--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, excellent point, and excellent dis
Yeah, I agree with Sal. My words have as much varacity
as beetle dung (must have just channeled that). Who
cares what I say. Sorry I come across that way.
-Peter
--- Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with that--the Ouija board or Magic 8 balls
> are much more
> reliable.
>
> Sal
No, that would be Michael Jackson.
Sal
On Jun 29, 2005, at 10:15 AM, anonymousff wrote:
To me your name is as anonymous as any other. I don't know you. Its
just a name. If you were signing off as "Peter Pan", it would all be
the same to me.
I agree with that--the Ouija board or Magic 8 balls are much more reliable.
Sal
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:24 AM, anonymousff wrote:
To me, and my reaction may be tied to Peter's past style and tone, not
just his words, I felt Peter's comment was twisting Jerry's comment,
"I think it sums up the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dr. Pete isn't enlightened. How could he be
> enlightened? He can't be enlightened. Rory isn't
> enlightened, Anon isn't enlightened, Lups isn't
> enlightend. Maharishi isn't enlightened. Spraig isn't
> enlightened. R
--- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > (to the possibly discriminatively-challenged,
> there is a difference
> > between wit (both attempted or successful), used
> to make a point,
>
> Yes, I must
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> Sutphen
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On the
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On the old TM list, Jonothan Levy used to talk
> > > about how the mind works in ever-widening
> circles
>
--- lupidus108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My personal opinion is
> > that it is foolish to channel. That's all.
> >
> You are doing well Peter; your next challenge will
> be to be able to
> distinguish between "channeling" and
> "overshadowing". Good luck :-)
Thank you Master. Some day I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the old TM list, Jonothan Levy used to talk
> > about how the mind works in ever-widening circles
> > to maintain its dominance. It figures out that it
> > is in
On Jun 29, 2005, at 2:07 PM, lupidus108 wrote:
> You are doing well Peter; your next challenge will be to be able to
> distinguish between "channeling" and "overshadowing".
Overshadowing: when the shadow of darkness comes upon you and you make
up prophecies for the gullible, naive and desperat
My personal opinion is
> that it is foolish to channel. That's all.
>
You are doing well Peter; your next challenge will be to be able to
distinguish between "channeling" and "overshadowing". Good luck :-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I'm would not have thought Brahman would be so petty. oh well.
> > sigh.
>
> Why persist in trying to limit or describe Brahman? Br
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I'm would not have thought Brahman would be so petty. oh well.
> sigh.
Why persist in trying to limit or describe Brahman? Brahman is all
three gunas, and every combination thereof, and none of the above.
Brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[...]
> > (sound of mind popping here)...
>
> Brahman is not the sound of mind popping.
> Brahman is not the sound of mind not popping.
> Brahman is not the soun
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You could say Brahman encompasses *all* POVs, I
> > > > guess. But not only would that flummox your
> > > > point, you would get into the Four Negations, in
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> (to the possibly discriminatively-challenged, there is a difference
> between wit (both attempted or successful), used to make a point,
Yes, I must be discriminatively challenged, because the only point I
see her
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I canNOT believe you can be this big of an idiot.
So it must be ME! *ROFL*
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
<[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > ( Some on
> > > this list used to channel. W
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> Sutphen
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > ( Some on
> > > this list used to channel. Who
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> > > be said to have a P
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So, in response to your original question, I don't
> > > think all c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <
[...]
>
> Peace reigns a last! The lion lays down with the lamb.
> We actually have very similar takes on channeling.
My favorite channeler is Boopsie from Doonesbury, who channels Hunkra,
the 20,000 year old atlantean warrior.
well she used
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, in response to your original question, I don't
> > think all channelers are stupid. My opinion based
> on
> > my own short experience with channeling (Teaching
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > What's interesting (to me, anyway) is that the
> > > mind is perfectly capable of recognizing the
> > > logic that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> ( Some on
> > this list used to channel. Who knows what influence still lurks
> within
> > them? But I digress.)
