Last week, it happened almost right away just browsing the docs. It happened
to me twice.
Today, I did a fresh install again, and I can't seem to reproduce the crash.
This time I was only using Help.
Before I had been interacting with the Listener, and probably ran the "tetris"
deploy-tool te
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jim mack wrote:
> Newbie question: I have been using screen to start factor listener. Is
> there any way a factor listener could keep going, and yet not show as a
> detached screen? I had assumed not, so had been relying on the presence of
> a screen running fac
Will do. To get going, I had been running as root (which I know is bad, but
I could get it working) I am now trying to start using port forwarding, so
I'll try to make sure that isn't what's causing this.
Newbie question: I have been using screen to start factor listener. Is
there any way a fa
Except, Factor already sets the REUSE flag with setsockopt. So maybe you have
a Factor running in the background? Can you make a test case?
Doug
On Nov 15, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jim mack wrote:
> Thank you! I was looking at this more as a potential regression in factor,
> but I think it more pr
>
>
> Someone please check the following statements for accuracy:
>
> A == remote repo
>
> B == local repo
>
> C == local working directory including by definition the local repo (.git
> directory)
>
> 1) *clone* copies compressed files from a remote repo to a local repo,creates
> remote-tracking
Thank you! I was looking at this more as a potential regression in factor,
but I think it more productive to look at it as my noobieness on *nx.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Jeff C. Britton wrote:
> See pitfall #3 in this link
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-sockpit/
Shaping --
If you do embark on the effort you propose below, I would be happy to work on
it with you (although I would think you would want to find at least one old
hand to participate as well). What you describe is very close to what I intend
for my own factor-like environment that I descri
See pitfall #3 in this link
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-sockpit/
I cannot help with applying this knowledge to the Factor API.
--Jeff
From: Jim mack [mailto:j...@less2do.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 11:56 AM
To: factor-ta
Shaping --
If you switch to some other forum to troubleshoot your git issues, could you
please post a message here telling us where it is. I am following this
discussion (and would like to continue to do so) to save myself some pain and
aggravation when I go through the same process.
Thanks.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Shaping wrote:
> I'm also thinking that the stack-effect data could be more binding than it
> currently is. I noticed while compiling some new words that the compiler
> will infer a stack-effect, and tell you when you've written it incorrectly.
> This looks almos
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Shaping wrote:
> I just completed a fresh cloning of the Factor origin repo and a build of
> factor.exe. I opened the Listener, and evaluated load-all. When the
> load-all completed, I saw only this:
I don't know enough about site-watcher to say what the exact pr
I imagine that someone has seen the problem before and already knows the issue.
Has anyone tried to verify a fresh clone and seen this problem? I suppose it
doesn't matter much, if the problem still exists for all of us, and hasn't
caused any problems. Then, again, I may be the only one d
> Can someone explain this? How serious a problem is this? Does it indicate
> corruption in my local repo?
>
> Would it be possible to keep out-of-topic questions out of this list (this
> one should be posted on a git users mailing-list since it has nothing to do
> with Factor)? They seem to
2010/11/15 Shaping
>
> Can someone explain this? How serious a problem is this? Does it indicate
> corruption in my local repo?
>
Would it be possible to keep out-of-topic questions out of this list (this
one should be posted on a git users mailing-list since it has nothing to do
with Factor)?
I did a Repository -> Verify Database. Git GUI took about 10 seconds to
produce this list of warnings:
warning in tree 04844ac88050a91b0be01a982069f56b68ec8fc3: contains
zero-padded file modes
warning in tree 19a3572612d83fabcd651a83283f3d055c07667a: contains
zero-padded file modes
warning in tr
I just completed a fresh cloning of the Factor origin repo and a build of
factor.exe. I opened the Listener, and evaluated load-all. When the
load-all completed, I saw only this:
webapps.site-watcher:
The image refers to a library or symbol that was not found at load time
:c produces
Possibly helpful: not-on-a-branch is a place you can land partway
through a rebase / merge process.
It can be painful to get your head around the git way of doing things,
if you have already worked with systems that use the CVS-SVN model.
Among other things, you are used to thinking of merge
There is a subfolder in my work folder called .git This is what I think of
as the repository.
Yes. But this is a source of some confusion. I think of the .git directory
as the repo, too, and the directory that includes it as the working
directory, into which the compressed code in .git is unco
I don't want to publish my changes anytime soon, only distinguish them from
released clean-branch code, so that I can track both.
If you get tired of so much standing in your way of going forward, consider
doing manual things with these files, old-school (rename/move them, checkout
so you have
19 matches
Mail list logo
