At 10:57 PM on Sunday 9 April 2023, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I hope one day exim-4.96 will make it into the ports, but I did not have to
> wait.
There's some work on updating the port to 4.96 here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265098
Regards,
Davi
ill use that instead.
Thanks,
David Siebörger
$ git clone -q git://git.exim.org/exim.git
$ cd exim/src
$ mkdir Local
$ cp src/EDITME Local/Makefile
$ echo CC=cc >> Local/Makefile
$ echo EXIM_USER=mailnull >> Local/Makefile
$ make
/bin/sh scripts/source_checks
>>> Creating look
> The next Release Candidate for 4.96, RC1, is not available from
Where is it available from then ? :-)
D
lists/exim/users/2022-05-16.tx exim-users
++
| Dave Restall, Computer Anorak, Geek, Cycl
Hi,
> On 08/09/2021 09:01, David Restall via Exim-users wrote:
> > While compiling 4.95-RC2 I'm still seeing the following warnings emitted :-
> >
> > cc filter.c
> > filter.c: In function 'interpret_commands':
> > filter.c:2018:23: war
Hi,
While compiling 4.95-RC2 I'm still seeing the following warnings emitted :-
cc filter.c
filter.c: In function 'interpret_commands':
filter.c:2018:23: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer
target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
2018 | else headers_charset = s; /*XXX lose
d be added.
--
Best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi,
Where do we send 'stuff' to if we're compiling and testing Exim 4.95-RC0 ?
I'm compiling 4.95-RC0 I get the following warnings emitted :-
cc filter.c
filter.c: In function 'interpret_commands':
filter.c:2018:23: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer
target type [-Wdisc
Hi,
> On 25/05/2021 09:23, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> > What happens after 4.99 - 4.100 or 5.00 (
>
> I'm assuming 4.100
>
> No plans for an Exim version 5; that would be used for
> a "you now need to totally rework your configuration
> files, and also your mental model of How Ex
On 2020-07-03 12:30, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
today I gave Exim 4.94 a try and ran into the same problem. I must
admit that my configuration requires to run two Exim instances in
parallel. I'm executing the following two commands to start the
daemons:
[...]
I guess this is really a
Hi
is there any way to activate DSN for locally submitted messages ?
--
Thanx & best regards ...
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ol
st of all some distribution use openssl and some use gnutls.
check this with 'exim -bV'
Symbol "tls_early_post_process_client_hello" is in openssl 1.1+ library.
On 27.12.19 19:53, David Saez Padros via Exim-users wrote:
Hi
a remote server which was able to send us mail u
+no_sslv2 +no_sslv3 -no_tlsv1_1 -no_tlsv1
seems to have no effect
--
Thanx & best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## L
Hi
yes, and i found that the problem is that in local_scan.h string_copy
functions are only defined if defined(LOCAL_SCAN) ||
defined(DLFUNC_IMPL) so i had to #define LOCAL_SCAN before
including local_scan.h, after that it worked ok
On 12/12/2019 09:40, David Saez Padros via Exim-users wrote
^
--
Best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Plea
wither whatever device
> > is filtering your DNS queries. It is b0rked, and it would
> > be good to find a way to get it to stop doing that.
>
> Thanks for the analysis, Viktor.
>
> David: try adding a main-config option:
>
>dns_use_edns0 = 0
Yes! That works.
@ip)=gethostbyname("smtp.gmail.com"); print
> "n=$n\na=$a\n"; for (@ip) {($w,$x,$y,$z)=unpack('W4',$_); print
> "$w.$x.$y.$z\n"}'
This returns:
n=gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com
a=smtp.gmail.com
74.125.68.108
--
David Purton
e: dcpu
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:12:16AM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 02:31:59PM +0930, David Purton via Exim-users wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> > wrote:
> ...
> > > ( and grab
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:44:12AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users wrote:
> On 2019-07-16 15:03, David Purton wrote:
>
> > 2019-07-16 14:23:14 Start queue run: pid=12322 -qf
> > 2019-07-16 14:23:14 1hnFQ2-000379-9I no IP address found for host
> > smtp.gmail.c
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 16/07/2019 06:33, David Purton via Exim-users wrote:
> > I then sign into the network and try and run exim -qf to clear the
> > queue.
