On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Has anyone in here tried Exim with dbmail?
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/debian:exim4
The goal is
1°) to have email users in a SQL database
2°) have an MTA + MDA (Exim4)
3°) have a POP + IMAP server (OT here, but I'll
expected:
###
Warning! Invalid configuration file for exim. Exitingfailed.
Regards,
Brian Blood
ECMSquared.com
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http
;mail.log =
Regards,
Brian Blood
ECMSquared.com
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On Jul 24, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Shalom Levytam wrote:
I apologize for this newbie message but I need some help with exim and my
host doesn't seem to have the answer.
I send a daily newsletter of 29,000 messages. Unfortunately, exim is sending
out mail at approximately 1000 messages an
on
a different port on localhost only and then all your queueing is handled by
this completely separate process. You do have to watch out for some possible
configs where you end up with a loop, but you have to try hard to make that
happen.
My $0.02
Regards,
Brian Blood
ECMSquared.com
On May 10, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Frank Heydlauf wrote:
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:49:03PM -0500, Brian Blood wrote:
Our email solution, ECMSquared.com (Exim, Courier, MySQL) stores all
configuration information:
...
and our exim config logs all ips with stats: RDNS, helo, proper QUITs, bytes
On May 6, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Ron White wrote:
I'm looking at the concept of creating a message log database which
contains one line for each message that my Exim sees.
At this point I'm mostly guessing, but I suspect in the my various ACL
'drop' or 'deny' statements I could probably add
On Apr 28, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
We have a requirement for a mail server (SMTP receive, POP
collection,
IMAP not currently required) with a presence in 2 data centres
Without having thought this out entirely, a database, say Mysql,
placed
on shared storage available
On May 5, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Dean Brooks wrote:
Does anyone other than Bill have an opinion? I still contend that
there
is no disadvantage to doing it. Unless you're actually mad enough to
think that adding 4KB of useful code, is equivalent to, bloat.
Every single one of my Exim
On Apr 30, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Chump Chumpster wrote:
When we send out a newsletter to our subscribers, it tends to slow
down our
regular email from clients on our domain. I have other stand alone
servers I
could use as MTAs to share the burden when there's a spike in
demand. Due to
I was trying to do a simple find/replace operation on a header and ran
into an issue.
The solution might help others and perhaps there would be a better way
to solve.
So. I'm sharing
Our system allows the system admin to define a string template for how
the Subject header in Spam
On Oct 27, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
I don't see the harm in making the change Brian asks for -- it will
It's a change of behaviour. strict_acl_vars was introduced to protect
against typos, like Perl's use strict. If there is a use case for
such
a check, it should be done
On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
My particular use is the following:
We have the ability in our solution to allow per message max message
size and that value is set in a acl_m variable.
This value is made use of in our local user transport like so:
message_size_limit
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:23 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
acl_ variables aren't defined in the message generated by the
autoreply transport driver
Nor can they be.
The router/transport chain has ONLY read-access to acl_m variables.
I didn't say they weren't readable/writable, I'm saying they
On Oct 27, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Brian Blood wrote:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:23 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
acl_ variables aren't defined in the message generated by the
autoreply transport driver
Nor can they be.
The router/transport chain has ONLY read-access to acl_m variables.
I didn't say
Logically speaking should exim have a problem with this:
${if def:acl_m_pref_msg_maxsize}
when acl_m_pref_msg_maxsize has not been defined and
strict_acl_vars=true???
if I'm bothering to check if the variable is defined aren't I working
within the spirit of what strict_acl_vars is trying
On Oct 25, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Ted Cooper wrote:
Logically speaking should exim have a problem with this:
${if def:acl_m_pref_msg_maxsize}
when acl_m_pref_msg_maxsize has not been defined and
strict_acl_vars=true???
if I'm bothering to check if the variable is defined aren't I working
Took a bit of debugging and strange router construction (can we please
get logwrite to somehow be called inside a router), but I wanted to
document what I found in relation to what happens to $address_data
during routing, redirects and child routing.
I had very specific use case and the
I'm reworking our exim config and was trying to eliminate/optimize
some lookups and wanted a 2nd (or more opinion) on the tack I'm
taking
The basic premise is making my list of routers utilize information
I've already picked up in the acl phase (is sender local, is recip
local).
I'm
I've seen it as: smtp_notquit_acl and acl_smtp_notquit
in the 4.69 pdf and the website
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html#toc0310
which is it?
Regards,
Brian Blood
Me: http://www.networkjack.info/
Biz: http://www.macserve.net/
--
## List details at http
You want to add a router like this:
copy_to_local_sender:
driver = redirect
check_ancestor
qualify_preserve_domain
data = ${if match_domain{$sender_address}{+my_local_domainlist}}
unseen
You will want to add some extra security on this as the test in data
I'm aware of alternatives/workarounds to what I'm requesting, so no
need to rehash them
I would like to see a variable in exim that reflects the actual rDNS
value for sender_host_address.
