by Patrick Devonas, Switzerland:
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/10743.jpg
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/10743.jpg
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/10743.jpg
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/10743.jpg
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/10743.jpg
I like Howard Stern's criteria for a good movie:
1) It must have a lesbian love scene
2) It must have a kung-fu fight.
Now, what movie is better than that, hmmm?
--- Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, it is a "chick flick." Kind of like those
> Merchant-Ivory films set
> in the early 20
Yup, it is a "chick flick." Kind of like those Merchant-Ivory films set
in the early 20th century and yes it is supposed to take place right
before and at the start of WWII but sure didn't feel that way. It is a
masterfully done film though but I wouldn't rate it as high as Turq. In
fact on "
Bhairitu wrote:
> TurquoiseB wrote:
>
>> I don't know why, but from the moment I heard about
>> this film I had expectations of it running through
>> my head. Somehow, and for some unknown reason, I
>> expected it to be one of those upper-class Brit
>> morality plays full of upper-class twit-Br
TurquoiseB wrote:
> I don't know why, but from the moment I heard about
> this film I had expectations of it running through
> my head. Somehow, and for some unknown reason, I
> expected it to be one of those upper-class Brit
> morality plays full of upper-class twit-Brits and
> repressed sexualit
I don't know why, but from the moment I heard about
this film I had expectations of it running through
my head. Somehow, and for some unknown reason, I
expected it to be one of those upper-class Brit
morality plays full of upper-class twit-Brits and
repressed sexuality and emotion. People talked a