> >
> > But the logs then show:
> >
> &
ff_t: 8
Configuration file search path is
/etc/exim4/exim4.conf:/var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated
Configuration file is /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated
Thanks,
David
--
David Purton
e: dcpur...@marshwiggle.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
## List details at h
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> On 06/29/2018 08:30 PM, David Cunningham via Exim-users wrote:
>> All bounce-backs have an envelope from of <>.
>>
>> I need to be able to set this to something. I am using a smart
Hi All,
All bounce-backs have an envelope from of <>.
I need to be able to set this to something. I am using a smart host that will
not accept emails from <>. I need to to be set to postmaster or don-no-reply
or something of the like.
Thanks for any help!
--
## List details at https://lists
Apologies for delayed response; but then again you did drop me from Cc
so it's pure fluke I even saw this message at all — maybe I'm not
really sorry :)
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 12:49 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 19/07/17 12:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> >
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 11:29 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> I'm considering renaming, possibly removing, some of the support
> in the Exim sourcebase for "older" build targets. Either way,
> for any this applies to, builds will no longer work.
>
> I suspect that many of these are moribund and would
o for some
messages, leaving the existing SpamAssassin setup in place for other
traffic.
The manual page at [0] makes it sound like it is not possible call both
SpamAssassin and rspamd from the same Exim installation. Can anyone tell
me otherwise?
Thanks,
David
[0]
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-curren
Sergio gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> My exim started to show this error since this morning update.
>
> Any hint on how to solve this is appreciated.
>
> F=<> rejected by non-SMTP ACL: failed to expand ACL string "${if
> eq{$originator_uid}{${perl{user2uid}{nobody}}}{1}{0}}":
> Undefined
On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 22:09 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Felix Schwarz (Sa 07 Mai 2016 15:32:22 CEST):
> >
> > Exim supports SRS as an experimental option when used with srs_alt. Is
> > anyone
> > using that in a somewhat stable setup? Is there some plan how to deal with
> > srs_
Greetings fellow Exim users,
I have what seems like a simple issue, but I can't seem to get it quite right.
I did look in the manual, but I guess I missed the solution if it's there (and
I would not be surprised if that is so), so please bear with me if this is
indeed a case of RTFM.
I have a
netblocks) to not
> match.
>
> (This is covered in the documentation in chapter 10 section 16 and
> section 14, but it's easy to miss; I did, years ago, with similar
> effects to what you're seeing here.)
Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for and is having
CL to mean "DNS
lookup failures should be treated as a non-match for that entry in the
list". Is this possible?
Thanks,
David
--
David North | www.dnorth.net
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 07:51 +, Osborne, Paul
(paul.osbo...@canterbury.ac.uk) wrote:
>
> So when google generates the MDF it goes to mxout (as part of the
> SMTP transaction) - which then sends it round to mxin and so back to
> the beginning of the pipeline. It is all made worse by our address
Recently I've noticed a few times that I've been unable to send mail
(from my MUA) because the mail server has too many concurrent SMTP conn
ections.
This doesn't work, because it's not expanded:
smtp_accept_max = ${if eq{$interface_port}{587} {25}{20}}
Could it be? Any alternative suggestions?
Hi everbody.
On a shared web hosting server with exim4 as mail server I would like to
prevent php applications from sending mail without authentication via
SMTP on localhost.
This is a piece of war against bugged php script suffering code-injection.
So, because I run suPHP, each web applicatio
I would like to integrate :
require verify = reverse_host_lookup
as it has stopped SPAM tremendously. My concern is I have a couple users
of the system who log into their email, then send but fail this lookup
as they are on static IPs without PTRs set (I don't know why, I just
need to deal wi
Hi all,
We have a client who has a large number (1000+) of users, sending ~25,000
emails per day. Inbox turnover is high, and the way in which they work requires
the mail clients (Outlook in this case for the most part) to only download a
set number (or time period) of emails. For example, each
I have googled quite a bit and am struggling, so any help would be
appreciated.
