I have remerged the exim after removing /var/log/exim. Now I don't have this
problem.
Thank you for your time.
... Necktwi
> On 28-Sep-2019, at 3:36 PM, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, 28. September 2019, 03:26:27 EDT schrieb Graeme Fowler via Exim-
> users:
>> On 28
Am Samstag, 28. September 2019, 03:26:27 EDT schrieb Graeme Fowler via Exim-
users:
> On 28 Sep 2019, at 07:48, necktwi via Exim-users
wrote:
> > you made me to compramise my identity? does strace.log and exim.log even
> > contain my private key?
> No, he’s not “made” you do anything, he suggeste
On 28 Sep 2019, at 07:48, necktwi via Exim-users wrote:
> you made me to compramise my identity? does strace.log and exim.log even
> contain my private key?
No, he’s not “made” you do anything, he suggested some diagnostics be provided
for the issue you’ve reported.
Luckily for you the message
> On 27-Sep-2019, at 12:49 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> On 26/09/2019 19:41, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
>> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (Mi 25 Sep 2019 10:26:14
>> EDT):
>>> Problem A) you have a corrupt file. The message even advises what to
>>> do; did you
On 26/09/2019 19:41, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (Mi 25 Sep 2019 10:26:14
> EDT):
>> Problem A) you have a corrupt file. The message even advises what to
>> do; did you do that?
>
> While we still should consider external influence as a root cause f
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users (Mi 25 Sep 2019 10:26:14
EDT):
> Problem A) you have a corrupt file. The message even advises what to
> do; did you do that?
While we still should consider external influence as a root cause for
this database corruption, I got reports of a major Exim user, that
the
On 26 Sep 2019, at 15:57, necktwi via Exim-users wrote:
> but i don't think i've seen any improvement. Below is the log after the
> change
That's a small snippet which is not showing the submission of messages. I
suggested lines to look for in my previous message to the list.
Graeme
--
##
On 25 Sep 2019, at 15:43, necktwi via Exim-users wrote:
> How to run recovery? I tried rm -rf /var/spool/exim/db/* and started the exim
That’s one perfectly valid way, although there are others specific to the
Berkeley DB tools you have installed (or can install).
However:
> These messages are
On 2013-08-22 at 20:02 +0530, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote:
> im getting following error in our exim log ,
>
> SMTP data timeout (message abandoned) on connection from
>
> is there any reason for that, how can is incease the smtp data time out
> value
The reason is almost certainly some kind of n
Hi guys ,
im getting following error in our exim log ,
SMTP data timeout (message abandoned) on connection from
is there any reason for that, how can is incease the smtp data time out
value
Thank you
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at h
Hi Graeme,
thanx! Works fine now!
Bas
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:11 +0200, Cyborg wrote:
without your config we can't help you.
Not strictly true - this is a common fault which has been explained
umpteen times on this mailing list. What's needed is "submission mode"
in the appropriate ACL as d
> From: Bas van Oosterum
>I last configured one of our mailservers to allow authenticated smtp.
> how do I tell exim not to add
>@romeinen.ichthusict.org to the "from" field?
A simple answer is:
accept authenticated = *
control = submission/domain=
(with nothing after "domai
Hi
>2011-09-22 10:06:16 1R6eI9-0006ap-A7 ** [1]hannek...@upcmail.nl
>R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mail server after
>MAIL FROM:<[2]"nicole...@kerknet.org"@romeinen.ichthusict.org>
>SIZE=39045: host mx0.upcmail.net [213.46.255.200]: 550 5.1.0
><[3]"nicole...
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:11 +0200, Cyborg wrote:
> without your config we can't help you.
Not strictly true - this is a common fault which has been explained
umpteen times on this mailing list. What's needed is "submission mode"
in the appropriate ACL as documented here:
http://www.exim.org/exim-
Am 26.09.2011 21:49, schrieb Bas van Oosterum:
Hi all,
I last configured one of our mailservers to allow authenticated smtp.
It works, but ... i get the next error in the log file:
2011-09-22 10:06:16 1R6eI9-0006ap-A7 ** [1]hannek...@upcmail.nl
R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP
Hi all,
I last configured one of our mailservers to allow authenticated smtp.
It works, but ... i get the next error in the log file:
2011-09-22 10:06:16 1R6eI9-0006ap-A7 ** [1]hannek...@upcmail.nl
R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mail server after
MAIL FROM:<[2]
Hi all, I don't work very much with Exim but I just solved a little problem on
my web
server, running Exim, that I figured I should share with the list because I
wasn't able to
find this information there originally.
I use Exim in combination with another server running MDaemon under Windows via
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:44, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, listrcv wrote:
> > Which RFC does specify that an MTA must have a static IP and DNS entries?