>
> The Shadow kno
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
( Some on
> this list used to channel. Who knows what influence still lurks
within
> them? But I digress.)
The Shadow knowsmwahahaha
(In this instance, the Shadow feels it is unsafe to express anger or
hostili
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What's interesting (to me, anyway) is that the
> > mind is perfectly capable of recognizing the
> > logic that puts Brahman beyond its capacity
> > to recognize, but cann
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > What's interesting (to me, anyway) is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > What's interesting (to me, anyway) is that the
> > mind is perfectly capable of recognizing the
> > logic that puts Brahman beyond it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, in response to your original question, I don't
> think all channelers are stupid. My opinion based on
> my own short experience with channeling (Teachings of
> the Inner Christ a la Susan Chumsky) is that it is
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> > be said to have a POV? Having a POV implies
> > the existence of a *different* PO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, in response to your original question, I don't
> think all channelers are stupid. My opinion based on
> my own short experience with channeling (Teachings of
> the Inner Christ a la Susan Chumsky) is that it is
>
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> > > be said to have a POV? Having a POV implies
> > > the existen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's interesting (to me, anyway) is that the
> mind is perfectly capable of recognizing the
> logic that puts Brahman beyond its capacity
> to recognize, but cannot, of its own accord,
> take it the next step and shu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
Anon, we got off on the wrong foot (!!!) with the
channeling stuff. Your post here clarifies things to
me. First, I didn't know you were being humorous in
your response regarding Jerry's comment. It was a
humorous jump in logic not an illogical jump and/or
projection on your part. For me the commen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> > be said to have a POV? Having a POV implies
> > the existence of a *different* POV, which would
> > in turn imply some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> > be said to have a POV? Having a POV implies
> > the existence of a *different* POV,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Brahman is One without a second, how can it
> be said to have a POV? Having a POV implies
> the existence of a *different* POV, which would
> in turn imply something other than Brahman ("a
> second") to hold that d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, anonymousff wrote:
> >
> > > To me, and my reaction may be tied to Peter's past style and
tone, not
> > > jus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Anon, I think a more accurate description would just
> be an aggressive response in reaction to your post
> rather than a passive-aggressive psychologist. My
> response to you had nothing to do with me being a
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory
> Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, anonymousff wrote:
>
> > To me, and my reaction may be tied to Peter's past style and tone, not
> > just his words, I felt Peter's comment was twisting Jerry's comment,
> > "I think it sums up t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hm? How so, given Brahman's tendency to collapse Wholeness into
> Point(s), hence POV ...? (Though technically this might be "Krishna"
> rather than "Brahman," I suppose.) It sounds more as if you are
> describing
On Jun 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, anonymousff wrote:
> To me, and my reaction may be tied to Peter's past style and tone, not
> just his words, I felt Peter's comment was twisting Jerry's comment,
> "I think it sums up the whole thing, doesn't". My take on his comment
> was that 'well that settles it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I recall being told that MMY had once be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems this is all is just a lot senseless griping. All Dr. Pete said
> was
>
> "And of course the classic Jerry Jarvis line on
> channeling,"Just because you're dead doesn't make you
> smart!" I think it sums up the whole t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > I recall being told that MMY had once been asked
> > why the Absolute had manifested, and he responded,
> > "Perhaps for the sake o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recall being told that MMY had once been asked
> why the Absolute had manifested, and he responded,
> "Perhaps for the sake of variety?"
>
> On another occasion he was asked the same question.
> His answer: "It di
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, excellent point, and excellent discrimination. This reminds
me
> > that boredom is probably (always?) symptomatic of lack o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Yes, excellent point, and excellent discrimination. This reminds me
> that boredom is probably (always?) symptomatic of lack of
> discrimination somewhere in one's attention-field :-) Thanks.