I have a server hosting multiple domains and utilize an off-box
anti-spam solution. The current config works great.
What I need to do is inject a new router to send specific recipients to
a new version of the anti
interface_address as key too
if you prefer.
Kind regards
David
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users
[mailto:exim-users-bounces+david.angleitner=team.deep...@exim.org] Im Auftrag
von M. Piscaer
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2015 11:39
An: Exim-users@exim.org
Betreff: [exim] replacing postfix for
On 10/18/14, 1:05 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2014-10-17, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2014-10-15, mark david mcCreary wrote:
so, set the retry timeout to zero:
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-retry_configuration.html
I've never tried tr write an empty retry rule, perha
Hi
Use port 587 for smtp auth and port 25 for incoming mail and apply
different rules to each port
Hi All,
I need to limit incoming smtp mail connections and defer
additional smtp connections whenever we have a peak of mail / spam. I
want to do this without limiting smtp auth connections
I would like give Exim a message to deliver to a remote host, and get
notified if Exim received a 4xx - Temporary Delay.
That is, if the messages is delivered successfully or bounces (5xx),
that is fine.
But I don't want messages sitting on the queue because there was a
temporary error. I w
ith
> uschar *param_value = string_copy(US"");
>
This didn't work for me. The attached patch seems OK so far...
Cheers
David
--- mime.c 2014-08-09 13:44:29.0 +0100
+++ mime.c.new 2014-09-01 07:41:50.0 +0100
@@ -597,15 +597,16 @@
mp < &mim
Hi
Yes, i can also switch off the server or not run exim at all, both
of them will work well
On 17/06/14 08:56, David Saez Padros wrote:
connection limit reached for all hosts
Don't use serialize_hosts ?
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
Hi
Is there any way to avoid logging the message "connection limit reached
for all hosts" ? i tried with -skip_delivery but it does not avoid
loggin it
--
Best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.
I'm trying to add /etc/aliases processing for simple forwarding
for virtual users to Ubuntu's default configuration.
For example, for a host with 100s of domains, forward
some virtual user to gmail...
f...@example.com: d...@gmail.com
Seems like this should be simple as matching an address th
ting the latest
improvements to my spam filtering [1], I thought it was worth mentioning
here. All feedback gratefully received.
Thanks,
David
[0] https://bitbucket.org/davidnorth/eximunit
[1]
https://www.dnorth.net/2014/03/28/blocking-executable-files-even-buried-inside-zips-in-exim/
--
Dav
them on
a course, if one is available.
thanks
David
--
David Osborne
Senior Systems Development Officer
Systems and Security Team, Information Services
University of Nottingham
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please us
On 15/12/13 02:17, Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2013-12-14, David North wrote:
>>
>> I stuck with it and came up with a solution - replace the dnslookup
>> router with two like so (most of the router options omitted for brevity):
>
>
>> ignore_target_hosts
On 14/12/13 17:03, David North wrote:
> I ran into a problem earlier today sending mail from my phone via Exim 4
> on my server.
>
> My phone has a randomly chosen IPv6 address (within my /64) thanks to
> IPv6's privacy features. The phone's IP has no reverse DNS. It rela
ld do it in a programming language of my choice invoked via
transport_filter, but I'd rather not involve a separate process in this
stage of delivery.
Thanks,
David
--
David North | http://www.dnorth.net
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Hi
An implementation of RFC 3462 (MIME formatted bounces) would indeed be an
improvement over the status quo. At the moment it is embarassing that
Exim still uses an arbitrary bounce format.
This would be really great, the multi language support on the human
readable section
is something we rea
Hi
i cannot see why it's not possible to start with a "partial"
implementation that does not return the message body (does it explicity
forbid to have a implementation defined lenght limit of zero ?)
the rest of problems seem easy to fix
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, David Saez w
Hi
El 24/07/2013 10:37, Michael Deutschmann escribió:
I took a look at the patch (it at least applies with no rejects
against 4.80.1) to see how it handled what I would consider a really
hard part of the problem - the format of the DSN messages themselves.
