Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-03 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:56 -0900, civileme wrote: > > I had a mandrake box with me, with a 40x12x48 CDRW and a very pedestrian SiS > 630 chipset with a 1G Celeron and 256M Memory. I started burning a CD, then > added an edit of a big text file (with OpenOffice) and configuring the > machine

Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-03 Thread civileme
On Monday 03 February 2003 04:13 am, et wrote: > On Monday 03 February 2003 01:29 am, James Sparenberg wrote: > > BTW how is win2000 never tried it > > (seriously) > > let me tell you about a OS that bites... > I run a SMP box, (p3 1000s) that is sweet with Mandrake SMP, and I used to > show people

Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-03 Thread et
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:29 am, James Sparenberg wrote: > BTW how is win2000 never tried it > (seriously) let me tell you about a OS that bites... I run a SMP box, (p3 1000s) that is sweet with Mandrake SMP, and I used to show people how much slower winME was on the same box, (knowing full we

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 21:38, Robert Wideman wrote: > >> > My two cents on where Linux in general and Mandrake specifically needs > >> > to go for modern laptops is full ACPI support, cpufreq or similar, and > >> > swsusp or an ACPI-based suspend. It's kind of annoying to have to halt > >> > and res

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Robert Wideman
>> BTW how is win2000 never tried it Usaability, a monkey can use/admin it easily. Security, its a M$ product, security?...HAHA. I used to run it as my desktop (Win2k Server) but then i bought an ATI 7500 AIW and the TV Tuner software would NOT install on a Server b/c of Terminal Services. Thei

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 21:36, Robert Wideman wrote: > >> Actually I do know how to do my research but that aside. > > Ye, no joke. I wasnt meaning to be bash anyone. > > >> It is because > >> of research that I've used the cards I've used. All four where > >> supported under the 2.2 kernel! > >

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Robert Wideman
>> > My two cents on where Linux in general and Mandrake specifically needs >> > to go for modern laptops is full ACPI support, cpufreq or similar, and >> > swsusp or an ACPI-based suspend. It's kind of annoying to have to halt >> > and restart a laptop instead of suspend and awaken it. These are L

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Robert Wideman
>> Actually I do know how to do my research but that aside. Ye, no joke. I wasnt meaning to be bash anyone. >> It is because >> of research that I've used the cards I've used. All four where >> supported under the 2.2 kernel! Now you state which kernel you were using, would have been helpful e

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 20:48, Jack Coates wrote: > On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 20:29, James Sparenberg wrote: > > Actually I do know how to do my research but that aside. It is because > > of research that I've used the cards I've used. All four where > > supported under the 2.2 kernel! so ... 2 whe

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 20:29, James Sparenberg wrote: > Actually I do know how to do my research but that aside. It is because > of research that I've used the cards I've used. All four where > supported under the 2.2 kernel! so ... 2 where cardbus (DWL-650 and > and orinoco gold.) 2 were 16 b

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread James Sparenberg
Rob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Greenwood > Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 4:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1 > > > I agree 100%. The other

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Robert Wideman
Another thing that has been done/updated to the 2.5 kernel.  You guys do NOT know how to do your research and are requiring things NOW that is almost impossible to do overnight.  Most companies have not given their HW specs to open source programmers and therefore have to reverse engineer an

RE: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Robert Wideman
day, February 02, 2003 7:25 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1 >> >> >> On Sunday 02 February 2003 05:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: >> [...] >> > The one point that is an extreme weakness for all the distro&

Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
On Sunday 02 February 2003 05:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: [...] > The one point that is an extreme weakness for all the distro's and > should be a natural for MDK is with laptops. I for one have been > struggling mightily with wirelss for 2 weeks. Still haven't gottne it > to work right been th

Re: [expert] Wishes for Mandrake and 9.1

2003-02-02 Thread Jason Greenwood
I agree 100%. The other thing that MUST work well is USB and hotplugging. I will not go into my trials and experiences here but suffice it to say that as of 9.0 USB detection needed some help. I KNOW this is partially due to hardware vendors not always following standard USB protocols (eg USB M