>
> When the original RFCs were written *every* Internet host had a static
> IP. It was taken for granted. That was the way the Int
>> Which RFC does specify that an MTA must have a static IP and DNS entries?
>
> The newer RFCs don't mention this either (I suspect - I haven't read every
RFC). However, in practice, you will find it very hard to run an MTA
reliably without a static IP and reverse DNS.
In fact it is even easier t
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
If you're located in Germany (as I guess from your mail address) and
have some normal T-Online DSL with dynamic IP address, then it should be
possible to order a static IP for something around 3..5 € / month. (At
least some of our customers have it, and theses addre
listrcv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mi 19 Apr 2006 10:08:12 CEST):
> It has disadvantages, but I do it at home, and it's much more reliable
> then using a smarthost. I surely would like to have a static IP and DNS
> entries, but it's impossible to get that.
If you're located in Germany (as I guess from
Tony Finch wrote:
When the original RFCs were written *every* Internet host had a static
IP. It was taken for granted. That was the way the Internet worked. But
there was no DNS...
The newer RFCs don't mention this either (I suspect - I haven't read
every RFC).
They do require that the MTA u
Philip Hazel wrote:
> However, in practice, you will find it very hard to run an
> MTA reliably without a static IP and reverse DNS. That's just the way
> it is.
It has disadvantages, but I do it at home, and it's much more reliable
then using a smarthost. I surely would like to have a stati
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, listrcv wrote:
> >
> > Which RFC does specify that an MTA must have a static IP and DNS entries?
>
> When the original RFCs were written *every* Internet host had a static
> IP. It was taken for granted. That was the way the Internet w
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, listrcv wrote:
> Which RFC does specify that an MTA must have a static IP and DNS entries?
When the original RFCs were written *every* Internet host had a static
IP. It was taken for granted. That was the way the Internet worked. But
there was no DNS...
The newer RFCs don'
W B Hacker wrote:
RFC-compliant MTA's are not expected to operate without a fixed-IP and
proper DNS entry.
Which RFC does specify that an MTA must have a static IP and DNS entries?
Smarthosts are too unreliable to be used.
GH
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-
Quoting Menekhem M. Zviman:
>host gateway-r.comcast.net [204.127.198.26]: 550-69.250.247.7 blocked by
> ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=comcast,dc=net
>550 Comcast.net subscribers are not permitted to directly connect to
> this mail server.
Looks like the same as T-Online is doing: The MXs are not reac
Menekhem M. Zviman wrote:
Hello,
My ISP, comcast.net, does not allow direct connection to their mail
server.
Nor should they.
Below is a log entry of an attempt to send mail via SquirrlMail
-> Courier IMAP -> Exim.
In all probability, comcast.net expect a 'subscriber' to connect
from an
Hello,
My ISP, comcast.net, does not allow direct connection to their mail
server. Below is a log entry of an attempt to send mail via SquirrlMail
-> Courier IMAP -> Exim.
Here is the bounced message:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent c
Thank you.
It's work perfect.
Leonid
Steven Wayne wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Leonid Shulov wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:09:57 +0200
From: Leonid Shulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Exim Mailing List
Subject: Re: [exim] SMTP error from remote mail ser
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Leonid Shulov wrote:
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:09:57 +0200
> From: Leonid Shulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Exim Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [exim] SMTP error from remote mail server
>
> Steven Wayne wrote:
>
> >On Wed,
Leonid Shulov wrote:
Steven Wayne wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Leonid Shulov wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:16:13 +0200
From: Leonid Shulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: [exim] SMTP error from remote mail server
When I send mail from r
Steven Wayne wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Leonid Shulov wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:16:13 +0200
From: Leonid Shulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: [exim] SMTP error from remote mail server
When I send mail from root to SMTP server in lo
I grep'ed in config files but don't found "require verify=sender"
Leonid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.01.2006 11:16:13:
When I send mail from root to SMTP server in log file and Mail Delivery
I see this report:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error fro
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Leonid Shulov wrote:
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:16:13 +0200
> From: Leonid Shulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: [exim] SMTP error from remote mail server
>
> When I send mail from root to SMTP ser
Leonid Shulov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mail.arabellasw.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: 550 cannot route to
sender address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Probably "myhost.localdomain" isn't in the DNS as viewed by
mail.arabellasw.co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 18.01.2006 11:16:13:
> When I send mail from root to SMTP server in log file and Mail Delivery
> I see this report:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> host mail.arabellasw.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xx
When I send mail from root to SMTP server in log file and Mail Delivery
I see this report:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mail.arabellasw.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: 550 cannot route to
sender address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What c
38 matches
Mail list logo
