail list logo
