Wonder if anyone has notice a problem with
Windows based server like Exchange or spamrtmail
sending to exim servers
Got this from a client
Your message wasn't delivered. Despite repeated attempts to deliver your
message, the recipient's email system refused to accept a connection from your
emai
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:57:04AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:44:30AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023, The Doctor via Exim-user
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:44:30AM +, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 00:33 The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >>> Still having problems with
> >>>
> >
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:36:38AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
wrote:
> Block at the firewall before they reach the server.
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 00:33 The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Still having problems with
> >
> > /var/log/exim/in_rejectlog:
Still having problems with
/var/log/exim/in_rejectlog:2023-01-18 14:27:01.484 [97258] refused connection
from [46.148.40.108]:61402 I=[204.209.81.246]:465 (host_reject_connection)
THere are still coming and not being dropped in a timely manner.
can these packets be dropped in less than 0.01 ms
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 06:38:40PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> And the paniclog on the upgraded server says what?
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, 18:37 The Doctor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:03:39AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via
> > Exim-users wrote:
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:03:39AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 4:08 AM The Doctor via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:25:53PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> > wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:25:53PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 13/12/2022 16:10, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > what should I be looking for?
>
> Logs. Both ends.
> --
> Cheers,
>Jeremy
>
egrep sednerdomain /var/log/exim/in*ai*log
2022-1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:06:51PM +, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> D??a 12. decembra 2022 23:25:53 UTC pouvate?? Jeremy Harris via
> Exim-users nap??sal:
>
> >The latter was in April 2003. There isn't any commentary for the
> >rationale for the lockout; the docs do say "called for HEL
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:25:53PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 13/12/2022 16:10, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > what should I be looking for?
>
> Logs. Both ends.
So far on my end
gzcat /var/log/exim/*0.gz | egrep scfc
2022-12-12 09:40:09.102 [5778]
All right, I even upgraded to Exim 4.96 on FreeBSD 13-STABLE
and I getting from outside hosts
Connected to PRimary Mail server but connection died. timed out (#4.4.2)
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
what should I be looking for?
Do you need my configura
Should DB5 be replaced by tokyocabinet ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Happy Christmas 2022 and
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:13:19AM -0500, Robert Blayzor via Exim-users wrote:
> On 12/7/22 10:34, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > How do you block a whole Class C like
> > 5.34.207.0/24 using the configuration file?
>
> Step 1.. understand that it's not a cla
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:42:46PM +, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> D??a 8. decembra 2022 14:33:01 UTC pouvate?? Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> nap??sal:
>
> >For those, use the main-config option "host_reject_connection" rather than
> >the
> >connect ACL - it operates before the TLS s
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:44:44PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:38 PM The Doctor via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 10:47:18PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
> > wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 10:47:18PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 12:22:13PM -0700, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:24:19PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via
> > Exim-users wrote:
> [...]
> > >
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:24:19PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:47 PM The Doctor via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:33:01PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> > wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:33:01PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 08/12/2022 13:26, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > tcp4 0 0 midwest.ab.ca.smtps5.34.207.58.62078 SYN_RCVD
> > tcp4 0 0 204.209.81.122.smtps 5.34.207.77.6296
ed.
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:31 AM Andreas Metzler via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2022-12-08 The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:02:55PM -0700, The Doctor via Exim-users
> > wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:02:55PM -0700, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:08:34PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> > On 07/12/2022 15:34, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > > How do you block a whole Class C like
> > &
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:08:34PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 07/12/2022 15:34, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > How do you block a whole Class C like
> > 5.34.207.0/24 using the configuration file?
>
> Make a start by reading the manual, about
How do you block a whole Class C like
5.34.207.0/24 using the configuration file?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROO
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:38:19AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:48 PM The Doctor via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
> > Any known issues with Exim and smatermail ruuning on a Win2016 server?
> >
> >
> Like wha
Any known issues with Exim and smatermail ruuning on a Win2016 server?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f
Quick question!
