Re: [expert] named: lame server?

2002-12-05 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Guntner wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:29:30PM -0800 : > > > So there are two name servers listed as authoritative for that domain. > > But if you query them, both respond with "." domain entries, which are > > the root dns entries. Since the

Re: [expert] named: lame server?

2002-12-05 Thread David Guntner
Todd Lyons grabbed a keyboard and wrote: > > David Guntner wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:47:21PM -0800 : > > > > Of late, I've been getting TONS of "named: lame server resolving " > > messages anytime a DNS lookup takes place locally. I've got the caching > > nameserver package installed

Re: [expert] named: lame server?

2002-12-05 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Guntner wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:47:21PM -0800 : Content-Description: Mail message body > Of late, I've been getting TONS of "named: lame server resolving " > messages anytime a DNS lookup takes place locally. I've got the caching

Re: [expert] named: lame server?

2002-12-05 Thread Vox
This time "David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> becomes daring and writes: > Of late, I've been getting TONS of "named: lame server resolving " > messages anytime a DNS lookup takes place locally. I've got the caching > nameserver package installed, with BIND9. ML 9.0. Anyone have any ide

[expert] named: lame server?

2002-12-05 Thread David Guntner
Of late, I've been getting TONS of "named: lame server resolving " messages anytime a DNS lookup takes place locally. I've got the caching nameserver package installed, with BIND9. ML 9.0. Anyone have any ideas what would be causing this? My syslog is starting to get really crowded