Here, you have to:
maybe a good st
El 24/07/2013 10:07, Jeremy Harris escribió:
On 24/07/13 08:30, David Saez wrote:
In the other hand i think it's not very good that maintainers decide
what's philosophically right or wrong appart from strictly technical
questions, and decide by themselves what technology is right to u
Hi
There is a DSN patch for Exim (RFC 3461 SMTP Service Extension for
Delivery Status Notifications) at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eximdsn/ , it's a confirmation of
delivery to the remote mta (not a user confirmation receipt) but may
help ... i wonder why this feature was never added to Exim
Hi
There is a DSN patch for Exim (RFC 3461 SMTP Service Extension for
Delivery Status Notifications) at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eximdsn/ , it's a confirmation of
delivery to the remote mta (not a user confirmation receipt) but may
help ... i wonder why this feature was never added to
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 10:58 -0400, Steve Madsen wrote:
> For anyone that runs across this thread in the future, I have solved
> the problem and is it ever maddening.
>
> GNU TLS was choking on the contents of the certificate file because
> pasting them from an email added an extra space at the end
here is no need for the client to process my.cnf.
This assumes no other client uses this mysql server and requires
another charset by default.
David
Am 15.07.2013 15:37, schrieb Tobias Dostal:
Hi there,
I was unable to get exim autoreply/vacation transport work with my
mysql/utf8 tables so i
exactly the same exim
would cache them (per process) so it may not be needed for better
performance but I still like my approach for better readability, ymmv.
David
Am 11.07.2013 17:12, schrieb Cyborg:
Hi,
is it possible to have an sql select inside a transport who queries
informations and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/14/13 4:26 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2013-06-13, David Grant wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was testing the following in acl_check_data:
>>
>> accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts accept authenticated = * warn
>>
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:15 +0200, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
> I'm working on a working greylisting setup, but it currently has some
> trouble with mail coming from gmail, because the different delivery
> attempts may use different IP addresses. that's why I wanted to add a
> whitelist check.
That so
n:
You may want to try setting:
local_from_check = false
maybe in addition to these (depending on the headers set by phplist):
local_sender_retain = true
untrusted_set_sender = *
See the manual for what each setting does.
David
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 6/13/13 1:32 PM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 09:21 PM, David Grant wrote:
>> Has anyone else encountered this and found a good solution?
>
> As you've found, what you're calling "spoofing" isn't necessarily
> a bad thing. There are other
Hi,
I was testing the following in acl_check_data:
accept
hosts = +relay_from_hosts
accept authenticated = *
warnset acl_m_from_address = ${lc:${address:$h_From:}}
...
denycondition = ${if match{$acl_m_from_address}{@eff.org}{yes}{no}}
This worked to prevent spam where the se
ser can only invoke Exim
with a config file which is explicitly permitted.
There were enough other ways to permanently gain root privs, *other*
than "run a pipe as the root user", that this was necessary.
I suppose that might mean that FIXED_NEVER_USERS is redundant now.
--
David Woodhou
st regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:25 -0400, Chris Meadors wrote:
>
> #--
> # Although Exim is normally a setuid program, owned by root, it refuses to run
> # local deliveries as root by default. There is a runtime option called
> #
On 5/20/13 2:57 PM, David Grant wrote:
> On 5/17/13 6:31 PM, Todd Lyons wrote:
>
>> Have you checked to see if there is some kind of max
>> open files issue happening on your machine?
>
> This very likely could be it. Right now /proc/sys/fs/file-nr show 8448
> files o
On 5/20/13 3:58 PM, Miroslaw Baran wrote:
> On Mon 20 May 2013 14:57:20 David Grant wrote:
>
>> It's possible we didn't encounter the issue previously because exim
>> is restart every 24 hours to allow ClamAV to reload with updates
>> (ugh).
>
> O
On 5/17/13 6:31 PM, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Have you checked to see if there is some kind of max
> open files issue happening on your machine?