I have on my incoming server , virtual e-mail working correct.
Can I safely copy to the outbound server?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:21:37PM -0700, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> I was checking my https://www.nk.ca/eximstats.html
>
> and lo and behold looks like a huge number of rejected e-mails.
>
> Further netstat -a shows a lot of smtp connections being opened.
>
> An
I was checking my https://www.nk.ca/eximstats.html
and lo and behold looks like a huge number of rejected e-mails.
Further netstat -a shows a lot of smtp connections being opened.
Any way to deflect this?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & co
How can you block such domains using configuration?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Quebec oubli
Is their a way to close off Port 25 unless you are using SSL?
Heads up
The I caught on porn now pay up scandal is back.
Further this hackers are maurauding mail servers for usernames
and passwords to relay their messages.
We all need to closing port 25 to non-SSL traffic.
--
Member - Liberal
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:33:17PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 06/06/2022 23:18, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > Just going over my spam and I find this IP 195.133.39.99
> >
> > sending a lot of junk. How can you block such a class C?
> >
Just going over my spam and I find this IP 195.133.39.99
sending a lot of junk. How can you block such a class C?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 1
Question:
In my configuration file I have
tls_certificate = ${if exists\
{/path/to/2021/${tls_sni}/chain.cert}\
{/path/to/2022/${tls_sni}/chain.cert}\
{/path/to/default//chain.cert}\
}
tls_privatekey = ${if exists\
{path/to/old/${tls_sni}/
Any irregular issues since the openssl was released?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
I was wonder if it is doable that the outside world
can only see ports 587 and 465
while limiting port 25 to localhost only.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at
IIRC, exim is openssl 3 compliant.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Canada on 20 Sept
Is there a way of telling mail server to send mail now?
On Saturday a Brute Force DoS
took down a bit of the network
and since
some severs like gmail and megamailserver
are delaying sending to this mail server.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:53:46PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 12/04/2021 21:39, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > Does Exim support 8192 bit SSL keys?
>
> Nothing works until it's been tried, and I've not
> personally tested 8k (or even 4k) key
Does Exim support 8192 bit SSL keys?
IF so why is Thunderbird choking?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/
All roght how can I do this without usingtls_sni or tls_in_sli ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?
IS there a scripts that could
a) Examine a spam/junk Mailbox for the origin of spam
and parse the IP of origin
and
b) Tell exim to block such IP addresses?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:25:52AM +0100, Dave Restall - System Administrator,
, , via Exim-users wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-18 The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> > Trying Exim 4.94 and I am getting
> >
> > 2020-07-17 19:28:04.818 [8344] 1jwbdQ-00023D-Cx == doc.
Trying Exim 4.94 and I am getting
2020-07-17 19:28:04.818 [8344] 1jwbdQ-00023D-Cx == doc...@nk.ca R=localuser
T=local_delivery defer (-1) DT=0.001s: Tainted '/var/mail/doctor' (file or
directory name for local_delivery transport) not permitted
2020-07-17 19:28:05.074 [8355] 1jwbcO-0001zD-9p ==
Looks like Apple is having an issue ?
Has anyone seen:
mainlog:2020-06-15 09:52:33.737 [53360] 1jkrPV-000DsY-0w ** mailer-dae...@nk.ca
F= P= R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp
H=doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]:25 I=[204.209.81.3]:30512
X=TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256 CV=no DN="Cert": SMTP error f
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 01:17:51PM -0600, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> > On 19/05/2019 14:31, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > > ow can I force e-mail from the Internet At large to be only
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 19/05/2019 14:31, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > ow can I force e-mail from the Internet At large to be only accepted
> > if and only if done by SSL/TLS methods?
