--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 7:00:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[MDixon wrote:]
> > Bush asked about his son, not about Senator Webb's feelings.
> > Bush already knows what Webb wants. Who the h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
> > Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably
> > impossible and probably counter-indicated anyway.
> >
> So, you're saying that posting plans to murder
> teachers and students
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fair
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:42:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Driving terrorist underground, unable to communicate openly and glorify
> > their activities would make it harder for them to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:21:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> It was thoughtful of Bush to recognize Lance Corporal Webb's
> service towards
> > his father. Of course Webb could have said
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 7:14:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Excellent! Well thought out and well said. Notice Newt did not
> say "let me"
> > make the new rules. He said we should all wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 8:27:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>
>> In a message dated 11/29/06 6:22:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
>>
>> This is a serious problem that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are
> > All You Need Is Love.
> >
> I'll save this one. The next time we have a major
> attack on the homeland, I'll throw back in your face.
>
All you need is to love Osama?
Bhairitu wrote:
> Before we continue any further discussion please
> define who you mean by the term "terrorists."
>
Those who deliberately murder innocent women and chidren at weddings
and funerals?
sparaig wrote:
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably
> impossible and probably counter-indicated anyway.
>
So, you're saying that posting plans to murder
teachers and students is a form of free speech.
Bhairitu wrote:
> We've seen what their "different set of rules"
> is like with the piece of shit called the Patriot Act.
>
How many Dem congressional leaders voted for the USA Patriot Act?
Bhairitu wrote:
> I here housing is cheap in Russia.
> They'll probably love you there.
>
So, you're saying that you don't like what Dixon said, so Dixon should
go to Russia.
In a message dated 11/29/06 8:27:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 6:22:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
>
> This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about
>
In a message dated 11/29/06 7:14:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent! Well thought out and well said. Notice Newt did not
say "let me"
> make the new rules. He said we should all work together to agree on
new rules
> that we can live with. But then maybe so
In a message dated 11/29/06 7:11:33 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They'd still find ways to do it, but they'd be so
> secretive we wouldn't know what they're up to
> without curtailing even *more* of our freedoms.
>
> So you want to make it easy for them and protect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 6:22:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about
>
>> the first amendment, but I think that the national security threat of
>> losing an America
In a message dated 11/29/06 7:00:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I have to back off this one, on the basis of
a different version of the exchange from The
Washington Post:
"How's your boy?" Bush asked, referring to Webb's son, a Marine
serving in Iraq.
"I'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Excellent! Well thought out and well said. Notice Newt did not
say "let me"
> make the new rules. He said we should all work together to agree on
new rules
> that we can live with. But then maybe some think that losing an
occa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:49:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Driving terrorist underground, unable to communicate openly
> > and glorify their activities would make it harder for them
> >
In a message dated 11/29/06 6:22:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about
> the first amendment, but I think that the national security threat of
> losing an American city to a nuclear weapon, or losing sev
In a message dated 11/29/06 6:33:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
“different set of rules” may be needed to reduce the terrorists’ ability to
> use the Internet to recruit and communicate. "We need to get ahead of the
> curve before we actually lose a city, which I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:21:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> It was thoughtful of Bush to recognize Lance Corporal Webb's
> service towards
> > his father. Of course Webb could have said
In a message dated 11/29/06 6:13:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But we are probably (if not already)
> seeing a problem with ex-military who are mentally disturbed taking jobs
> in law enforcement and being dangerous in such authority
>
>
> "Probably"? Is that th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't thi
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:49:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Driving terrorist underground, unable to communicate openly
> and glorify their activities would make it harder for them
> to recruit new terrorists and preach their message to
> impressionable minds.
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:58:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the section of Gingrich's address that
was about free speech, from his own Web site:
NEWT GINGRICH: …The third thing I want to talk about very briefly is
the genuine danger of terrorism in part
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:30:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The article was short so it won't tax anyone's attention span.
>
>
>
>
> “different set of rules” may be needed to reduce the terrorists’ ability to
> use the Interne
authfriend wrote:
> Here's the section of Gingrich's address that
> was about free speech, from his own Web site:
>
>
> NEWT GINGRICH: …The third thing I want to talk about very briefly is
> the genuine danger of terrorism in particular terrorists using
> weapons of mass destruction and weapons o
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:47:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible
and probably
> counter-
> indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you
at least
> know what they
> are thinkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 4:25:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> But we are probably (if not already)
> seeing a problem with ex-military who are mentally disturbed taking jobs
> in law enforcement and being dangerous in such auth
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:30:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The article was short so it won't tax anyone's attention span.
