}{1}{0}}
.endif
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=55234
--
## List details
Dennis Davis Wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, gascione wrote:
From: gascione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:00:43 -0400
Subject: [exim] Not very efficient I believe
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim
gateways. I
|
|Download: http://www.exim-users.org/forums/attachment.php?postid=220|
+---+
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim
against
mymailserver.mydomain.com:+local_domains:+relay_to_domains: DNS
lookup of vmail1.ds.tellurian.net deferred
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View
}'
This does not work. Any help would be appreciated.
GA
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums
and
triplet files get into the MB range. Any reason to care about that?
GA
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums
approximately 40k to our customers/day
or approximately 280k/week.
Again, no complaints so far, just compliments.
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View
Dean Brooks Wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:05:11AM -0500, gascione wrote:
All I can tell you is that over the past week we have not received
any
complaints at all for greylisting. I believe that most MTA's will
try
to resend at least once in 5 minutes, at least that is what we
Sorry, wrong, there are versions for Fedora Core x out there.
George
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Have not seen one but your should be able to compile from the debian
source.
--
gascione
gascione's Profile
I understand, sorry for the reply Jeremy.
GA
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php
Anybody?
Thanks
GA
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=53540
--
## List
Thank you, that was very helpful.
Perhaps you can tell me what you found insufficient about the original
question when I started this post.
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php
that automatically inserted into the
router's route list?
GA
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid=112
View this thread: http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php
We use exim4 servers as front end antivirus, spam checking, sender/receiver,
stuff like that before the mail is passed off to our commercial email
application. If a valid message is delivered the headers screw up some
functionality on the mail server side because the last hop of the mail is
our
.
Thank You
GA
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 19:59, gascione took the opportunity to say:
We use exim4 servers as front end antivirus, spam checking,
sender/receiver, stuff like that before the mail is passed off to our
commercial email application. If a valid message
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:56, gascione took the opportunity to say:
The systems are not capable of doing what spamassassin can do. That is
why
we run ClamAV and Spamassassin on Exim servers before delivering the
messages to the mail systems. The problem
W B Hacker wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:28, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity
to
say:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 19:59, gascione took the opportunity to say:
We use exim4 servers as front end antivirus, spam checking,
sender/receiver, stuff like
W B Hacker wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:56, gascione took the opportunity to say:
The systems are not capable of doing what spamassassin can do. That is
why
we run ClamAV and Spamassassin on Exim servers before delivering the
messages to the mail systems
W B Hacker wrote:
gascione wrote:
*snip*
mail cluster. If I could find a way to deliver it in a way other than
SMTP I
guess that would solve the problem as well.
Given the hardware and a manualroute router, Exim can deliver it over 60
ma
bipolar TTY with Baudot code if you
Perhaps a little clean history is in order.
We have 6 pretty decent Debian Linux machines handling inbound mail as mx
servers. All MX records are set to the same preference so we load balance
pretty well.
Each server does the prelim stuff, HELO checking, valid envelope, stuff like
that and
W B Hacker wrote:
gascione wrote:
Perhaps a little clean history is in order.
We have 6 pretty decent Debian Linux machines handling inbound mail as mx
servers. All MX records are set to the same preference so we load balance
pretty well.
Each server does the prelim stuff, HELO
Hello;
We send all mail outbound from our primary mail servers to Exim outbound
relays so we can perform some basic tests on the mail and also load balance
the outbound traffic.
We have a problem with AOL. We have established their required feedback
loops and get SPAM reports from them. But
Peter Bowyer-2 wrote:
On 02/10/06, gascione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello;
We send all mail outbound from our primary mail servers to Exim outbound
relays so we can perform some basic tests on the mail and also load
balance
the outbound traffic.
We have a problem with AOL. We have
Chris Lightfoot wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:02:23AM -0700, gascione wrote:
Hello;
We send all mail outbound from our primary mail servers to Exim outbound
relays so we can perform some basic tests on the mail and also load
balance
the outbound traffic.
We have a problem
My exim configuration has the DNS black list check shown below and it worked
perfectly forever. Now it doesn't. If I watch the log in real time I can see
many log messages indicating that the check is actually being performed but
the program no longer tags the header with the X-SPAM-DNSBL.
The
All of our mail is filtered by inbound MX servers running Exim4.x and is sent
from our primary servers to outbound servers running Exim. This is all done
to help us perform as many checks we can on inbound and outbound mail.
We have been having a problem with some of our clients autoresponders
I know this isn't Exim's problem but I hope there is something I can do with
Exim to solve the problem.
We run mail in a gateway configuration with Linux based servers acting as
incoming MX servers to perform quite a bit of pre-processing on the inbound
email before handing it off to our primary
to verify if a recipient
# exists.
deny
log_message = Recipient verification with callout failed
!verify = recipient/callout
--
gascione
gascione's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org/forums/member.php?action=getinfouserid
29 matches
Mail list logo