>
> ACL condition &quo
ow can I force e-mail from the Internet At large to be only accepted
if and only if done by SSL/TLS methods?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred
Just wondering why within a LAN there is about an 8 to 14 day delay.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 an
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:25:56AM +, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
>
> On 27/01/2019 13:42, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 2019, at 12:33, The Doctor via Exim-users
> > wrote:
> >> am certain many of you have seen this, but how do you blo
Symptoms:
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 23:28:02 -0700
From: Mail Delivery System
To: w...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
Reportin
1)
Please defined in DBM where you can add INCLUDES and LIBs
2)
The multiple configuration lines does not seem to work
3)
I added into my Makefile the local ID for EXim
but is still being rejected.
Working from FreeBSD 11.2 using Clang 7
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor
All right trying to put multiple wilcard SSL certidficates in
the configuration. When I do, I manage to kill the SSL funcationality.
in the configuraton file I have
local_interfaces = 0.0.0.0.25 : 127.0.0.1.10025 : 0.0.0.0.465 : 0.0.0.0.587
domainlist local_domains = @
domainlist relay_to_domai
/09/18 14:58, The Doctor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:31:23AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/09/18 09:05, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>>>> Von: openssl-users Im Auftrag von The
>>>> Doctor
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:46:57PM -0400, Phil Pennock via Exim-users wrote:
> On 2018-04-09 at 08:14 +0200, Kirill Miazine via Exim-users wrote:
> > Hi, Phil
> > * Phil Pennock via Exim-users [2018-04-08 17:24]:
> > [...]
> > > We've said "we only support versions of OpenSSL supported by the
> > >
All right!
I work with OPenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 on my FreeBSD servers.
LibreSSl is still OPenSSL 1.0.1 compliant
and GNUTLS still exists.
How can we satisfy all of the above scenarios?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & countr
Got a quick question?
Anyone getting a problem with gmail and the following:
malware acl condition: clamd : unable to send file body to socket
(204.209.81.1)
Just only happening with gmail accounts.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 03:44:08PM +, Mike Brudenell via Exim-users wrote:
> "The Doctor",
>
> Pulling together bits and pieces, and trying to add something of my own;
> see if this makes sense???
>
> The log entry for Exim message id 1eIGVs-000Ntb-OB shows t
ftp
# hostmaster: root
# webmaster:root
# www: webmaster
# NOTE: /var/msgs and /var/msgs/bounds must be owned by sendmail's
# DefaultUser (defaults to mailnull) for the msgs alias to work.
#
# msgs: "| /usr/bin/msgs -s"
# bit-bucket: /dev/null
# dev-null:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:02:58AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 16:30 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:07:23PM +, Martin A. Brooks via Exim-
> > users wrote:
> > > > ??Solution needed as of 2 days ago.
> > >
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:07:23PM +, Martin A. Brooks via Exim-users wrote:
> > Solution needed as of 2 days ago.
>
> Have you considered paying for some exim consultancy work?
>
Did not know legacy bugs were considered worth paying for.
>
>
> On 24 November 2
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:03:03AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:18:29AM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > On 24/11/17 03:30, The Doctor wrote:
> > > 2017-11-23 13:00:00 1eHxbt-0008Sf-2W ** {legit e-mail address}
> > > R=dnslookup T=remo
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:18:29AM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 24/11/17 03:30, The Doctor wrote:
> > 2017-11-23 13:00:00 1eHxbt-0008Sf-2W ** {legit e-mail address} R=dnslookup
> > T=remote_smtp H=doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]
> > X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-S
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:23:52PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:45:58PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:28:13AM +, Jasen Betts wrote:
> > > On 2017-11-24, The Doctor wrote:
> > > > For the first time today I am see
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:45:58PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:28:13AM +, Jasen Betts wrote:
> > On 2017-11-24, The Doctor wrote:
> > > For the first time today I am seeing
> > >
> > > 2017-11-23 13:00:00 1eHxbt-0008Sf-2W ** {legi
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:28:13AM +, Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2017-11-24, The Doctor wrote:
> > For the first time today I am seeing
> >
> > 2017-11-23 13:00:00 1eHxbt-0008Sf-2W ** {legit e-mail address} R=dnslookup
> > T=remote_smtp H=doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209
For the first time today I am seeing
2017-11-23 13:00:00 1eHxbt-0008Sf-2W ** {legit e-mail address} R=dnslookup
T=remote_smtp H=doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]
X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256 CV=no: SMTP error from remote mail
server after pipelined MAIL FROM: SIZE=13880523: 501 : se
I found this in my logs
/var/log/exim/rejectlog:2017-11-02 03:21:43
H=66-220-155-143.outmail.facebook.com (mx-out.facebook.com) [66.220.155.143]
X=TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128 CV=no
F= rejected RCPT :
relay not permitted
All right now come Exim isreject my mother's e-mail from facebook
when
This moring found in my logs that outlook.com
was trying to get 2 smtp connection but discoonected
when greater than one.