“different set of rules” may be needed to reduce the terrorists’ ability to
use the Internet to recruit and communicate. "We need to
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:42:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Driving terrorist underground, unable to communicate openly and glorify
> their activities would make it harder for them to recruit new terrorists
and
> preach their message to impressionable minds.
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:21:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was thoughtful of Bush to recognize Lance Corporal Webb's
service towards
> his father. Of course Webb could have said "He's doing fine"
or "he wants
> to come home"
So "I want him to come home
In a message dated 11/29/06 4:25:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But we are probably (if not already)
seeing a problem with ex-military who are mentally disturbed taking jobs
in law enforcement and being dangerous in such authority
"Probably"? Is that the best y
Here's the section of Gingrich's address that
was about free speech, from his own Web site:
NEWT GINGRICH:
The third thing I want to talk about very briefly is
the genuine danger of terrorism in particular terrorists using
weapons of mass destruction and weapons of mass murder, nuclear and
bi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> >> sparaig@ writes:
> >>
> >> Curtailing terrorist website
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:46:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible
and
> probably counter-
> > indicated anyway. As long as they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible
and probably
> counter-
> indicated anyway. As long as they ge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Free speech zones, never heard of that.
That's where protesters are cordoned off in an
area where they can't be seen or heard by the
people they're protesting *to*.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:57 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:48 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >>
> >>> If I follow what you've been saying over the year
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing some of us are trying to do here is *not*
> to convince TMers to "jump ship." What we're trying
> to do is point out that the TM stance of being "the
> best" is considered by the greater spiritual community
> a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:46:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and
> probably counter-
> > indicated anyway. As long as they g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 11/29/06 12:49:07 P.M. Central Standard
Time,
> > jstein@ writes:
> >
> > From "The Hill":
> >
> > ...At a private recept
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > Alright. So you're saying that Vaj, who can't furnish any
> > direct reference to the studies he claims exists, is being
> > more clear than moi, who does fur
authfriend wrote:
> Follow-up on the Great Peace Sign Flap from today's NYTimes:
>
> November 29, 2006
> Pro-Peace Symbol Forces Win Battle in Colorado Town
> By KIRK JOHNSON
>
> DENVER, Nov. 28 — Peace is fighting back in Pagosa Springs.
>
> Last week, a couple were threatened with fines of $25 a
sparaig wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and
>> probably
>> counter-
>> indicat
This meeting between these two;
Appears to be no win for either side.
And both appear terrified to meet with one another
R.g.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:41:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Did you not read that I mentioned the "free speech zones"? That is a
> particularly offensive curbing of free speech!
>
> Did you not read the article? Newt wants to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> > >
> > > There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> > > either blind, stu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 12:49:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> From "The Hill":
>
> ...At a private reception held at the White House with newly
elected
> lawmakers shortly after the elec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:46:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and
> probably counter-
>
>> indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> > either blind, stupid or insane.
>
> Or, you are so much one yourself that you cannot
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:46:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible
and
> probably counter-
> > indicated anyway. As long as they
In a message dated 11/29/06 3:12:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dunno. Haven't read about the issue. Was just pointing out that censorship
of free speech
might be counterproductive, even if it is "terrorist free speech."
I don't know either that's why I asked
On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:57 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:48 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
If I follow what you've been saying over the years, you are simply
saying both the Hindu
tantric meditation systems and the Buddhi
I've had enough of this name calling.
It's sickening. Get the fuck over yourselves.
- Original Message -
From: "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vaj is a fraud
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub
In a message dated 11/29/06 1:41:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you not read that I mentioned the "free speech zones"? That is a
particularly offensive curbing of free speech!
Did you not read the article? Newt wants to curb speech on the
Internet. Now he sa
In a message dated 11/29/06 1:46:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and
probably counter-
> indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you
at least know what they
> are thinking (or a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It doesn't really matter much whether someone is a TB of TM,
or not.
> > If they practice TM and find it effective, why try to get them
to
> > try something else?
>
> NO ONE is trying to get anyone to do something e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
[...]
> > Alright. So you're saying that Vaj, who can't furnish any direct reference
> > to the studies
> he
> > claims exists, is being more clear than moi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:48 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
>
> > If I follow what you've been saying over the years, you are simply
> > saying both the Hindu
> > tantric meditation systems and the Buddhist ones both share
> > tech
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and probably
> counter-
> indicated anyway. As long as they get
In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and probably
counter-
indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you at least
know what they
are thinking (or at le
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> > >
> > > There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> > > either bli
Has anyone here placed a security freeze on thier credit reports to
prevent identity theft? If so, has it worked for you? Has it created
any inconviences such as having to reverse the freeze when purchasing
anything requiring credit reports such as insurance, cell phones,
hospital care, etc.? H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You prefer the way it's been done for less than 50 years, he
prefers the one
> that's been done experientially for thousand and thousands of years.
