Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-20 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:30, Charlie M. wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 19, 2003 12:55 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: On Friday September 19 2003 01:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: Which brings us back again to the question as to whether downloads should be

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-20 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 20, 2003 01:06 am, James Sparenberg wrote: Since Mandrake is heavily dependant on the community for development, software contributions and patches, testing and bug reports, makin the distro unavailable for d/l till after

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Sat Sep 20, 2003 at 01:23:03AM -0600, Charlie M. wrote: [...] - From what I've seen so far from the boxes I've 'cooked'; and the postings on cooker from people regarding their upgrade experiences, it's looking as though the urpmi upgrade path will be less trouble than at any previous

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-20 Thread ed tharp
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 03:06, James Sparenberg wrote: Actually I'm planning on waiting a week.. Why? Well I want to do a urpmi based upgrade. Let the mirrors coold down. follow the directions and see if I either 1. Have a working box. 2. Have a reason to re-install. I'm hoping

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-20 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 06:02, ed tharp wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 03:06, James Sparenberg wrote: Actually I'm planning on waiting a week.. Why? Well I want to do a urpmi based upgrade. Let the mirrors coold down. follow the directions and see if I either 1. Have a working

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
James Sparenberg schrieb am Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:23:03 -0700: [lesson on sales figures] Now yes the sales numbers are small (they better be) One Fry's near me does 300 RH boxes a month on average (insider knowledge here.) or 3600 a year. They aren't the top store either. Times the 20

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread John Wilson
On September 18, 2003 07:23 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: snip ... (Less exposure always means decreased sales. period. Anyone who says otherwise needs to go to work for Ovaltine.) (note: Ovaltine was the #1 chocolate Milk powder in the US with about 80%

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
John Wilson schrieb am Fri, 19 Sep 2003 01:11:28 -0700: That would be a natural partnership, and I doubt that even Wolfgang can find fault with that idea. :-) Of course not! :) Every idea which helps Mandrake sell boxes is a good idea. But wasn't there a bit of polluted air between Walmart and

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:04, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: James Sparenberg schrieb am Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:23:03 -0700: [lesson on sales figures] Now yes the sales numbers are small (they better be) One Fry's near me does 300 RH boxes a month on average (insider knowledge here.) or 3600 a

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread ed tharp
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 22:23, James Sparenberg wrote: Snip just some food for thought. ( I spent t much time in logistics the last 20 years. *sigh*) I can sure Identify with the last statement there... only I have more like but it occurs to me that logistics/distribution and

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
ed tharp schrieb am 19 Sep 2003 06:10:19 -0400: Having a contractor who appreciates the GPL as a community (and so gives back to the community fairly) is (in my view, anyway) almost as important as their ability to get the boxes shipped. You know any? Dealing with such contractors is not

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 11:39 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: After he sold the first 20 Mandrake 9.1 PowerPacks he could not get any more from his wholesaler. He told me that they told him to wait for a couple of weeks. He refrained because after a couple of weeks it's not new anymore and people

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:07 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Friday 19 Sep 2003 11:39 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: After he sold the first 20 Mandrake 9.1 PowerPacks he could not get any more from his wholesaler. He told me that they told him to wait for a couple of weeks. He refrained because after

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 05:07, Anne Wilson wrote: On Friday 19 Sep 2003 11:39 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: After he sold the first 20 Mandrake 9.1 PowerPacks he could not get any more from his wholesaler. He told me that they told him to wait for a couple of weeks. He refrained because after

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Friday September 19 2003 01:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: Which brings us back again to the question as to whether downloads should be available as quickly as they are at present. Idealogically, yes, but in terms of income, maybe not. Anne Careful here... I suggested that around

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 19, 2003 12:55 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote: On Friday September 19 2003 01:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: Which brings us back again to the question as to whether downloads should be available as quickly as they are at present.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 7:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: Which brings us back again to the question as to whether downloads should be available as quickly as they are at present. Idealogically, yes, but in terms of income, maybe not. Anne Careful here... I suggested that around the time