in my configuration I found
smtp_accept_max = 25
smtp_accept_max_per_host = 25
smtp_accept_max_per_connection = 25
smtp_accept_queue = 1
why was the configuration overruled?
Get a lot of relaynot permitted today no known reason
from the logs
egrep gmail /var/log/exim/*log | egrep a-1
/var/log/exim/mainlog:2017-11-01 11:46:38 H=mail-oi0-f41.google.com
[209.85.218.41] X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128 CV=no
F= rejected RCPT : relay not permitted
/var/log/exim
Does anyone recall a bug from a few months ago where a feature
had to be turned off?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Loo
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Kirill Miazine via Exim-users wrote:
> * The Doctor [2017-10-28 15:27]:
> [...]
> > > So, what's the owner of the binary? And - does your OS provide some
> > > means to disallow set-uid binaries from setting the (e)uid (Linux
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 03:58:20PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
wrote:
> The Doctor (Sa 28 Okt 2017 15:42:25 CEST):
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:59:01PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > > On 27/10/17 20:34, The Doctor wrote:
> > > > L
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-10-28 at 15:58 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> > So, what's the owner of the binary? And - does your OS provide some
> > means to disallow set-uid binaries from setting the (e)uid (Linux has,
> > but has your
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:59:01PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 27/10/17 20:34, The Doctor wrote:
> > Looks like an attachment failed.
>
> That's affecting a whole message, not only an attachment.
>
> > From the logs
> >
> > /var/log/exim/paniclog:20
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:09:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:09:01PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > To kick off the run up to the next Exim release -
> > the ftp site:
>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:09:01PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> To kick off the run up to the next Exim release -
> the ftp site:
>
> ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
>
> now has the initial release candidate build, RC1 of Exim 4.90
All right I have done what you said and still no dice.
Even with the no_rewrite, virtual domains users
are getting rewritten that then when the authenication happens,
the address is being rewritten.
Queston is is the client doing that or the server?
So far only MS Office Outlook is showing this
Just has to adjust this snippet in my configureation file
deny
!hosts = +relay_from_hosts
message = This message was considered to be spam
spam = www:true
condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{499}{1}{0}}
deny senders = /usr/local/etc/exim/deny_senders
The 499 was sent to 109 but was interf
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:20:26PM +, Dippery, Kyle wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:32:35PM +, Dippery, Kyle wrote:
> > 1) sounds like the file permissions on the destination mailbox aren't
> > right. Make sure the exim process has permission to write where you think
> > it's suppo
xim -bd -q1m -C /usr/local/etc/exim/configure.out
> 3) Are your errors on receiving from outlook.com or sending to outlook.com?
>
Receiving from
> --
> Kyle Dippery
> Engineering Computing Services
> 219 RMB
> 859-257-1346
>
> ________
&
1)
Getting
2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 unable to set gid=6 or uid=20018
(euid=26): local delivery to ***
<***@doctor.nl2k.ab.catransport=local_delivery
2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 failed to read delivery status for
***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca from delivery subprocess
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:32:49PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> 1)
>
> Getting
>
> 2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 unable to set gid=6 or uid=20018
> (euid=26): local delivery to *** <***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
> transport=local_delivery
> 2017-10-06 12:55
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 07/10/17 14:14, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:25:35AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> >> Is the Exim binary setuid?
