--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jun 4, 2009, at 2:59 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >>
&
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Randy Meltzer" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
Hey Vaj,
I forgot to mention in my previous post that I had a meeting with
Shankaracharya Swaroopananda who as you may know is the other
saint (which is the common expression for any of
> these types of people in India) is not justified?
>
>
>
> I think many of us here have some issues with some of the things he has
> done, or the way he ran his organization etc., but still there is
> nothing wrong with show
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
> >>
> &g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> > So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what are
> > you doing on this forum? Do you feel its your job to somehow
> > bri
So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what are you doing on
this forum? Do you feel its your job to somehow bring the light of knowledge
to all us ignorant Tmers?
Why do you waste so much of your time on this...?
And no matter what you think of him, show some respect. He d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>Hey vaj,
Why do you insist on calling Maharishi, Mahesh?
For whatever reason he went by that name (and I have read all the various
stories of whether the name was conferred officially or people just started
calling him that, or whatever the reaso
uch time with his endless claims of insider
> knowledge. Vaj is a hack parading as an american nath-guru and advanced
> dzogchenpa. Mostly he just makes this stuff up.
Hey emptybill, thanks for this
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On
Hey Vaj,
Your take and mine are obviously different on the whole
shankaracharya/vaishnavite thing and it made me wonder what your take on
Gandharva veda is. That is to say, in your opinion, was what MMY was promoting
as Gandharva Veda, actually Gandharva Veda music?
Just wondering what you hav
Hi Rick,
I just returned from Seattle today and Amma happen to be there so I thought I
would go and see her. I have seen her before but not in many years.
My experience with her was the same as every other time I have seen her, which
is, this is also very nice, but frankly I don't see the big
Both ashrams seemed very traditional ashram like. Not at all TM like.
I plan on visiting Kanchipuram in the fall.
>
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Depends on a number of things really Lurk. A big one for me is 'what
> >> d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On May 31, 2009, at 9:26 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
>
> > "Randy Meltzer" wrote:
> >
> >> Any comments Vaj?
> >>
> >
> > I have noticed sometimes at this point the call
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On May 31, 2009, at 9:26 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
>
> > "Randy Meltzer" wrote:
> >
> >> Any comments Vaj?
> >>
> >
> > I have noticed sometimes at this point the call
rhaps you are right and I am wrong. I guess
my 16 trips there taught me nothing.
>
> On May 31, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill"
> > wrote:
> >> Hey empty bill
> >
> > Thanks for
way, as far as Bhaja Govindam is concerned, Govinda was the name
> of Shankara's guru, who was also a direct disciple of the famous advaita
> teacher Gaudapada.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 31, 2009, at 2:08
than Vaj. I am open to someone else
who is knowledgable to comment on this. Vaj thinks he knows something about
this, but I don't believe he does.
>
> On May 31, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>Vaj,
What makes you think that the shankaracharya tradition is a "vaishnavite" group?
The shankaracharya order has always been a shiva tradition, not a Vishnu
tradition (vaishnavites are vishnu/krishna followers).
Its obvious even from the name.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>Hey Vaj,
I would like to respond to your comment in this post about the "bought"
shankaracharyas. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I am assumming that you
mean that the Shantinand-VishnuDevand-Vasudevananda line has been somehow
manipulate
I have heard in a variety of places including this forum that Maharishi could
not enter the US and India after a certan point because if he did he would have
been served with legal papers.
Does anyone know the details of these cases and why he would have been served?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> >> What post or posts are you referring to Randy?
> >
> > I am referring to any and all posts where you seem to indicate
that
> > TM has no valid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote:
>
> > As a reader of this forum, I notice that Vaj is a frequent
> > contributor.
> > So Vaj, what are you trying to accomplish?
> > Fine you don
As a reader of this forum, I notice that Vaj is a frequent contributor.
So Vaj, what are you trying to accomplish?
Fine you don't like TM, Maharishi or the TM movement.
WE GET IT! Do you have to keep trying to prove your point over and
over ad naseum?
Don't you realize that those of us who are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> I recognize Charlie and Maharishi. I'm guessing the woman on the left
> is Charlie's wife. Who is the Indian woman?
>
Everyone called her Mataji. She
23 matches
Mail list logo