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-19 Thread ed tharp
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:39, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: ed tharp schrieb am 19 Sep 2003 06:10:19 -0400: Having a contractor who appreciates the GPL as a community (and so gives back to the community fairly) is (in my view, anyway) almost as important as their ability to get the boxes

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 11:34, John Wilson wrote: On September 17, 2003 10:24 am, James Sparenberg wrote: Compusa now has a Linux aisle dominated by RH and SuSE box sets Fry's has put RH both in the aisle and on an endcap (which by the way was the way they sold MDK up through 7.2) The key

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
James Sparenberg schrieb am Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:12:28 -0700: One thing MDK has never been good at is tooting their own horn. I'm tired of seeing red hats and Lethargic Lizards at Linux world etc. We need more Top Hats *grin*. Although I agree to this in full I have to point out that we

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 09:21, Anne Wilson wrote: Finally, I would like to remind users that this is not a closed 'club'. We welcome material from any user, particularly if they are able to add to the hardware compatibility pages, or able to write a mini HOW-TO on any of the frequently

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 04:25, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: James Sparenberg schrieb am Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:12:28 -0700: One thing MDK has never been good at is tooting their own horn. I'm tired of seeing red hats and Lethargic Lizards at Linux world etc. We need more Top Hats *grin*.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread ed tharp
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 07:25, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: James Sparenberg schrieb am Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:12:28 -0700: One thing MDK has never been good at is tooting their own horn. I'm tired of seeing red hats and Lethargic Lizards at Linux world etc. We need more Top Hats *grin*.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
ed tharp schrieb am 18 Sep 2003 18:12:32 -0400: On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 07:25, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: Being presented at exhibitions, distributing boxes overseas (USA, Canada, Australia) is a costly venture which is right now just not paying back. Here's the thing, as I see it,,,

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:57, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: ed tharp schrieb am 18 Sep 2003 18:12:32 -0400: On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 07:25, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: Being presented at exhibitions, distributing boxes overseas (USA, Canada, Australia) is a costly venture which is right now just

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread John Wilson
On September 16, 2003 09:29 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: snip It sounds good except for one thing. In the developed world the US has less than half the broadband penetration of any other country. (Canada has about a 50% penetration, Korea 80% the US only 20%) Actually Canada is now up to

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 23:33, John Wilson wrote: On September 16, 2003 09:29 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: snip It sounds good except for one thing. In the developed world the US has less than half the broadband penetration of any other country. (Canada has about a 50% penetration, Korea

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 10:40 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:02, Anne Wilson wrote: Write to our favourite mags, regularly, quoting Mandrake as often as possible. Not a bad idea (I'm a LXF subscriber too), could be worth our while to make our preferences known. I

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:02 am, many eyes noted that Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 9:33 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: Anyway, if we feel that the retail market would start to grow up again, we would certainly consider to address it again. We're also aware that being on shelves is

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:29 pm, many eyes noted that James Sparenberg wrote: snip Anyway, if we feel that the retail market would start to grow up again, we would certainly consider to address it again. We're also aware that being on shelves is good for mindshare. Regards, Gaël.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
James Sparenberg schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:29:32 -0700: Are people downloading to save money, or, are they downloading just to get the product. No I don't have all the data, Gael has more. But, the 20% drop in sales is consistent with the drop other software vendors and retailers are

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread ed tharp
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 07:28, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: James Sparenberg schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:29:32 -0700: Are people downloading to save money, or, are they downloading just to get the product. No I don't have all the data, Gael has more. But, the 20% drop in sales is consistent

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread ed tharp
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 08:01, ed tharp wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 07:28, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: James Sparenberg schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:29:32 -0700: snip For Mandrake it is no change. Production and distribution of boxes is a very cost consuming thing which is not very

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 14:18, ed tharp wrote: yes,,, but it still seems to me a gold mine for some entrepreneur who can put it together to be a hands off distribution contractor where the distribution and printing of the product are taken off MDKsofts hands, and done by someone with as

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 06:00, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2003 14:18, ed tharp wrote: yes,,, but it still seems to me a gold mine for some entrepreneur who can put it together to be a hands off distribution contractor where the distribution and printing of the product are

