Re: [expert] Pain in the Arse - Linux Stability

2001-01-08 Thread Al Baker
Well, I speak from a purely development-tuned install (started w/ recommended and went from there). Compiled my own apache/mysql/php/modperl/modssl/openssl/mm just fine. Didn't do much in the way of multimedia on it except for hardware detection. --- duane voth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al Ba

Re: [expert] Pain in the Arse - Linux Stability

2001-01-08 Thread duane voth
Al Baker wrote: > I have always found 7.1 to be completely stable. Well a comment like that begs a reply. I found 7.1 to be stable from a kernel perspective but most of my usual "addons" would not compile at all. All kinds of package conflicts and bad versions... I never did find the magic se

Re: [expert] Pain in the Arse - Linux Stability

2001-01-07 Thread Mark Weaver
On Saturday 06 January 2001 10:09 pm, you wrote: > Once again, I am chiming in on requesting a -stable- version of version > 7.1. 7.1 seems to work on a lot of systems (if you can get past the > blasted CDROM installer lockup bug!), and its updates are a known. > > Is there anyway someone can mak

Re: [expert] Pain in the Arse - Linux Stability

2001-01-06 Thread Al Baker
I have always found 7.1 to be completely stable. --- "Bob Puff@NLE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once again, I am chiming in on requesting a -stable- > version of version 7.1. 7.1 seems to work on a lot > of systems (if you can get past the blasted CDROM > installer lockup bug!), and its updates

[expert] Pain in the Arse - Linux Stability

2001-01-06 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once again, I am chiming in on requesting a -stable- version of version 7.1. 7.1 seems to work on a lot of systems (if you can get past the blasted CDROM installer lockup bug!), and its updates are a known. Is there anyway someone can make an updated ISO file of the master CD with all the upd