Yes, but -21 is out already. I'd go with that one. I had trouble with -18 (
no kernel-specific initrd.img)
Jay
On Sunday 09 September 2001 03:21, I was honored with this communique:
> Too many messsages, so little time.
>
> So the "zombie" was fixed in -18??
>
> -JMS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel 2.4.7
|
|
|"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
|>
|> Still don't know what you are talking about...
|>
|> Here's a printout...
|>
|> [opjose@bluebox opjose]$ su
|> Password:
|>
|> [root@bluebox opjose]# uname -a
|&g
"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
>
> Still don't know what you are talking about...
>
> Here's a printout...
>
> [opjose@bluebox opjose]$ su
> Password:
>
> [root@bluebox opjose]# uname -a
>
> Linux bluebox..com 2.4.8-18mdk #1 Tue Sep 4 10:08:58 EDT 2001 i686
> unknown
>
> [root@bluebox opjose]#
Still don't know what you are talking about...
Here's a printout...
[opjose@bluebox opjose]$ su
Password:
[root@bluebox opjose]# uname -a
Linux bluebox..com 2.4.8-18mdk #1 Tue Sep 4 10:08:58 EDT 2001 i686
unknown
[root@bluebox opjose]# ps -aux | grep Z
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RS
"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
>
> Ok, you lost me with the reference.
>
> What Zombie?
>
> -JMS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> |"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
> |>
> |> I went to 2.4.8-12mdk last night on a ReiserFS machine without any
> |> problems. (I did reserve a ext2 /boot partition originally though..
Expert wrote:
> I do it, how many Cooker Lurkers do we have?
How does a cooker user and a beta tester differ? I tried unsuccessfully
to get both 8.0 & 8.1B1 to install XFree correctly on my 7.1 machine,
and have 8.1B3 downloading right now.
--
"The highest glory of the American Revolution was t
: [expert] Kernel 2.4.7
|
|
|"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
|>
|> I went to 2.4.8-12mdk last night on a ReiserFS machine without any
|> problems. (I did reserve a ext2 /boot partition originally though...)
|>
|> -JMS
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|>
|
|So you now live with a zomb
On Friday 07 September 2001 09:54, chronos . wrote:
Hi all,
Had a quick question, when is version 8.1 supposed to be released to the
public ?
thanx,
chornos.
It will be released when it is ready. That means a good journaling
filesystem and most of the major bugs gone. No deadly showstop
(Raises hand)
I do it, how many Cooker Lurkers do we have?
On Friday 07 September 2001 09:30 am, so spoke Tom Brinkman:
> On Friday 07 September 2001 08:54 am, chronos . escribió:
> > Hi all,
> > Had a quick question, when is version 8.1 supposed to be released to
> > the public ? thanx,
> >
After messing with this stuff until 05:00 this morning, I noticed some
things that I hope will have been fixed before the real 8.1 ships.
On a box with only SCSI disks, if one goes into 'rescue' mode with
either 7.2 or 8.0, it'll for some reason realise there's a reiserfs
filesystem on the disks,
"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
>
> I went to 2.4.8-12mdk last night on a ReiserFS machine without any
> problems. (I did reserve a ext2 /boot partition originally though...)
>
> -JMS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
So you now live with a zombie :-) If you go to kernel 2.4.8-14, this
little creature will st
On Friday 07 September 2001 08:54 am, chronos . escribió:
> Hi all,
> Had a quick question, when is version 8.1 supposed to be released to
> the public ? thanx,
> chornos.
Beta 3 is just out, looks like the planned October release of 8.1 is
right on track. From lurking on the cooker list
The 8.1 release was stated around the end of september from a article on
another web site, but I could be off..
On Friday 07 September 2001 09:54 am, you wrote:
Content-Type: /; name="Attachment: 0"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
-
I thought I heard someone say end of September...
Edmund
-Original Message-
From: chronos . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel 2.4.7 release date
Hi all,
Had a quick question, when is version 8.1
Hi all,
Had a quick question, when is version 8.1 supposed to be released to the public ?
thanx,
chornos.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:25:50 -0400 Harold Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>with all the stuff with the kernel 2.4.7, I feel since Mandrake will soon be
>releasing the 8.1 version I'll
with all the stuff with the kernel 2.4.7, I feel since Mandrake will soon be
releasing the 8.1 version I'll update my whole system instead of bits and
pieces of it..
since it looks like the 8.1 release will have the 2.4.8 kernel to it and any
new or newer lib files also..
saves on problems as f
On Friday 07 September 2001 02:22 am, Jose M. Sanchez escribió:
> The software manager will download the upgraded RPM if used
> correctly.
>
> I had no trouble going to 2.4.8-12mdk via the installer. It "lilo'd"
> my system properly as well and picked up the PBM and other libraries
> needed for re
The main reason for initrd's is not filesystems. There aren't that much
important filesystems the kernel must know before loading modules and they can
easily be build into the kernel itself.
The reason are more the SCSI-Controllers, Network card (for network boot).