One is tried and true
> and has produced innumerable enlightned beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> > either blind, stupid or insane.
>
> Or, you are so much one yourself that you cannot
>
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:48 PM, kaladevi93 wrote:
If I follow what you've been saying over the years, you are simply
saying both the Hindu
tantric meditation systems and the Buddhist ones both share
techniques to perfect the
fourth pranayama--a subtle pranayama important for deep meditation
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't thi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> > either blind, stupid or insane.
>
> Or, you are so much one yourself that you cannot
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, then again, if TM was a holistic path not everybody would have left
> it.
Quick. What is Yoga, according to Patanjali? What is Yoga, according to you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2006, at 12:30 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I don't think he say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Well, then again, if TM was a holistic path not everybody would
have left
> it.
>
Rather than assume that people have left TM because it is an
incomplete or flawed path, I think that possibly people mistook
Mahari
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:09 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>> So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Some old re
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
Indeed. And before I became a teacher I read the Shrimad Bhagavatam
(the version sold by Motilal Press) and was advised by the teacher who
loaned it to me to be quiet as the TMO didn't like us reading stuff
like
this. After TTC I also read the S
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 12:30 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> >> of the teaching are very limited
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
> either blind, stupid or insane.
Or, you are so much one yourself that you cannot
see the phenomenon you are an integral part of.
If you honestly, truly b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > > of the teaching a
In a message dated 11/29/06 12:49:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>From "The Hill":
...At a private reception held at the White House with newly elected
lawmakers shortly after the election, Bush asked Webb how his son, a
Marine lance corporal serving in Iraq, was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > > of the teaching
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nablusos108"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Vaj is a fraud.
> > >
> > > He has no knowledge whatsoever about what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 11/28/06 8:54:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > noozguru@ writes:
> >
> > Yes we don't need to reexamine freedom of speech an
November 29, 2006
An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists
By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
A computer in antiquity would seem to be an anachronism, like Athena
ordering takeout on her cellphone.
But a century ago, pieces of a strange mechanism with bronze gears
and dials were recovered from an ancient
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 11:56:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Freedom of speech is not an absolute freedom. You can't yell "fire" in a
>
>> crowded theater and you can't slander people. What specifically has Newt
>> propose
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:09 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
Some old research and more modern research on tummo (inner heat)
meditation which mastery of requires
Indeed. And before I became a teacher I read the Shrimad Bhagavatam
(the version sold by Motilal Press) and was advised by the teacher who
loaned it to me to be quiet as the TMO didn't like us reading stuff like
this. After TTC I also read the Shiva Puranas and some of the Vishnu
Puranas. W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 11/28/06 8:54:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Yes we don't need to reexamine freedom of speech and we need to take
> back what curbs have put on freedom speech. Anyone know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub"
wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > > of the teaching
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub"
wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > > of the teaching
Well, then again, if TM was a holistic path not everybody would have left
it.
- Original Message -
From: "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vaj is a fraud
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > So where is the research on the fourth done by "serious scientists?'
> >
>
> Some old research and more modern research on tummo (inner heat)
> meditation which mastery of requires inner perfection of the fourth
> p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 10:44 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Guffaw. TM researchers have never mentioned 'the fourth pranayama"
> > in any research or
> > discussion that I have heard. Of course, I notice you neatly snipt
> > t
In a message dated 11/29/06 11:56:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Freedom of speech is not an absolute freedom. You can't yell "fire" in a
> crowded theater and you can't slander people. What specifically has Newt
> proposed as far as curbing freedom of speech? Is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> >
> > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > of the teaching are very limited and limiting.
>
> He says it's a fraud because it clai
>From "The Hill":
...At a private reception held at the White House with newly elected
lawmakers shortly after the election, Bush asked Webb how his son, a
Marine lance corporal serving in Iraq, was doing.
Webb responded that he really wanted to see his son brought back
home, said a person who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nablusos108"
> > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
wrote:
> > It is one thing to dive into spiritual knowledge deeply, learning
> > all of the component parts and their relationship to one another.
> > However it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> of the teaching are very limited and limiting.
He says it's a fraud because it claims *not* to be
limited and limiting.
However, he obviously doesn't under
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" wrote:
> >
> > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > of the teaching are very limited and limiting.
>
> I agree with Llundrub here. I think t
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