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread kwan
Whereas you could well be right. You wouldn't know it here. Compusa now has a Linux aisle dominated by RH and SuSE box sets Fry's has put RH both in the aisle and on an endcap (which by the way was the way they sold MDK up through 7.2) The key seems to be the 3 disk sets as far as a

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread John Wilson
On September 17, 2003 10:24 am, James Sparenberg wrote: Compusa now has a Linux aisle dominated by RH and SuSE box sets Fry's has put RH both in the aisle and on an endcap (which by the way was the way they sold MDK up through 7.2) The key seems to be the 3 disk sets as far as a sales leader

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 20:34, John Wilson wrote: It all comes down to a chicken and egg argument. People who try Linux will opt for RedHat or SuSE because it's on the shelves. Mandrake barely even comes into it until some poor soul who bought RedHat suddenly realizes what a pain in

[expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem. Linux has little shelf-space in the UK, but I have *never* seen a Mandrake box. Admittedly, I've been wondering about this as

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Fernandez
T. Ribbrock wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem. Linux has little shelf-space in the UK, but I have *never* seen a Mandrake box. There are Mandrake boxes

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 9:46 am, Eric Fernandez wrote: T. Ribbrock wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem. Linux has little shelf-space in the UK, but I have

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Fernandez
Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 9:46 am, Eric Fernandez wrote: T. Ribbrock wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem. Linux has little

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread ed tharp
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 04:57, Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 9:46 am, Eric Fernandez wrote: T. Ribbrock wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Fernandez
ed tharp wrote: When you look, see if the box has any mention of McMillian Publishing. THese are the same company that puts out Que books, and at one time was the USA (possibly IIRC for the English language Areas version) distributor for MDK, and may still be. The boxes I saw in Canterbury were

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 10:33, T. Ribbrock wrote: Admittedly, I've been wondering about this as well. In the Netherlands, *if* I see a distro in the shops, it's SuSE or Red Hat and that's it. Cheerio, Thomas I've noticed the same and also noticed that what is on offer, is usually

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Huff
Around here (it was Borders i think) Mandrake 9.0 was on the shelf nect to RedHat. I noticed it just before 9.1 came out, and i didn't get the idea it just showed up. Of coure, i live in pasadena, california, 1 mile from where the old US Mandrake office was... -- Mandrake HowTo's More:

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread John Wilson
On September 16, 2003 03:00 am, ed tharp wrote: When you look, see if the box has any mention of McMillian Publishing. THese are the same company that puts out Que books, and at one time was the USA (possibly IIRC for the English language Areas version) distributor for MDK, and may still be.

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
John Wilson schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:41:03 -0700: My assumption is that either the entry into bankruptcy protection messed up their distrubtion channels and McMillian pulled back or that someone just dropped the ball in North America. Sorry to say, but: no. I took the freedom to

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 16 Sep 2003 9:33 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: Anyway, if we feel that the retail market would start to grow up again, we would certainly consider to address it again. We're also aware that being on shelves is good for mindshare. Regards, Gaël. unquote I can see his

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:02, Anne Wilson wrote: Write to our favourite mags, regularly, quoting Mandrake as often as possible. Not a bad idea (I'm a LXF subscriber too), could be worth our while to make our preferences known. I bet there's quite a few of us here. Ann you are priceless

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread ed tharp
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:33, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: John Wilson schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:41:03 -0700: My assumption is that either the entry into bankruptcy protection messed up their distrubtion channels and McMillian pulled back or that someone just dropped the ball in North

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 01:33, T. Ribbrock wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: I really would like to see some authorative statement as to why Mandrake has this visibility problem. Linux has little shelf-space in the UK, but I have *never* seen a Mandrake

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 03:04, Eric Fernandez wrote: ed tharp wrote: When you look, see if the box has any mention of McMillian Publishing. THese are the same company that puts out Que books, and at one time was the USA (possibly IIRC for the English language Areas version) distributor for

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 13:33, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: John Wilson schrieb am Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:41:03 -0700: My assumption is that either the entry into bankruptcy protection messed up their distrubtion channels and McMillian pulled back or that someone just dropped the ball in North