I think they need to learn to make good iso images first
i've downloaded beta2 and beta 3 both are screwed up.
Ralph
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce E. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 3:17 PM
Subject: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
> When will
no on the kde2 maybe next version
kde2 is still in early beta and not real stable yet but getting there
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Hello listmembers,
> Can anyone tell me if 7.1 installs KDE2 and Kongueror? I'm so tired of
> Netscape I could spit!
> Thanks,
> Gene
Neither.
I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
>From: "Eugene C. Zesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
>Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:46:11 -05
On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote:
> Neither.
> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
>
I find it's a genralized feeling, although I've never used it. I prefer
Mozilla but it still crashes too much.
L
--
Laurent Dupe
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 11:25:29AM -0400, TK Kim wrote:
-> Neither.
-> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
-> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
Cool. Let us know when it is available for Linux.
--
-- C^2
No windows were cra
I know - I run win4lin which is $49.00 just so that I can run IE5 on my Linux
My problems is Plug-ins ie: Macromedia Shockwave & Flash.
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, TK Kim wrote:
> Neither.
> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot bet
hi !
nope...no kde 2 on 7.1 , but we are getting there :-)
"Eugene C. Zesch" wrote:
Hello listmembers,
Can anyone tell me if 7.1 installs KDE2 and
Kongueror? I'm so tired of
Netscape I could spit!
Thanks,
Gene
--
--
Best Regard's ,
You won't get killed here...I agree!
But hopefully Konquerer will be that replacement :)
Bambi
TK Kim wrote:
> Neither.
> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
>
> >From: "Eugene C. Zesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Eugene C. Zesch" wrote:
>
> Hello listmembers,
> Can anyone tell me if 7.1 installs KDE2 and Kongueror? I'm so tired of
> Netscape I could spit!
> Thanks,
> Gene
Nope...
Go here
ftp://ftp.linux.tucows.com/pub/distribution/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/RPMS
and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote:
> > Neither.
> > I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> > saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
> >
Well I have seen people with IE 5.5 trying to uninstall to get
back to 5, but the 5 I saw worki
TK Kim wrote:
> Neither.
> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
>
You wont get an argument from me. I haven't used IE5 yet, I bailed from
windows for linux around IE4 and IE4 is still on the kids computer. No
Hi, Civileme
I beg to differ with you. IE 5 with only security upgrades
and toys from MS and all the plugins you could want worked great
on my machineincluding a MS Agent toy to read me web pages,
not the Bonzi Buddy (annoying), just a simple MS Agent script
that would open your default Agen
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 02:57:28PM -0800, Civileme wrote:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-> >
-> > On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote:
-> > > Neither.
-> > > I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
-> > > saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
-> > >
->
-> Well I hav
> -> > On 12 Jun, TK Kim wrote:
> -> > > Neither.
> -> > > I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> -> > > saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
Actually, the Netscape-package as shipped with helium is quite nice. Just
make sure the required compat-lib
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 - TK Kim, you wrote:
| Neither.
| I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
| saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
I simply use KDE's file manager to read web pages. kfm does not do all the
tricks the big guys do, but it can
TK Kim wrote:
>
> Neither.
> I am kinda sick of Netscape, too. I am probably gonna have to pay for
> saying this, but IE5 is a wholelot better browser.
Everybody is answering, so why not me too. :)
I think you need to define "better". IE is in many ways superior as far
as HTML rendering is con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know were I can downloade Mandrake 7.1 for
> i386?
>
> Joergen Traun
Joergenthere are no versions of Linux Mandrake for the
i386 as they are all compiled for the i586. However there
is an i486 version of Linux Mandrake 7.0-2. Below is one
of the loc
ED]]On Behalf Of Alan
> Shoemaker
> Sent: 26 February 2001 08:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Does anyone know were I can downloade Mandrake 7.1 for
> > i386?
