Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-27 Thread Buchan Milne
: [expert] Memory Size This is not true anymore for 2.2 kernels, and since .. Wish that were true in all cases, got a p3/600 setting right behind me that required me to append the memory in Lilo. Seems it's more bios related since the kernel version is 2.2.15 Actually, I believe

RE: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-25 Thread Phil Connor
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Tobos Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Memory Size This is not true anymore for 2.2 kernels, and since .. Wish that were true in all

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-25 Thread Michael Proto
Phil Connor wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Tobos Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Memory Size This is not true anymore for 2.2 kernels, and since

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-25 Thread Felix Miata
Michael Proto wrote: Wish that were true in all cases, got a p3/600 setting right behind me that required me to append the memory in Lilo. Seems it's more bios related since the kernel version is 2.2.15 Actually, I believe this is a limitation of lilo itself, not the BIOS or kernel

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-24 Thread Larry Tobos
- Original Message - From: "Eric Mings" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 10:39 AM Subject: [expert] Memory Size A lot of earlier linux books indicate that the kernel does not properly understand memory greater than 64 megs unle

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-23 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Charles Curley am Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:24:30AM -0600: I'd say, if this is considerably less than 320, then... Good point. Some video cards, I believe AGP cards, take up various amounts of main memory for their own purposes, and free will report the amount of memory left over

[expert] Memory Size

2000-10-22 Thread Eric Mings
A lot of earlier linux books indicate that the kernel does not properly understand memory greater than 64 megs unless you add a memory size statement to lilo or at a boot prompt. I am running Mandrake 7 on one machine with 320 megs of memory. Using the kde system info (memory) panel it gives

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-22 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Eric Mings am Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:39:36AM -0400: Mandrake 7 on one machine with 320 megs of memory. Using the kde system info (memory) panel it gives what appears to be inconsistent Don't know about this KDE memory thingy, but type in "free" at a prompt. The very first

Re: [expert] Memory Size

2000-10-22 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 05:46:44PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: So sprach Eric Mings am Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:39:36AM -0400: Mandrake 7 on one machine with 320 megs of memory. Using the kde system info (memory) panel it gives what appears to be inconsistent Don't know about this KDE