Since the kernel must have thes
, September 06, 2001 10:51 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel 2.4.7
|
|
|On Wed, 2001-09-05 at 15:01, Scott Thurmond wrote:
|> I used the software manager to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.7.
|>
|> I noticed the new files in my /boot directory, except the
|> initrd-2.
the headers and sources be
installed too.
-JMS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harold Hartley
|Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:21 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel 2.4.7
|
|
|do not u
Hi Scott,
Many distribution are very confuse (foolish), most distribution need this kind
of
file to load something in RAM first to function , e.g. some type of file
systems, but the kernel
of 2.4.7 seems not need to load some modules first and already bundled in,
e.g.
reiserfs file system, you
Dan Hensley wrote:
>> I wasn't able to use the 8.0 release for a fresh install since it had problems
>that >> the beta didn't (I have an nVidia video card). I don't recall all the
>problems I>> ran into.
> > You probly didn't have a ram disk for the 2.4.7 kernel.
> > --
> >
Thanks a bunch for this tip. That indeed was the problem. I did have a ram
disk in /boot that was symlinked properly, but it was for the 2.4.2 kernel, so
that caused problems. When I created one specifically for the 2.4.3-20mdk
kernel, that one was able to boot up fine. For some reason though,
On Thu Sep 06, 2001 at 08:51:03AM -0600, Dan Hensley wrote:
> > I used the software manager to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.7.
> >
> > I noticed the new files in my /boot directory, except the initrd-2.4.7*img
> > file.
> >
> > Do I have to change the links to point to the new kernel or
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:51 am, Dan Hensley escribió:
All I know is that when I updated with these RPMs, my
> system would not boot (see the archives with my posts in the last
> week or so). This is because I'm using Reiserfs, and the RPMs really
> screwed something up.
You probly d
On Wed, 2001-09-05 at 15:01, Scott Thurmond wrote:
> I used the software manager to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.7.
>
> I noticed the new files in my /boot directory, except the initrd-2.4.7*img
> file.
>
> Do I have to change the links to point to the new kernel or should the
> software
> > I used the software manager to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.7.
>
> I noticed the new files in my /boot directory, except the initrd-2.4.7*img
> file.
>
> Do I have to change the links to point to the new kernel or should the
> software installer have done that for me?
>
> -Scott
There
do not use the software manager to install it.
you need to install it manually...
instructions are on mandrake or pclinuxonline.com somewhere..
Harold
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 05:01 pm, you wrote:
> I used the software manager to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.7.
>
> I noticed the new
i guess now it is Praedor. here is the excerpt from
the changelog of mdk 2.4.7
- Supermount is here again (and ppc shouldn't need
additional patches anymore).
cheers
--- Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So...does kernel 2.4.7-12mdk have supermount support
> in it yet? This is the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Praedor Tempus
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: Mandrake Expert
> Subject: [expert] kernel-2.4.7 supermount?
>
>
> So...does kernel 2.4.7-12mdk have supermount support in it
> yet
As of now there is no 2.4.7 kernel from Mandrake - I downloaded it from
kernel.org after another in this list told me supermount was in it and
working. He was mistaken...perhaps not knowing what supermount was/is.
I even tried transfering the supermount "stuff" from my 2.4.3-20mdk source
di
ok thanks for the info. i actually have mdk8 on my
desktop and i do certainly agree that supermount
should be part of the kernel. if there is a group
demanding for that ... i would certainly be part of it
=)
my desktop is running MDK 8 with 2.4.3-20mdk kernel...
and supermount is running fine. i
Supermount is not quite the same. It takes autofs a step further. If you
read up on the patch information you will see that many think it is a great
feature and many hope that it will make it into the kernel proper rather than
be a patch.
Supermount makes using the supermount volume absolute
how is supermount different from autofs?
doesnt autofs/automounter achieve the same thing?
and yes, there is really no option for supermount on
the new kernel.
--- Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Err...unfortunately, supermount support does not
> exist in this kernel. I
> have dow
Err...unfortunately, supermount support does not exist in this kernel. I
have downloaded it and have xconfig up right now and there is no option to
enable supermount.
[...]
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > Up until the 2.4.6 kernel (I am not certain about 2.4.5 because I ne
I have some curios things, while im compiling Kernel 2.4.7 too.
I was glad to see that there was a built in module for my new networkcard
(rtl), but after i'm made 'make mrproper' this option disappers. it
wasn't available whether in menuconfig nor xconfig. xconfig shows always
some
strange be
hi
supermount is a pseudo-filesystem which manages
filesystems on removable media like floppy disks and
CD-ROMs. i think that enabling support for
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS while compiling the kernel will
enable support for such.
dianne
--- Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't answer the so
Can't answer the sound question - except ARE the modules actually in their
appropriate location? Other than the "make modules && make modules_install"
bit just mentioned.
What I really want to know is does the 2.4.7 kernel have supermount support
available to it?
On Friday 27 July 2001 10
just curious, did you make modules and make
modules_install after the compile of the kernel?
--- "Leonardo T. de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've got a 2.4.7 kernel up and runnig yesterday (on
> the 2nd try!
> =o) ) and got some odd problems.
> The sou
39 matches
Mail list logo