> >
> > Joergen Traun
>
> J
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
My take on this is that the kernel in the distribution includes compiled in
support for i-386, however should Joergen want to just have an i-386 kernel
he can recompile then from the sources?
regards
Daryl
> -Original Message-
>
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Milnes Terry SSgt
> 52LSS/LGLOE
> Sent: 26 February 2001 10:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
>
>
> Actually Mandrakesoft compiles almost everything using the i686 flag. Th
ROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Milnes Terry SSgt
> > 52LSS/LGLOE
> > Sent: 26 February 2001 10:03
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [expert] Mandrake 7.1
> >
> >
> > Actually Mandrakesoft compiles almost everything using the i686 flag. This
> > way ev
El Lun 26 Feb 2001 16:46, escribiste:
> What ever happened to 7.1?? One day i was browsing through 7.1 RPMS on a
> mirror site and the next day they were all gone and i couldn't find any
> mention of 7.1 ANYWHERE. It's like it never existed. (I know it did exist
Hey my friend, before you go crazy
Thank you Pedro!
I found the iso but apparently www.tuxfind.com doesn't exist! A whois and nslookup
claim that
tuxfind.com is not a registered host/domain! I'll try again later.
Anyway, thanks :-)
j
--- Pedro Del Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Lun 26 Feb 2001 16:46, escribiste:
> > Wha
On Tue Feb 27 2001 01:51, You wrote:
> Thank you Pedro!
>
> I found the iso but apparently www.tuxfind.com doesn't exist! A whois and
> nslookup claim that tuxfind.com is not a registered host/domain! I'll try
> again later.
>
Ups I'm very sorry. The url is www.tuxfinder.com
--
Best Regards,
OH MY GOD. I have been needing something like tuxfinder.com for a while now! It's
funny how these
things can exist and we do/don't find out about it.
Thank you very much,
j
--- Pedro Del Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Feb 27 2001 01:51, You wrote:
> > Thank you Pedro!
> >
> > I foun
On Tue Feb 27 2001 13:01, You wrote:
> OH MY GOD. I have been needing something like tuxfinder.com for a while
> now! It's funny how these things can exist and we do/don't find out about
> it.
>
I should mention www.rpmfind.net too
and www.google.com it is a good place to start from
--
Cheers,
Yes, rpmfind.net and google i use constantly. Well, i don't always use rpmfind so much
but i know
about it. I like tuxfinder.com because it finds .gz and so many other extensions.
thanks again :-)
j
--- Pedro Del Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Feb 27 2001 13:01, You wrote:
> > OH MY
Dear Alan and friends:
My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes,
it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or LinuxMall. Glad I threw in the URL with
the right address.
Benjamin
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> Benjaminyes, exactly! LinuxLand is where I ordered my 7.1
> 2 CD set
BenjaminI really don't think that 'deep apologies' are
necessary. :-) And maybe I was the only one that was
confused, duh!
Alan
Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> Dear Alan and friends:
>
> My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes,
> it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or Li
Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> Dear Alan and friends:
>
> My deep apologies for getting myself and everybody else confused. Yes,
> it's LinuxLand, NOT LinuxMart or LinuxMall. Glad I threw in the URL with
> the right address.
>
> Benjamin
>
> Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> >
> > Benjaminyes, exactly! L
Tom Berkley wrote:
>
> I tried to use the menu update command in the 7.1 mandrake (kde 1.2)
> desktop and got the message menu edit not installed. After looking for a
> while nothing stood out. If anyone can enlighten me about which rpm
> contains the kde menu editor (note this is 7.1 not 7.2), I
Chris Abiad wrote:
> In my house, we've got a cable modem (from @Home) coming into a Win98
> machine (I know...) running Sygate that's doing the network address
> translation (IP Masquerading/routing/proxying/whatever) for us. This
> machine has two NICs. One goes out to @Home, the other comes
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote:
> I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW
Mine is a DawiControl with SymbiosLogic chip
>
> SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X CD-ROM
Mine is a Plextor UltraPlex40max
As CDRW I have a Plextor PlexWriter 4/2/2
> When I boot the Mandrake 7.1
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Robert Fox wrote:
= I have installed 7.1 several times on several machines without much
= hassle. But my main system which worked perfectly with 7.0 won't allow me
= to install with 7.1
=
= I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW
=
= SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X CD-
Thanks. Nice to hear I'm not alone in the world!
