[expert] gcc 3.0

2002-01-23 Thread Praedor Tempus
How is gcc 3.0 these days? Has its problems been corrected enough to make it a worthy compiler? praedor _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? G

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0

2001-11-24 Thread Darwin Gottfried
On Saturday 24 November 2001 18:20, you wrote: > So sprach »Jose Luis Vazquez Gonzalez« am 2001-11-24 um 18:49:22 +0100 : > > Hi, > > > > Has someone upgraded to gcc 3.0.x? > > Yep. > > > how? > > urpmi gcc3 > > Dunno if it's in 8.1, but it's for sure in cooker. yep it's in the download version o

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0

2001-11-27 Thread Brad Felmey
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 19:28, Darwin Gottfried wrote: > yep it's in the download version of 8.1 for sure. gcc 3.0.1. [Copy posted to the list instead of an individual] G. May I suggest to the listop that reply-to be changed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for any messages posted via the list? Avoid

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0

2001-11-28 Thread Ed Tharp
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 23:36, you wrote: > On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 19:28, Darwin Gottfried wrote: > > yep it's in the download version of 8.1 for sure. gcc 3.0.1. > > [Copy posted to the list instead of an individual] > > G. May I suggest to the listop that reply-to be changed to > "[EMAIL

Re: [expert] gcc 3.0

2002-01-24 Thread James
Praedor, I haven't used it myself, but a friend of mine (one of the original members of 386 BSD development team at Berkley) has been trying it out. He said that for now anything built with it isn't compatible with programs compiled with earlier versions of gcc. In short he told me it's going

Re: [expert] gcc 3.0

2002-01-24 Thread daRcmaTTeR
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:03:35 -0800 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > Praedor, >I haven't used it myself, but a friend of mine (one of the original > members of 386 BSD development team at Berkley) has been trying it out. > He said that for now anything buil

[expert] GCC 3.0 install failure

2001-08-06 Thread Jesse Hepburn
I’m trying to upgrade to GCC 3.0 (because 2.96 is buggy).  Whenever I try to make it (using make --bootstrap) I get preprocessor errors and the make fails.  Is this a known problem, or is it just me?  Any help would be appreciated.   Cheers, Jesse

[expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-20 Thread Shahrimi Johann
Hi all, just a question. GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes with libraries that will be used in the programs that are created using them. These resulting programs that we developed, do they fall under GPL/Open Source as well since GPL is otherwise known as Contagious License? This n

RE: [expert] GCC 3.0 install failure

2001-08-07 Thread Gregor Maier
On 06-Aug-2001 Jesse Hepburn wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade to GCC 3.0 (because 2.96 is buggy). Whenever I > try to make it (using make --bootstrap) I get preprocessor errors and > the make fails. Is this a known problem, or is it just me? Any help > would be appreciated. > > Cheers, > Jesse

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-20 Thread Craig Sprout
Shahrimi Johann wrote: > > Hi all, > > just a question. > GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes with libraries that will be > used in the programs that are created using them. I'm no expert on the GPL, but, as I understand it, it only becomes viral when you use source from another GPL

RE: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-20 Thread JoeLX
ED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 07:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL > > > Shahrimi Johann wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > just a question. > > GCC is a GPL, open source softw

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-21 Thread Nathan Callahan
hting more than libc and glibc > you > dont have to release your software under the gpl > > -- > Imperial College, Department Of Computing > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: 020 785 22277 > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EM

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-21 Thread Pierre Fortin
Nathan Callahan wrote: > > BTW M$, AFIK, does not use GPLed code in any of its operations. It uses > BSD licensed code, which, by not having the contagious elements of the > GPL, lets this sort of thing go on. They DO use lots of GPL code... albeit to try to move *nix users to NT... http://www

Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-21 Thread ninjaz
Joe, The Official GPL FAQ is here: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html There is an entry for specifically covering your question: "Q: I use the C or C++ programming language, and I compile with GCC. Must I release software I write in the language under the same license as GCC? A: Use of

RE: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL

2001-06-28 Thread JoeLX
all and have a nice day! Best Regards, Joe RLU# 186063 "Reading is the essence of knowledge" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 01:53 AM > To: Shahrimi Joha