This very likely could be it. Right now /proc/sys/fs/file-nr show 8448
files open, which is more than the system default per account of 8192.
Over the weeken
On 5/17/13 11:49 AM, Cyborg wrote:
>
> That indicates usually, that something like a cache or a quota gets
> cleared and slowly filling back until up.
>
> My last suggestion is: strace , my most loved debug tool ;)
>
> just filter it to "open" and "stat" onlymode, that will show fails very
> q
On 5/17/13 4:16 AM, Cyborg wrote:
>
> This is all you need to do (simpliest setup):
>
> spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783
>
> acl_check_data:
> ...
>
> # Run SpamAssassin, but allow for it to fail or time out. Add a
> warning message
> # and accept the mail if that happens. Add an X-Spam-Fl
Hello,
Our exim config passes mail to spamassassin with a spamcheck_router router:
spamcheck_router:
no_verify
check_local_user
# When to scan a message :
# - it isn't already flagged as spam
# - it isn't already scanned
condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 11:40 +0400, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote:
>
> From: in mail headers and env-from are different? Looks interesting.
>
> But it seems too complex for simple user mind, and probably could not be
> configured for bare Outlook or FireFox without envelope rewriting on the
> server
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 22:37 +0400, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote:
> Pointless. Considerable amount of junk traffic consists of real
> and valid bounces, generated to spam mails with forged addresses.
> If you have several old domains with old addresses, some of them
> might be used by spammers, and y
Not sure what your problem is but you can do:
set acl_m_helo_check_a = ${lookup dnsdb{>: defer_never,
a=$sender_helo_name}{$value}}
and check if the lookup defered with
condition = ${if eq {$acl_m9}{}}
Hello.
I have the following conditions:
--
Hi
it's always possible to deliver the message to a pipe that in turn does the
message modification and then reinjects it into exim again, but maybe it
will be good to have some way to define a external application for
message manipulation or even allow embedded perl to modify the message
body
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 12:23 -0700, Thomas Leavitt wrote:
>
> My server logs are flooded with messages like this:
>
> 2013-03-29 08:03:34 1ULaq6-0002Zl-9J
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:400e:c01::1b] Network is
> unreachable
It sounds like there's something wrong with your network, unless
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 18:27 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> If you get a chance, could you try running an Exim which does *not*
> disable any TLS protocols, but export into its environ at startup:
>
> OPENSSL_ia32cap=~0x202
>
> ?
>
> My knowledge of the special OpenSSL capabilities e
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:23 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> > When you refer to MS bugs around the use of TLS1.1/TLS1.2 are you
> > referring to MS exchange servers and Exim talking to them using TLS?
>
> MS Exchange servers and interop with OpenSSL.
>
> *sigh*
>
> There's no good solution here
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 15:24 +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> In our organization there's a well-defined (and mostly exim-based) internal
> (on the WAN) email routing. Internally every site have a 'mail' aliases that
> point to un-authenticated and un-encrypted local server, so mobile users can
> move
El 02/02/2013 7:37, Phil Pennock escribió:
thanx, that's right, i was using a wrong version of our Makefile in tha box
On 2013-01-31 at 19:01 +0100, David Saez Padros wrote:
i've been using a dlopen extension for long time, but now i one
server i get the following error:
failed to
is ?
--
Thanx & best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 07:18 -0600, Raymond Norton wrote:
> What would be a safe condition to use SPF, without being too
> stringent?
As long as you never use it to *reject* mail, you should be fine.
SPF, by its very nature, can only give "yes" and "maybe" answers. It can
never give a definite "n
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:01 +0200, b...@bc-bd.org wrote:
> senders = ${if exists {/usr/lists/$local_part}\
> {lsearch;/usr/lists/$local_part}{*}}
>
> fails, and he can not send mail to the list.
>
> How can I solve this?
Most mailing lists check the From: header, no
n\t\
${if def:sender_address \
{(envelope-from <$sender_address>)\n\t}}\
id $message_exim_id\
${if def:received_for {\n\tfor $received_for}}
--
Best regards ...