At 11:43 PM 7/31/2000 +0200, you wrote:
>
>On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote:
>
> > I have the following: Adaptec 2940 UW
>
>Mine is a DawiControl with SymbiosLogic chip
> >
> > SCSI ID 3 is a Plextor PX-32TS 32X CD-ROM
>
>Mi
- Original Message -
From: "Wolfgang Bornath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake 7.1 and SCSI install probs
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 21:49 +0200, Robert Fox wrote:
>
> > I ha
Benjaminyes, exactly! LinuxLand is where I ordered my 7.1
2 CD set as well.
But because you said your 7.1 CD set was coming from LinuxMart
in your original posting (and now again in this posting, but
this time you left a clue, the URL to LinuxLand) I was amazed.
Why?! Because I hadn't be
I just type
hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda
for the first ide drive
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any
> good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake
> from Red hat when 7.1 came out. One
Hi Paul, I am running NT4.0 and Linux 7.0-2 smp mode on the ide3 port.
Nt is on hde drive, and linux is on the second drive at hdf. I do not
have any hard drives on the ide1 ide2 or ide4 ports. My CD-ROMS are on
ide1 port, and this setup works very well. I have a very stable system,
and am us
Vic wrote:
>
> I just type
>
> hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda
>
> for the first ide drive
>
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any
> > good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake
> > fro
>> > Hi all,
>> > I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any
>> > good answer to it in the archives. I recently decided to switch to Mandrake
>> > from Red hat when 7.1 came out. One of the statements I saw sent around about it
>> > was that it natively supported the
Hmmm well actually hda is not on the hpt366 its drive hde
In anyevent I tried that on hde and after a few seconds this is what happens:
[root@gratz1 /root]# hde: timeout waiting for DMA
ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 12
hde: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekCo
[snip]
>
> recompile for 386 code, kernel and driver.
>
> The Seagate IDE drive is marginal at the timing and signal gating
> requirements of 586 code and often locks up. So do MOST WDs,
> though some of them will work without the Xxx parm and often run
> close to the UDMA66 speed required.
>
Hey all,
I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of
cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that
comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm now getting about 6 times the
performance out of my UDMA66 drive. The kernel doesn't have t
Could you tell us, step by step, how you did this?
Thank You
Paul Gratz wrote:
> Hey all,
> I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of
> cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that
> comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm no
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Vic wrote:
> >
> > I just type
> >
> > hdparm -c3d1 /dev/hda
> >
> > for the first ide drive
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I hope this doesn't cover too well trod ground but I couldn't find any
> > > good answer to it in the arc
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Hey all,
> I just wanted to follow up and tell how I got it to work. Its kind of
> cheating but I downloaded the Gentus distribution and stole the kernel that
> comes with it and put it in my mandrake 7.1. I'm now getting about 6 times the
> performance out of m
It is an old problem. You should set BIOS setting of PCMCIA to
"cardbus" or "PCMCIA", but not "auto".
Sunday, June 11, 2000, 1:26:18 AM, you wrote:
d> Hi,
d> I have installed Mandrake 7.1 (via FTP) to my laptop, however, bootup
d> hangs when it reaches the Loading PCMCIA Modules part. If I dis
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> Hi, folks
>
> After running smoothly about five days, my linux box finally hangs up with
> screen saver program. I remember it happens several times before.
>
> Software Environment:
> Mandrake7.1 with Helix GNOME lastest version, Xscreensaver
>
> Any ideas to
49 matches
Mail list logo
