Good evening gentlefolks,
On 19/03/14 15:42, factor-talk-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:44:07 +0100
> From: Bj?rn Lindqvist
> Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] manual memory management and STRUCT:
> To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.n
2014-03-18 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jon Harper :
> In this case, it's more complicated then a single with-destructor scope,
> because I use the destructors to call libyaml's destroy function on the
> struct, so that the same memory can be reused between the calls to libyaml
> for this struct. So I really ne
In this case, it's more complicated then a single with-destructor scope,
because I use the destructors to call libyaml's destroy function on the
struct, so that the same memory can be reused between the calls to libyaml
for this struct. So I really need to destroy it right away before the next
call
Hi Jon,
2014-03-17 21:57 GMT+01:00 Jon Harper :
> Hi list,
> I am working with libyaml, a C library to parse yaml docs. Some libyaml
> functions give string results by malloc'ing memory and giving back pointers
> to those strings in a struct. They then require the caller to call a libyaml
> "destr
Hi list,
I am working with libyaml, a C library to parse yaml docs. Some libyaml
functions give string results by malloc'ing memory and giving back pointers
to those strings in a struct. They then require the caller to call a
libyaml "destroy" function on the struct that frees the strings.
I would
