Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-25 Thread nds
Praedor Tempus wrote: I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1 (6th or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589 card...after I dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with dhcp-common/dhcp-client rpms, that is. The big stopper

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-25 Thread Praedor Tempus
The reason I have resisted straight kernel.org kernels (up to now) is that the mandrake kernels integrate more features than the simple kernels...like the grsec settings in 2.4.17 that are not there in the kernel.org kernel. There are other niceties too. As for kernel-2.3.13, I had a working

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-25 Thread tester
Praedor Tempus wrote: OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing a source build I just installed the binary and rebooted. It booted up and...jus as with my own build attempts, pcmcia

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-25 Thread nds
Praedor Tempus wrote: The reason I have resisted straight kernel.org kernels (up to now) is that the mandrake kernels integrate more features than the simple kernels...like the grsec settings in 2.4.17 that are not there in the kernel.org kernel. There are other niceties too. As for

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-25 Thread CB
nds said: Couldn't you save the configurationg of a happy Mandrake kernel that you customized and load that into the configuration of a source tarball kernel? Wouldn't that still provide a happy medium? You can also do a diff between the configuration file of a happy mandrake kernel and

[expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread Praedor Tempus
OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing a source build I just installed the binary and rebooted. It booted up and...jus as with my own build attempts, pcmcia failed miserablely and sound

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread daRcmaTTeR
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:17:12 -0800 (PST) Praedor Tempus [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder: OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing a source build I just

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread Praedor Tempus
I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1 (6th or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589 card...after I dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with dhcp-common/dhcp-client rpms, that is. The big stopper now is STILL sound. I had

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread NDPTAL85
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:25 PM, Praedor Tempus wrote: I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1 (6th or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589 card...after I dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread mike
did you look here? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ it has kernel 2.4.13 Mike Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] Confirmed dead 2.4.27.8

2002-01-24 Thread mandrake
Again, did you ever build a 2.4.17 kernel from straight source (not from SRPM)? And if you want 2.4.13 (or any other kernel for that matter), it's available at ftp.kernel.org. Cheers, -Charlie Praedor Tempus said: I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1