RE: SV: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-19 Thread Ron Heron
Actually, this whole thread is a joke. But, no, I am entirely too lazy to put all the rpms on one command line :) Also, for those so concerned that I won't know what the dependancies are, (I thought for sure that the "by golly" would have shown I was kidding) try this on any installed package:

RE: SV: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-19 Thread D. Stark - eSN
Ron said: "...you do a rpm -Uhv *.rpm in the directory you have all your recently downloaded packages. Well, you are going to fail dependancies on packages that you will eventully install anyway, further down the list. " Um, isnt that why you can put multiple rpms on ONE COMMAND LINE? Or were y

Re: SV: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-19 Thread Ron Heron
as they > should > don't send bug reports to developers. > > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af Ron Heron > Sendt: 19. januar 2001 00:19 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: [expert] RPM Updates > &

Re[2]: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-19 Thread Rusty Carruth
Tib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > magick :P I'm stuck and don't want to force it, what is image magick? a cool image fiddling tool/thingy. I think even google would find it for you... ;-) Yup, there it is: ImageMagick - Image Conversion and Manipulation Software, http://www.imagemagick.org/ r

SV: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-19 Thread Zeljko Vukman
--- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På; vegne af Ron Heron Sendt: 19. januar 2001 00:19 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: [expert] RPM Updates I may be doing it wrong, but by golly it has worked everytime! #rpm -Uhv --force --nodeps *rpm Ron

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Tib
Ok, I found mandrake update in the rpms for 7.2 and I'm trying to update my stuff so I can use it, only problem is that I keep hitting a snag of libbz2.so.1 when trying to install the grpm package - so I try to install/upgrade my bzip2 rpm and it says that libbz2.so.0 is needed by image magick :P

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread b5dave
-Uvh will update rpms that already exist on your system, but if the rpm doesn't already exist on your system, it will do the same as an -ivh (i.e., install the new rpm). In this sense, -ivh is redundant. -Fvh will *only* update rpms that already exist on your system. Dave. . On 18-Jan-2001 Mark W

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Tib
MandrakeUpdate? That's not anything I can find on my filesystem I'm running mandrake 7 btw... Tib On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Tib am Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:25:38PM -0800: > > how the hell do I update this SOB now? And did those files it downloaded stay > > som

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Ron Heron
Right, I forgot to mention that you should run a naked Uhv, then figure out what the complaints are, and make some sort of judgement on what to do. Then slap it in! usually, the packages that require forces are beta anyway. --- Tib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well using that command, it CAN'T f

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Ron Heron
I may be doing it wrong, but by golly it has worked everytime! #rpm -Uhv --force --nodeps *rpm Ron --- Tib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, after 12 hours of downloading and stuff - the Freshen command I > used just > spit everything back at me with conflicts and dependencies > [grumblegrumb

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Tib
well using that command, it CAN'T fail :] but who knows what conflicts may arise... I just wish there was an update utility on mandrake smart enough to help you with updating other dependencies rather than just bitching about it. Hmm, note to developers for future releases? A SMARTER PACKAGE UTIL

Re: [expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Tib am Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:25:38PM -0800: > how the hell do I update this SOB now? And did those files it downloaded stay > somewhere on the disk or get deleted? (I sure hope not.. that was a lot of Did you download them with MandrakeUpdate? If so, have a look at /var/cache/grpmi,

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 2001.01.19 Mark Weaver wrote: > So then it's better to do the -Uvh instead of the -Fvh? > When moving from 7.2 to Cooker, yes. Once all your system is a mess^H^H^H^HCooker, -F will be usefull again. -- J.A. Magallon $> cd pub mailto:[EMA

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread Mark Weaver
So then it's better to do the -Uvh instead of the -Fvh? -- Mark "If you don't share your concepts and ideals, they end up being worthless," "Sharing is what makes them powerful." Linus Torvalds On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > > On 2001.01.18 And

[expert] RPM Updates

2001-01-18 Thread Tib
Well, after 12 hours of downloading and stuff - the Freshen command I used just spit everything back at me with conflicts and dependencies [grumblegrumble] so how the hell do I update this SOB now? And did those files it downloaded stay somewhere on the disk or get deleted? (I sure hope not.. that

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 2001.01.18 Andrew George wrote: > > The gotcha is (of course there is one) that RPM dosn't handle dependancy > problems that well and you can run the command and just get a screenfull of > broken dependancy links thrown back at you for your trouble > Especially when package conventions ha

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread Anthony Russello
man rpm that states that -F will freshen or update the package only if it currently exists on your system in a presvious version. > On Wednesday 17 January 2001 10:06 pm, you wrote: > > On Mandrake's website, for each rpm update, it states to use rpm -Fvh > > *.rpm > > > > If you use that for a

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread Andrew George
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:04, you wrote: > On Wednesday 17 January 2001 10:06 pm, you wrote: > > On Mandrake's website, for each rpm update, it states to use rpm -Fvh > > *.rpm > > > > If you use that for a large quantity of rpm files, as I just tested, it > > works just fine. > > > > rpm -Fvh *.rpm

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread Tib
according to the manpage it's 'freshen' Tib On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Mark Weaver wrote: > On Wednesday 17 January 2001 10:06 pm, you wrote: > > On Mandrake's website, for each rpm update, it states to use rpm -Fvh > > *.rpm > > > > If you use that for a large quantity of rpm files, as I just teste

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-18 Thread Mark Weaver
On Wednesday 17 January 2001 10:06 pm, you wrote: > On Mandrake's website, for each rpm update, it states to use rpm -Fvh > *.rpm > > If you use that for a large quantity of rpm files, as I just tested, it > works just fine. > > rpm -Fvh *.rpm > > Thanks What is the "F" for? -- Mark "If you do

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-17 Thread Tib
Ok, so here's what I did (well, it's still running). I ran the following command, hope I was sane with this and not prone to screw up my system: rpm -Fvh ftp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mirrors/mandrake/7.2/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/*.rpm This should (if I understand it right) update all pakages that I have

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-17 Thread Anthony Russello
On Mandrake's website, for each rpm update, it states to use rpm -Fvh *.rpm If you use that for a large quantity of rpm files, as I just tested, it works just fine. rpm -Fvh *.rpm Thanks > On Wednesday 17 January 2001 08:01 pm, you wrote: > > Is there a way to do a mass update of my RPMs? ie

Re: [expert] RPM updates

2001-01-17 Thread Mark Weaver
On Wednesday 17 January 2001 08:01 pm, you wrote: > Is there a way to do a mass update of my RPMs? ie download them all and > just do rpm -Uvh * -nodep ? (or whatever that command would end up being) > > > Tib sounds like you've got the general idea, although I don't think I'd do the --nodeps t

[expert] RPM updates

2001-01-17 Thread Tib
Is there a way to do a mass update of my RPMs? ie download them all and just do rpm -Uvh * -nodep ? (or whatever that command would end up being) Tib