Le Vendredi 17 Mai 2002 06:51, vous avez écrit :
A commerical application is not necessaryly proprietry, sorry if I seem
like someone flogging a dead horse but i dont think its much of a
point either way for mandrake, but not using the correct description
leads to people miss understanding.
civileme wrote:
J. Grant wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested to know why Commerical Apps CD1 is called that? As in
actual fact the entire GNU/Linux Madrake distribution is commercial.
Well, there is nothing wrong with commercialising high quality Free
(open source) software. In fact very
J. Grant wrote:
civileme wrote:
J. Grant wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested to know why Commerical Apps CD1 is called that? As in
actual fact the entire GNU/Linux Madrake distribution is commercial.
Well, there is nothing wrong with commercialising high quality Free
(open source)
Hi,
I think this is more semantics than anything else.
Perhaps, but its better to be correct when you are a market leader like
mandrake.
The CDs that are in the pack which are downloadable also are included in
the pack. They are not free of charge. If you asked me to burn you a
copy
On Thursday 16 May 2002 11:17 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
I think this is more semantics than anything else.
So do I, IMHO...
Perhaps, but its better to be correct when you are a market leader like
mandrake.
I'm sorry to butt in here, but I've been watching this thread and
well...personally I
darklord wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2002 11:17 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
I think this is more semantics than anything else.
So do I, IMHO...
Perhaps, but its better to be correct when you are a market leader like
mandrake.
I'm sorry to butt in here, but I've been watching this thread
On Thu, 16 May 2002 23:37:35 -0400
darklord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2002 11:17 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
I think this is more semantics than anything else.
So do I, IMHO...
Perhaps, but its better to be correct when you are a market leader like
mandrake.
I'm
Hello,
I'm interested to know why Commerical Apps CD1 is called that? As in
actual fact the entire GNU/Linux Madrake distribution is commercial.
Well, there is nothing wrong with commercialising high quality Free
(open source) software. In fact very glad Madrake is commericialising it.
Perhaps
J. Grant wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested to know why Commerical Apps CD1 is called that? As in
actual fact the entire GNU/Linux Madrake distribution is commercial.
Well, there is nothing wrong with commercialising high quality Free
(open source) software. In fact very glad Madrake is