Properly I think sender_host_name should have that value and there
should be a new variable,
On Aug 4, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
My issue is at the end of make during the linking process:
cc -o exim
/usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: Undefined symbols:
_SSL_CTX_set_info_callback
_EVP_sha256
_BIO_set_flags
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: ***
On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Renaud Allard schrieb:
Tom Kistner wrote:
Renaud Allard schrieb:
/usr/local/lib/libdkim.a(dkimsign.o)(.text+0x103): In function
`CDKIMSign::CDKIMSign[not-in-charge]()':
: undefined reference to `EVP_sha256'
OK, then that OpenSSL was
On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'll use myself as an example. I am in the front end spam filtering
business. (http://www.junkemailfilter.com) I have about 4000 domains
pointed to a single Exim server. Email comes in - I filter it - and I
send the good email on to the
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko wrote:
I was wondering whether it is possible to organise the log writing
within the exim, so that logs related to abc.com domain emails
would go
to a file exim_main-abc.com.log and logs related to def.com domain
would
end up in
On Jun 11, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Sander Smeenk wrote:
One big fat tip for you, free of charge:
Exim is not good at dealing with large queues, partly because of
the way
it keeps state in the db4 file. That's why almost all these platforms
have their spool in memory and 'message logging' is
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
What makes you think that Postfix is faster than Exim? Have you
tested it?
In short, yes.
My opinion is based on over ten years of developing/managing sites/
systems that put out a LOT of email. As in tens of thousands per run
on a daily
On Mar 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Brian Blood wrote:
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
What makes you think that Postfix is faster than Exim? Have you
tested it?
In short, yes.
My opinion is based on over ten years of developing/managing sites/
systems
On Feb 29, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Ken Price wrote:
The MTA has to be able to receive 50k/second in bursts and get
them out
as quick as possible. Probably not as fast as coming in but from
what I
understand delivery speed is important.
It's coming from some sort of SQL server that they say
On Feb 11, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Can exim be persuaded to log directly to a SQL database?
The exim-centered email solution we've built logs pretty much
everything to a sql database, which is then accessible through the
web admin.
the biggies in our logging tables:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:21 PM, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
.include /etc/exim/host/${primary_hostname}.conf
For the clients who we deploy our exim solution to, we have a primary
configuration file that is generic and a hostspecific.conf file.
Most controls for various features that are
exim 4.66
assuming this:
set acl_c_pref_av_run = 1
set acl_m_msg_av_allowed = true
this:
condition = ${if and {{$acl_c_pref_av_run}
{$acl_m_msg_av_allowed}} {true}{false}}
is giving me the following error:
${if and {{$acl_c_pref_av_run}{$acl_m_msg_av_allowed}} {true}
{false}}:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Dean Brooks wrote:
Exim's expansion syntax is not a programming language.
Could have fooled me! :-)
IFs, ANDs, ORs, and now FORANY and FORALL, oh my!!
I sure as heck treat it/push it like a programming language.
It's just
a set of string expansion
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Dave Pooser wrote:
An extremely high percentage of spambots sends MAIL FROM:
instead
of MAIL FROM:.
I've seen that test FP for me a few times-- most recently on an
automated
invoice-mailing system using Blat 1.9.4 (an open-source Windows
command-line
On Nov 17, 2006, at 1:03 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
I currently have this ACL for my primary hostname.
# HELO is my hostname
dropmessage = REJECTED - Bad HELO - Host impersonating
[$sender_helo_name]
any ip doing this gets automatically added to our blacklisted_hosts
mysql table with
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Lugo wrote:
Maybe that acl should carry some interrogatable status with it that
denotes the nature of the end of conversation, rather than
having one
specifically for the different cases, then you can conditionalise
things
with it.
That would make
On Nov 14, 2006, at 4:25 AM, Christoph Purrucker wrote:
accept
hosts = 192.168.1.0/24 : 10.0.0.0/8 : host1.domain.com :
host2.example.com : *.ebay.com : *.amazon.com
This works very well for me. But the whole rest of my server is
configured
in mysql tables (local domains, user
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting Marc Perkel:
I was just wondering if there were known MTAs that don't try all MX
records but only the lowest? Is this something that's common?
I guess by lowest, you mean the lowest preference number, i.e. the
highest priority.
FYI,
We are seeing this rule be VERY effective with no FPs so far after 36
hours in operation.
And it's a VERY light weight test.
Perhaps SMTP command syntax checking could become a built-in option
for exim.
Brian
On Nov 5, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
An extremely high
40 matches
Mail list logo
