Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-13 Thread Hugh Aguilar
> > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:07:47 +0200 > From: Samuel Tardieu > Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book > To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <87iqelcyws@willow.rfc1149.net> > Content-Type: text/

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-11 Thread Chris Double
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Adam wrote: > Somewhere in extra is an 8080 emulator written by Chris Double that > can even play simple game ROMs like Space Invaders. I even had it running an 8080 Forth, inside Factor. > If it has fallen out of maintenance it will be in the unmaintained > fold

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-11 Thread Adam
Somewhere in extra is an 8080 emulator written by Chris Double that can even play simple game ROMs like Space Invaders. If it has fallen out of maintenance it will be in the unmaintained folder in the main source tree. On 10/11/09, Samuel Tardieu wrote: >> "Hugh" == Hugh Aguilar writes: > >

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-11 Thread Samuel Tardieu
> "Hugh" == Hugh Aguilar writes: Hugh> Forth only ships a relative handful of words that have Hugh> been found to be widely useful. One of these is star-slash the Hugh> scalar. It is called that because it is typically used for scaling Hugh> integer arithmetic. You use continued fractions to

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-11 Thread Hugh Aguilar
> Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:48:53 -0500 > From: Doug Coleman > Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book > To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <3a2525b0-76e7-4815-8641-f537d742e...@gmail.com> > Content-Type:

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-10 Thread Chris Double
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Hugh Aguilar wrote: > I have an updated version. Please read it through all the way, rather than > just go to the new sections, as there is a lot of rewriting throughout. > Thanks for your continued help in improving this documentation. Have you read any of the p

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-10 Thread William Tanksley, Jr
Doug Coleman wrote: > In your book, you state that you know about the */ word in Forth, > allowing you to quickly solve the resistor problem.  Why not go the > whole hog and ship a new word in every Forth implementation: > : *+/ ( x y -- z ) 2dup + */ ; Doug, I see your purpose and appreciate it;

Re: [Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-10 Thread Doug Coleman
Hi Hugh, In your book, you state that you know about the */ word in Forth, allowing you to quickly solve the resistor problem. Why not go the whole hog and ship a new word in every Forth implementation: : *+/ ( x y -- z ) 2dup + */ ; This directly solves the problem -- any competent Forth p

[Factor-talk] "Factor Versus Forth" --- the book

2009-10-10 Thread Hugh Aguilar
I have an updated version. Please read it through all the way, rather than just go to the new sections, as there is a lot of rewriting throughout. Thanks for your continued help in improving this documentation. The dvi is here: www.rosycrew.org/FactorVsForth.dvi The pdf is here: www.rosycrew.org