----
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://w
I have been trying for many days to figure out how to change the
sender of an email in an exim filter.
The reason is because Facebook now requires that email replies
come from the same address as the facebook account, which means
I need to change my sender.
Has anyone figured out how to do this?
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 07:57 +, W B Hacker wrote:
> Greylisting, OTOH, gets 'in your face' when broadly applied.
>
> I can't see playing the game where one smacks legit arrivals on first
> sight just on general principle, then - 'maybe' - is kind enough to
> whitelist those who ... actually h
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 09:55 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> BTW let me know where I can get your GPG key.
> You can get mine from hkps://zimmermann.mayfirst.org
Yours is also (sensibly) available from the standard keyservers; I got
it from keys.gnupg.net. Mine can be obtained there too. But my messag
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 09:55 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> However I don't see anything in the implementation about RDNS or SPF.
It's not in the implementation. If it appeared, it would be one of the
examples in the 'Setting the conditions for "suspicious" mail' section.
As it says, you can use wh
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 15:10 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> The two greylisting implementations I'm familiar with, greylistd and
> postgrey,
> don't seem to have any configuration options related to RDNS or SPF. As far
> as I can tell they both operate solely on whether there is already an entry
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:19 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > * Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 2 minutes
> > ...
> > Probably DNS, RDNS or SPF issue. right or wrong ?
>
> I don't think this is RDNS or SPF is related.
It might be. Any half-sane greylisting implementation will have to have
George R. Kasica wrote:
> OK...Here is what is in OS/os.h-Linux
>
> # vi os.h-Linux
>
> /* Exim: OS-specific C header file for Linux */
>
> /* Some old systems we've received bug-reports for have a
> which
> does not pull in . Best to just pull it in now and have
> done
> with the issue. */
Hi
by now it works well with gdbm, thanx !
El 01/06/2012 10:34, Phil Pennock escribió:
On 2012-06-01 at 09:12 +0200, David Saez Padros wrote:
sorry, we are using Debian 6.0.3 (Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64) and Exim
version is 4.77 (self compiled)
Does switching to use GDBM instead solve it
Hi
El 01/06/2012 5:15, Phil Pennock escribió:
On 2012-05-31 at 16:52 +0200, David Saez Padros wrote:
I has some time to debug this problem which today seems to happen
constinuosly and have been able to reproduce the problem with a
exim process with debuggin enabled and get this output:
You
?
El 12/04/2012 10:23, David Saez Padros escribió:
Hi
Today exim eat all server cpu to the point that i was unable to
login as root. Once recovered i see one exim process eating 100%
cpu when delivering a message to a remote host
[log]# top
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM
it but in the next
queue run the same message was processed correctly
--
Best regards ...
David Saez
On-Line Services 2000 S.L.
http://www.ols.es
--
## List
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 10:36 -0600, Scott Neader wrote:
> Are you willing to look at the cap file from their side, to see if they are
> doing things right? I'd like to be able to tell them... look, RFC XXX says
> after we send the 250 OK, you should send a QUIT but your cap shows you are
> not..."
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:56 -0600, Scott Neader wrote:
> The mystery still stands as to why I am seeing all these SMTP command
> timeouts from just these "EdgeWave" mail servers. If the EdgeWave server
> has received our "250 OK" message, and their packet capture shows they have
> received it, and
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 16:08 -0600, Scott Neader wrote:
> I was able to get the remote mail server admin to send me a packet capture
> in .pcap format (if anyone wants to see it, I'd be glad to share, nothing
> confidential in the cap).
>
> What I see is that our Exim server sends the "250 OK id=xx
Hi
I'm using Exim 4.77 and have to avoid rejecting any mail when dkim fails as
we get a lot of "verification failed - signature did not verify" for
domains like
yahoo, google, aol, paypal, ...
Hi,
today i enabled signning with DKIM in Exim 4.76 - here is my route config:
remote_smtp:
dr
1 - 100 of 812 matches
Mail list logo