Which reminds me of U
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems this is all is just a lot senseless griping. All Dr. Pete
said
> was
>
> "And of course the classic Jerry Jarvis line on
> channeling,"Just because you're dead doesn't make you
> smart!" I think it sums up the whole
It seems this is all is just a lot senseless griping. All Dr. Pete said
was
"And of course the classic Jerry Jarvis line on
channeling,"Just because you're dead doesn't make you
smart!" I think it sums up the whole thing, doesn't
it?"
Which did not appear to imply in any way that 'disincarnates
--- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > No, of course not. I consider them all to
> > passive-aggressive assholes like you.
>
> Excellent (and well-deserved) repartee, Dr. Pete. I
> bow and hand my
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought it was the blind leading the blind.
> >
> > *yawn*
>
> An n
--- Jeff Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Its odd that you turn a question into "your
> > > conclusion." Internal
> > > biases? I hope you are more objective with your
> > > patients.
> >
> > No, of course not. I consider them all to
> > passive-aggressive assholes like you.
>
> Anothe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
<[
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > An new state of consciousness? All is sleepy?
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Bored in Brahman, an intersting concept.
*LOL* Now THAT is FUNNY! Thanks for the tickle.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join
> > Its odd that you turn a question into "your
> > conclusion." Internal
> > biases? I hope you are more objective with your
> > patients.
>
> No, of course not. I consider them all to
> passive-aggressive assholes like you.
Another potential bullbaiting duo emerges!
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > An new state of consciousness? All is sleepy?
>
> No; your anonymous persona bores me, obviously.
Bored in Brahman, an intersting co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> An new state of consciousness? All is sleepy?
No; your anonymous persona bores me, obviously.
> Actually, I thought it germaine. A passive aggressive anger-flaming
> psychologist trying to cure patients of such and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I thought it was the blind leading the blind.
>
> *yawn*
An new state of consciousness? All is sleepy?
Actually, I thought it ge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I thought it was the blind leading the blind.
*yawn*
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > No, of course not. I consider them all to
> > passive-aggressive assholes like you.
>
> Excellent (and well-deserved) reparte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We just have a different take on this. No big deal.
> I'm sure a fruitful discussion could ensue. Jerry's
> comment has to do more with many people's uncritical
> acceptance of channeled material as being the gospe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, of course not. I consider them all to
> passive-aggressive assholes like you.
Excellent (and well-deserved) repartee, Dr. Pete. I bow and hand my
One-Upsmanship crown to the better man :-)
To subscribe,
--- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > And of course the classic Jerry Jarvis line on
> > channeling,"Just because you're dead doesn't make
> you
> > smart!" I think it sums up the whole thing,
> doesn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And of course the classic Jerry Jarvis line on
> channeling,"Just because you're dead doesn't make you
> smart!" I think it sums up the whole thing, doesn't
> it?
Yes. A sense of fairness compels me to add, howeve
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> Sutphen
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> Sutphen
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > Oh, yeah, didn't you know? St. Germain is a
> > channelled Ascended
> > Master.
What does it mean to be ascended ?
A master for sure, but according to my information St. Germain is now
in incarnation.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ---
--- anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> Sutphen
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > St. Germ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > St. Germain? I didn't know he was so interested in
> > > 9/11. Saints are
--- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > St. Germain? I didn't know he was so interested in
> > 9/11. Saints are so curious with or without
> bodies.
>
> Oh, yeah, didn't you know? St. Germain is a
> channel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> St. Germain? I didn't know he was so interested in
> 9/11. Saints are so curious with or without bodies.
Oh, yeah, didn't you know? St. Germain is a channelled Ascended
Master. That gives him the ability to assume t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> St. Germain? I didn't know he was so interested in
> 9/11. Saints are so curious with or without bodies.
Dude gets around. Over here he's the leader of
a fairly happening techno/synth/jazz musical group:
http://www
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Subject: FW: [NESARA CANADA] St Germain - The Truth will out, 25th
June 2005- The tide of evidence against the perpetrators of 9/11 is
gathering
> momentum, and no amount of threats against those that hold
> compel
86 matches
Mail list logo
