On Thu Jan 18, 2001 at 05:35:50PM -0500, b5dave wrote:
> Okay, well the Security Announce is working for me gain; just got the
> glibc advisory. Thanks for the work Vincent, and sorry if I was overly
> critical.
I understand the concern, Dave, believe me! Especially in light of
this worm (talk
On Wed Jan 17, 2001 at 01:47:49PM -0600, duane voth wrote:
> My intention is not to critizise but to offer an idea and
> help balance the sense of urgency.
I understand.
> >> One expects to be the first notified
> >> of Mandrake security issues when one is subscribed to
> >> Mandrake's security
Okay, well the Security Announce is working for me gain; just got the
glibc advisory. Thanks for the work Vincent, and sorry if I was overly
critical.
Dave.
Vincent wrote:
> At this point the going is slow to find a fix because that individual
> is gone for the week, but rest assured we are try
My intention is not to critizise but to offer an idea and
help balance the sense of urgency.
Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 04:23:15PM -0500, b5dave wrote:
>> One expects to be the first notified
>> of Mandrake security issues when one is subscribed to
>> Mandrake's security-annou
Vincent,
Vincent Danen wrote:
> ago. If this has been going on for a month, then someone should have
> said something. However, on the same token, two individuals now have
> indicated that they did in fact recieve messages, so it makes it even
> more unclear. Unfortunately, the timing is very
On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 04:23:15PM -0500, b5dave wrote:
> > No, that is not the case at all. It's not useless and it's not
> > dangerous. We're just having some difficulty with it.
>
> Sorry, but I must disagree. One expects to be the first notified
> of Mandrake security issues when one is sub
Vincent,
> No, that is not the case at all. It's not useless and it's not
> dangerous. We're just having some difficulty with it.
Sorry, but I must disagree. One expects to be the first notified
of Mandrake security issues when one is subscribed to
Mandrake's security-announce. There's an impl
On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 06:52:58PM +, bascule wrote:
> fwiw i had a whole a load on jan11th plus one today and others previous, does
> this mean that may be some i have missed or are only some folk not seeming to
> get them?
You got a whole bunch? Do you recall what they were for? I poste
fwiw i had a whole a load on jan11th plus one today and others previous, does
this mean that may be some i have missed or are only some folk not seeming to
get them?
bascule
On Tuesday 16 January 2001 4:45 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Matthew Micene wrote:
> > Has
On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 11:32:02AM -0500, b5dave wrote:
> > Has anyone else been seeing traffic on the Security lists?
>
> I joined both the Mandrake security announce and security discuss lists
> just before the new year, and there was some brief traffic. Since then,
> however, nothing. Last wee
On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 12:10:49PM -0500, b5dave wrote:
> if it's any help, the last advisory I got was the "slocate" one of
> Dec 18/2000.
Yeah, that's what I've been told. I think it's sympa rejecting mail
based on "no-no" words like un_subsc_ribe (underscores are there to
prevent this messag
if it's any help, the last advisory I got was the "slocate" one of
Dec 18/2000.
dave.
> We're looking into it. I have my suspicions that something has
> changed with sympa and it is rejecting the mails silently so this
> didn't actually come to my attention until about two days ago. We
> hope
On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Matthew Micene wrote:
> Has anyone else been seeing traffic on the Security lists? I have seen
> several posts on Bugtraq from Mandrake Security about updates but nothing
> on the Mandrake lists. Anyone have any ideas?
We're looking into it. I have
Matthew,
> Has anyone else been seeing traffic on the Security lists?
I joined both the Mandrake security announce and security discuss lists
just before the new year, and there was some brief traffic. Since then,
however, nothing. Last week linuxtoday (http://www.linuxtoday.com/) was
full of Ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
