Re: [expert] Reiserfs stability (was: Konqueror - https 'dies unexpectedly')

2001-05-29 Thread Stephen Boulet
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 09:44 pm, Civileme wrote: > To make it happen you install a / only system with lotsa unused space. The > / can be reiser--that's automatically a notail mount. But, if I understand it correctly, you can have a root reiser partition mounted without the notail option if yo

Re: [expert] Reiserfs stability (was: Konqueror - https 'dies unexpectedly')

2001-05-29 Thread Tom Lawton
Hi, > To make it happen you install a / only system with lotsa unused space. The > / can be reiser--that's automatically a notail mount. Oh dear. My system only has / and /home partitions, both are reiser. If the / is being automatically mounted notail anyway, it seems odd that it's the one

Re: [expert] Reiserfs stability (was: Konqueror - https 'dies unexpectedly')

2001-05-29 Thread Civileme
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 09:19, Tom Lawton wrote: > Hi, > > > Want to make Reiser more stable? Use only notail mounts. Of course > > that's a LOT more stable. > > Is this a suitable option for use on a bog standard workstation Manrdake > system? I know it's more space hungry (anyone know how much

Re[2]: [expert] Reiserfs stability (was: Konqueror - https 'dies unexpectedly')

2001-05-29 Thread Rusty Carruth
Tom Lawton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Want to make Reiser more stable? Use only notail mounts. Of course that's > > a LOT more stable. > > Is this a suitable option for use on a bog standard workstation Manrdake > system? I know it's more space hungry (anyone know how much?) - is

Re: [expert] Reiserfs stability (was: Konqueror - https 'dies unexpectedly')

2001-05-29 Thread Tom Lawton
Hi, > Want to make Reiser more stable? Use only notail mounts. Of course that's > a LOT more stable. Is this a suitable option for use on a bog standard workstation Manrdake system? I know it's more space hungry (anyone know how much?) - is it also slower? I'm imagining/hoping Reiser will