>
> >
> > This is ufs and the exim binary is set to 1755
>
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:25:35AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-10-06 at 17:50 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:28:43PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > > Current version of the FreeBSD 11 port
> > >
> > > /usr/local/sbin/
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:28:43PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:12:21PM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > On 2017-10-06 at 13:32 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > > 1)
> > > 2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 failed to read delivery status for
>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:12:21PM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-10-06 at 13:32 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > 1)
> > 2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 failed to read delivery status for
> > ***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca from delivery subprocess
>
> The child pro
1)
Getting
2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 unable to set gid=6 or uid=20018
(euid=26): local delivery to *** <***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
transport=local_delivery
2017-10-06 12:55:36 1e0XmX-Ww-I2 failed to read delivery status for
***@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca from delivery subprocess
Question what cause mail to stall in a queue?
Something in the configuration?
Before dropping my configuration i, how do I get rid off the comments and then
we can examine.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan P
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:07:13AM +, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-28 at 22:48 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > I have uploaded Exim 4.89 RC7 to:
> >
> > https://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
>
> No replies. I don't know whether to be ecstatic or very very afraid.
>
> Unless I hea
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 04:44:05PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On 12 February 2017 at 00:19, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> > On 2017-02-11 at 06:14 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > > root@gallifrey:/usr/source # exim -d -bV
> > > Exim version 4.89 #5 built 11-Fe
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43:31PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
wrote:
> On 12 February 2017 at 04:25, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> > I have uploaded Exim 4.89 RC4 to:
> >
> > https://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
> >
> > This is a few minor fixes over RC3 but increases my confid
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 01:36:37AM +, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-11 at 17:50 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > All right, I will test when RC4 comes out.
>
> It's out.
>
> > All right please review what was sent.
> >
> > NS1 is using openssl 1.0.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:29:04AM +, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-11 at 16:13 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:19:05PM +, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > > Build 4.89 with the same DB you built 4.88 with.
> >
> > Most likely it is DB6 and
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:19:05PM +, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2017-02-11 at 06:14 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > root@gallifrey:/usr/source # exim -d -bV
> > Exim version 4.89 #5 built 11-Feb-2017 05:34:07
> > Probably Berkeley DB version 1.8x (native mode)
>
>
>
All right seems there is an issue with
a crashing clamd.
However I was preparing an extesive debug file
using
exim -v -qff -d+all
but somehow the file /dev/null'ed itself :-(
Tomorrow I hope to hav3e said file.
Is there a max bytes on posts?
Running Openssl latest on FreeBSD 11.
--
Memb
Looks as if there is an issue sending mail between the server
using SSL that I had to revert back to Exim 4.88
Using FreeBSD 11.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
htt
port +smtp_connection
>
> (sits in the same config area as "smtp_accept_max = 10")
>
> Now, when tailing the exim_main.log log file, you can see what the
> "Connection Count" number is. I think you'll find this useful.
>
> 2017-01-25 11:04:50 SMTP connection f
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:34:23PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > I cannot find the culprit doing this.
> >
> > Using Exim 4.88 on FreeBSD 11 I placed this into my configuration:
> [...]
> > smtp_accept_max = 10
>
> Well, you have a limit of 10 simultaneous SMTP connections period.
> Once y
Help.
I cannot find the culprit doing this.
Using Exim 4.88 on FreeBSD 11 I placed this into my configuration:
split_spool_directory = true
message_size_limit = 50M
#MailScanner additions
#SPOOL = /var/spool/exim
#spool_directory = SPOOL
spool_directory = /var/spool/exim
#spool_directory =
How can you limit say www to only say 100 e-mail /hr ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Birthd
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 03:28:31PM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I have built and uploaded to
>
> ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
>
> the RC5 release candidate build of Exim 4.88
> Built and signed by myself.
>
> Sha256 sums:
>
>
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
