Linda Walsh wrote:
Found this interesting bit of trivia in the glibc library source:
i686 more Implies
# Due to the reordering and the oher nifty extensions in the i686 it is
# not really good to use heavily i586 optimized code on a i686. It's
# better to use i486/i386 code.
Under
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
Found this interesting bit of trivia in the glibc library source:
i686 more Implies
# Due to the reordering and the oher nifty extensions in the i686 it is
# not really good to use heavily i586 optimized code on a i686. It's
# better
Found this interesting bit of trivia in the glibc library source:
i686 more Implies
# Due to the reordering and the oher nifty extensions in the i686 it is
# not really good to use heavily i586 optimized code on a i686. It's
# better to use i486/i386 code.
Under i786 I found the comment
