Slava Pestov wrote:
> Try this:
>
> USE: size-of
> "size-of" help-lint
>
> We need this to pass so that binaries can be made.
Slava,
On my system, it passes. I also noticed that the build report for
linux-32, linux-64, and windows all don't list 'size-of' in the help
lint portion of the repo
Adam wrote:
> What tool in linux generated the report?
It's called 'HardInfo'.
Ed
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=368
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Ed,
Try this:
USE: size-of
"size-of" help-lint
We need this to pass so that binaries can be made.
Slava
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/s
Ed,
What tool in linux generated the report?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Slava,
>
> I recently started working on a different computer. It's an older
> machine so I'm running a light weight Linux distro on it, Puppy Linux
> 4.12. The good news is performance of Fact
Slava,
Here's an example of corruption in the ui listener:
http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/921/factorlistenertextcorruko4.png
Ed
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tel
Slava,
This is a reliable way to reproduce the screen corruption bug on my system:
{ "find" "/etc" } run-process/result popup-process-window
Those words are available in the git-tool vocab.
Ed
--
This SF.net email
Dan> This is my philosophy too. I do use locals sometimes, but
Dan> typically only one or two locals words per vocabulary. The
Dan> version without locals is usually cleaner, I find.
Same here, mostly. I think a good knowledge of the libraries really
helps for writing clean stack code, because thi
Slava,
I recently started working on a different computer. It's an older
machine so I'm running a light weight Linux distro on it, Puppy Linux
4.12. The good news is performance of Factor on this machine is quite
good. The bad news is, there's occasional screen corruption issues in
the Factor
Slava Pestov wrote:
> kib2 in the IRC channel made a very nice FUEL cheat sheet:
>
> http://kib2.free.fr/temp/FUEL_cheatsheet.pdf
Indeed, it's very slick!
But don't forget, the FUEL README file also has a quick reference.
Jose, I noticed that the README is set to switch to org-mode. This is
a
Hi all,
kib2 in the IRC channel made a very nice FUEL cheat sheet:
http://kib2.free.fr/temp/FUEL_cheatsheet.pdf
Slava
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http
This is my philosophy too. I do use locals sometimes, but typically
only one or two locals words per vocabulary. The version without
locals is usually cleaner, I find.
Dan
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM, V. Glenn Tarcea wrote:
> Sam,
>
> Interesting in sites :-)
>
> I find I only use Locals whe
C-cC-xw will ask for a word (with default the one whose definition
you're at) a new name, and rename all its usages (asking for
confirmation), or at least all its usages known to factor. After
substitution, you can use the standard emacs command C-xs to save all
modified buffers.
Thanks!
---
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> experiments, even if I would prefer the Factor standard library to be
> more in a stack-oriented style.
You're forgetting that Ed also invented the cleave combinators, which
have significantly cleaned up pure stack code, and eliminated many
Patches below implement cross-references for vocabularies. In factor
buffers, when you press C-cM-< or C-cM-> with point on a vocab, you'll
get a list of vocabularies using or, respectively, used by the vocab at
point. You can also use M-x fuel-vocab-uses, M-x fuel-vocab-usage to get
a prompt with
Sam,
Interesting in sites :-)
I find I only use Locals when I end up in a word where I have to do a lot of
stack shuffling, and breaking the word down further doesn't really work. I
find Locals interesting because they give you the best of both worlds and
allow you to switch between the two on an
> "Glenn" == V Glenn Tarcea writes:
Glenn> I really like how Factor allows either usage, even though it
Glenn> creates a tension between the two styles.
I personally dislike Eduardo's style, as it leads to code which looks
too complicated to me and I think that it encourages longer
words. Wh
Hi Eduardo,
I've noticed in a lot of the examples you post that you make extensive use
of locals. I'm curious if this is a common idiom you use (as opposed to
being common to the code you post), and if so what you see as the benefits
vs. working off the stack without named variables.
I really lik
Slava,
In git-tool, I need to run a process (various git commands) and have
access to stdout and stderr as streams. As far as I know, there is no
way to do this via the 'io.launcher' vocabulary. I'm using the following
word to achieve this:
-
A list of pending changes in my repo. The last one gives you the option
to choose how links in xref buffers (callers, callees, etc.) are
followed (in the same buffer, other window or frame).
M-x customize-variable fuel-xref-follow-link-method
Thanks!
---
The following changes since com
> "Jason" == Jason Merrill writes:
Jason> Not sure if I've done this pull request correctly. If not,
Jason> guidance appreciated.
I generally use "git request-pull" to prepare the pull request text.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- s...@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
