> > search teh expert archives for a thread on "cpp0"
> >
> > there was one about 2 weeks back
>
> You don't happen to know the subject of the thread? I searched the
> subjects back to May 24 (oldest message in the archive!) but did not
> find anything.
>
> wobo
Ugh... No Wobo... i'm sorry I do
On Saturday 15 June 2002 06:54 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 09:36, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> > installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> > list!
>
I originally ran into this pr
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 09:36, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> list!
>
> wobo
> --
Shame on you, Wobo. ;)
LX
--
°°°
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 14:53, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Naw, you can keep them. It would be only those yet to come...
>
> drjung
>
> --
Whoa. (!) Hey, you got Ed Tharp on the payroll or something, Dr J?
;)
LX
--
°°°
Kernel 2.4
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 09:07, darklord wrote:
>
> Hi wobo. I had this same thing happen to me under v8.2 when I tried to
> compile Mplayer. I went to the software (RPM) manager and installed
> everything that had anything to do with gcc 2.96 and it worked after that.
>
> PS What I can't tell y
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 10:02, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Every time I do a full install I always use package selection. I
> learned it the hard way back in my SuSE days (v. 4.4) when SuSE offered
> pre-selections like Mandrake does. Whenever I used one of those
> pre-fabricated package lists I had
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 09:34 -0500, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> > Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> > > installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> > > list!
> > >
>
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 09:34 -0500, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> > installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> > list!
> >
> > wobo
> > --
>
> That's ok, wobo. It c
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> list!
>
> wobo
> --
That's ok, wobo. It could happen to anybody. Just don't let it happen
again. The next time we'll take
On Saturday 15 June 2002 09:49 am, you wrote:
> On Saturday 15 June 2002 09:35 am, you wrote:
> > deveoler packages not selected durring install processes. (you know where
> > you click for "individule packege selection" the star for developer was
> > not hi-lited and so none of the developer pac
On Saturday 15 June 2002 09:36 am, you wrote:
> Thanks for answering. I just found that I missed that one RPM during
> installation. Should have found that by myself before writing to the
> list!
>
> wobo
Don't feel bad. I did exactly the same thing. I just assumed
(naughty-naughty!) that all c
On Saturday 15 June 2002 09:35 am, you wrote:
> deveoler packages not selected durring install processes. (you know where
> you click for "individule packege selection" the star for developer was
> not hi-lited and so none of the developer packages got installed. as always
> it is my suggestion
deveoler packages not selected durring install processes. (you know where you
click for "individule packege selection" the star for developer was not
hi-lited and so none of the developer packages got installed. as always it is
my suggestion that if you are trying to install with all bells and
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 09:24 -0400, darklord wrote:
> On Friday 14 June 2002 09:38 pm, you wrote:
>
> > You don't happen to know the subject of the thread? I searched the
> > subjects back to May 24 (oldest message in the archive!) but did not
> > find anything.
> >
> > wobo
>
> Hi. Well, I thi
On Friday 14 June 2002 09:38 pm, you wrote:
> You don't happen to know the subject of the thread? I searched the
> subjects back to May 24 (oldest message in the archive!) but did not
> find anything.
>
> wobo
Hi. Well, I think that was my thread, and it was something like "problems
compiling M
On Friday 14 June 2002 06:10 pm, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile memtester-2.93.1. After unpacking I started 'make'
> and it says:
>
> gcc -Wall -g -c -o memtest.o memtest.c
> gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'cpp0': File or Directory not found
> make: ***[memtest.0] Error 1
>
> I
> gcc -Wall -g -c -o memtest.o memtest.c
> gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'cpp0': File or Directory not found
> make: ***[memtest.0] Error 1
I've never heard of 'cpp' being pronounced 'cpp0' before :). Ever cince I
started using linux, the c preprocessor has always been 'cpp'. I suggest
m
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 18:27 -0600, FemmeFatale wrote:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 00:10 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to compile memtester-2.93.1. After unpacking I started 'make'
> > > and it says:
> >
> > > gcc -Wall -g -c -o me
Hi,
I'm trying to compile memtester-2.93.1. After unpacking I started 'make'
and it says:
gcc -Wall -g -c -o memtest.o memtest.c
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'cpp0': File or Directory not found
make: ***[memtest.0] Error 1
I installed all of the relevant devel apps. Did I miss one?
T
19 matches
Mail list logo
