That is good but too long now to be a bumpersticker:
"Knowledge is Structured in Consciousness - For TM'ers the basis of existence
is intelligence and the perceptions are immaterial."
On 2/7/2014 1:50 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
I would say it's typical superstitious thinking.punditste
On 2/7/2014 1:50 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
I would say it's typical superstitious thinking.
>
In Hindu Advaita and Yogacara Buddhism you have an idealism which
asserts that reality, or reality as we can know it, is fundamentally
mental, mentally constructed, knowledge structured in consciousness
Comment below
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
On 2/6/2014 10:09 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
It's wrong to assume that intelligent things must have had an intelligent
creator. >
We do not assume anything but we infer based on the valid means of knowledge:
Objects that enter ou
On 2/6/2014 10:09 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
It's wrong to assume that intelligent things must have had an
intelligent creator.
>
We do not assume anything but we infer based on the valid means of
knowledge: Objects that enter our consciousness experience seem already
made. Some unconscious or su
Comments below
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
style="font-size:13px;font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial,
san-serif, Roboto;">The idea that there is a vast intelligence behind nature is
ridiculous.
>
On 2/6/2014 10:09 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Quite easy actua
> *The idea that there is a vast intelligence behind nature is ridiculous.
>
*On 2/6/2014 10:09 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Quite easy actually. Kant lived long before quantum physics and our
current understanding of cosmology and evolution.
>
The last resort of the naive realist is an appeal to ins
ng it?
On Thu, 2/6/14, salyavin808 wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Transcendental Unified Field Tolstoy
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014, 4:16 PM
LOL, good c
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
LOL, good choice of pictures. I like the one of me particularly.
Hee, hee, good one. See, a sense of humour must require a God and your ability
to explain all about the nebula requires an a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I'll add something else to that. I'm into astronomy and can spend all night
staring at distant galaxies through my telescope and wondering whether there is
life out there. Nature is awesome and I have a deep sense of wonder about it's
myster
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
LOL, good choice of pictures. I like the one of me particularly.
Hee, hee, good one. See, a sense of humour must require a God and your ability
to explain all about the nebula requires an amazing activity of synapsis and
chemicals and energy
I'll add something else to that. I'm into astronomy and can spend all night
staring at distant galaxies through my telescope and wondering whether there is
life out there. Nature is awesome and I have a deep sense of wonder about it's
mysteries and functions. The more you know about life, the
LOL, good choice of pictures. I like the one of me particularly.
But really, there's nothing here that had a designer. The nebula is beautiful
but it's just a cloud of gas lit from inside by the stars within. It's actually
visible to the naked eye in the constellation of Orion. Quite amazing
Comments below
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
On 2/6/2014 7:13 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
The idea that there is a vast intelligence behind nature is ridiculous. >
You are going to have to put a lot of effort into refuting the philosophers
like Kant and Shankara. There is ev
On 2/6/2014 7:13 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
*The idea that there is a vast intelligence behind nature is ridiculous.*
>
You are going to have to put a lot of effort into refuting the
philosophers like Kant and Shankara. There is every reason to believe,
based on logic that the physical universe ca
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
"“Help comes only from the Unified Field,” - Do you have any idea how creepy
this sounds? I hope there aren't any genuine scholars reading this, they'd be
edging towards the door by now...
When you say unified field you mean god. Why not jus
"“Help comes only from the Unified Field,” - Do you have any idea how creepy
this sounds? I hope there aren't any genuine scholars reading this, they'd be
edging towards the door by now...
When you say unified field you mean god. Why not just admit it? The idea that
there is a vast intellige
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote [with
corrections applied]:
After these words the Mason leaned on his elbow on the back of the sofa and
closed his eyes, as though weary of prolonged talking. Pierre gazed at that
stern, immovable, old, almost death-like face, and moved his lips wi
After these words the transcendentalist leaned on his elbow on the back of the
sofa and closed his eyes, as though weary of prolonged talking. Pierre gazed at
that stern, immovable, old, almost death-like face, and moved his lips without
uttering a sound. He wanted to say, “Yes, a vile, idle, vi
“Where you going now, sir?”
..answered Pierre in a tone of childish indecision, “I thank you. I agree with
you in everything. But do not suppose that I have been so bad. With all my soul
I have desired to be what you would wish me to be; But I have never met with
help from any one . . . Though
The transcendentalist was silent, obviously pondering something.
“Help comes only from the Unified Field,” he said, “but such measure of aid as
it is in the power of our movement to give you, it will give you, sir. You go
to this lecture and give them this” (he took out of his notebook and wro
Unified Field Tolstoy:
Tolstoy's War and Peace, Book V: 1806 - 07
Paraphrased
Transcendental Tolstoy.
Dear Feste,
It gets better or worst. Forgive me if I sin as doing more in this paraphrase:
>Feste37> wrote:
>Oh, Buck, "Paraphrasing" the Bible is OK, but doing the same
“I don't understand,” said Pierre the non-meditator, feeling with dismay that
doubt was stirring within him. The non-meditator dreaded obscurity and
feebleness in the transcendentalist's argument, he dreaded being unable to
believe in him. “I don't understand,” he said, “in what way human reason
the misspelling here, despite appearances, is not mine but Buck's, although no
doubt no one cares.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Transcendental Tolstoy.
Dear Feste,
It gets better or worst. Forgive me if I sin as doing more in this paraphrase:
>Feste37> wrote:
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
