[expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:07:12AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:29:16 +0200: > > Linux companies are a necessary evil in my eyes. They're needed to > > help prevent monopolies from drowning the software world in > > proprietary lock-ins, as unfortunate

[expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:40:51AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:59 +0200: > > I did not mean such that involved proprietary stuff. I meant projects > which involve a lot of time and engagement. If there were only people > doing it in their spare ti

[expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:46:06PM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: [...] > So, why don't you read the statements > of long-term Mandrake users and go to the website and read the last 3 > year's news from Mandrake. They show a lot of Mandrake's commitment to > Open Source. It's just one page. I'll k

[expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 15 Sep 2003 10:25 am, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > That leaves only the product "download edition" if I do want the > > distro, which is a pity. > > > I would have much more sympathy with your argument if you had at any > point

[expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:39:13PM -0700, John Wilson wrote: > Perhaps I'd feel better if you could tell me one patch you contributed to a > CVS, one contribution you made to a project even at high level design, one > thing you've done other than complain. At least then I'd have to rethink my >

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:59 +0200: > the projects that wouldn't have been possible: Correct me, if I'm > wrong, but I think many of those included stuff, where proprietary > things were involved - stuff, that had to be done from business to > business. That's another aspect of

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Guy Van Sanden
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:40, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:59 +0200: > > Aha. How about this: If a product is good, I don't care whether I have > to pay for it or not, I'll get it. If the product is not good, I don't > care about free versions, I just don

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread ed tharp
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 02:58, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:07:12AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:29:16 +0200: > > > Linux companies are a necessary evil in my eyes. They're needed to > > > help prevent monopolies from drowning the so

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread ed tharp
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 05:08, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:40, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:59 +0200: > > > > > Aha. How about this: If a product is good, I don't care whether I have > > to pay for it or not, I'll get it. If the prod

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:25:08 +0200: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:40:51AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > Or whether cutting that tree is really necessary? Without knowing > anything about the guy who cuts the tree, he observer will not be able > to know. Up till now, Mandra

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread JM5379
>> No. That's *not* what I'm saying. Maybe I need to differentiate >> more: Mandrake makes one Linux distro, but many products. I've tested >> the distro, as packed in the product "9.1 download edition". I liked >> what I saw. It's a good distro. So I want to use it. At the same time, >> I *do* a

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Guy Van Sanden
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 12:40, ed tharp wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 05:08, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 09:40, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > > T. Ribbrock schrieb am Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:59 +0200: > > If I pay a subscription fee for those channels, the commercials are not > > a

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Guy Van Sanden
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 12:40, ed tharp wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 02:58, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:07:12AM +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > BSD would be a kernel just as linux is just a kernel. I bet 100%of the > companies using BSD and apache-PHP/mySQL on their webserver

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread ed tharp
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 07:58, Guy Van Sanden wrote: first off,, since the attributes are sure getting confusing, (obviously) I did not think I was replying to Guy, but to T.Ribbock. > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 12:40, ed tharp wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 05:08, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > > > On Mon,

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 15 Sep 2003 10:25 am, T. Ribbrock wrote: > That leaves only the product "download edition" if I do want the > distro, which is a pity. > I would have much more sympathy with your argument if you had at any point said 'so I'll take the download version and join the club' or 'make a dona

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread John Wilson
On September 15, 2003 02:25 am, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > You decide that as Mandrake is getting money from elsewhere you can take > > the free version. All I see from you is: If I have to pay, I won't take > > it, because Mandrake gets enough money from elsewhere. > > No. That's *not* what I'm sayi

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 15 Sep 2003 9:46 pm, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Monday 15 Sep 2003 10:25 am, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > That leaves only the product "download edition" if I do want > > > the distro, which is a pity. > > > > I would have much mor

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
T. Ribbrock wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 15 Sep 2003 10:25 am, T. Ribbrock wrote: That leaves only the product "download edition" if I do want the distro, which is a pity. I would have much more sympathy with your argument if you had

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread John Wilson
On September 15, 2003 02:29 pm, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > Happy now? > > (Apologies to those who *didn't* ask for this - I know it's not much > compared to the bigwigs) > > Thomas Actually yes. And in that case I withdraw my accusations of freeloading. But I repectfully still disagree with you.

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-15 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Sep 15, 2003 at 02:20:21PM +0200, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > > BSD would be a kernel just as linux is just a kernel. I bet 100%of the > > companies using BSD and apache-PHP/mySQL on their webserver would not be > > there without mySQL, how good is BSD without any of the programs that > > are p

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-16 Thread Guy Van Sanden
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 08:38, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Mon Sep 15, 2003 at 02:20:21PM +0200, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > > > > BSD would be a kernel just as linux is just a kernel. I bet 100%of the > > > companies using BSD and apache-PHP/mySQL on their webserver would not be > > > there without mySQL

Re: [expert] Re: Whoa there...

2003-09-16 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Sep 16, 2003 at 01:11:33PM +0200, Guy Van Sanden wrote: > > > > BSD would be a kernel just as linux is just a kernel. I bet 100%of the > > > > companies using BSD and apache-PHP/mySQL on their webserver would not be > > > > there without mySQL, how good is BSD without any of the programs th