I think Religion is a bi-product of spirituality, as opposed to sprituality
being a bi-product of religion.
First you have spirituality. Someone achieves great spiritual development and
achieves a great deal of admiration. So a bunch of people follow that person,
record his thoughts and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@...
wrote:
I think Religion is a bi-product of spirituality, as opposed to sprituality
being a bi-product of religion.
It is very difficult to gain *proficiency* in Religion without spirituality,
this is true, that is
And how does that person 'achieve' great spiritual development?, through a
Religion developed by someone who achieved great spiritual development, and
on and on it goes, religion leads to spirituality which is the substance of
religion. FWIW. :-)
Not necessarily. Eckhart Tolle, from what
Additionally, the suggestion that one is 'spiritual' and not Religious,
generally means one does not follow any 'sectarian' Religion, but some take it
a step further and suggest that Religion itself doesn't even lead to
spirituality which is ridiculous.
Life itself leads to spirituality, true
(Generally, you don't BECOME spiritual without
practicing some form of Religion, today, most
people who claim to be 'spiritual' (as opposed
to Religious) *ARE* practicing some from of
discipline i.e. RELIGION).
Bhairitu:
Religion is for sheeple...
Religion is for the 99%;
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The misery in the
world is because we throw away the banana and are holding on to the skin.
I had not really thought about this. I found an article on about.com
(http://atheism.about.com/od/religionnonreligion/a/spirituality.htm) that
discusses this point - it implies this distinction between spirituality and
religion is mainly an American (US) phenomenon.
My question here is, if an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@... wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana.
The misery in the world is because we throw away the banana
and are holding on to the skin.
Hear hear. Either that or religion is the
Dude, is that coffee shop a little smokey this morning?
Are you saying that religious people are usually dicks?
Hear hear. Either that or religion is the condom and
spirituality is the dick.
Religions that involve a lot of costumes and dress-up
are like French ticklers.
:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
I had not really thought about this. I found an article on about.com
(http://atheism.about.com/od/religionnonreligion/a/spirituality.htm) that
discusses this point - it implies this distinction between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@... wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The
misery in the world is because we throw away the banana and are
holding on to the skin.
Or, fixating on the finger pointing at the
I think what Turq is trying to say is that ALL of life itself, is Religion,
either it is poorly practiced Religion or Wisely practiced Religion.
Because life itself is a form of school and learning (through the experience of
opposites) whose purpose is to bring all human Beings to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@ wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana.
The misery in the world is because we throw away the banana
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@ wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The
misery in the world is because we throw away
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u anitaoaks4u@... wrote:
I think what Turq is trying to say is that ALL of life
itself, is Religion, either it is poorly practiced Religion
or Wisely practiced Religion.
Au contraire, Pierre. What Turq is trying to say is
that in his opinion religion
'wgm4u' I am quoting from two different posts here (Turq Xeno). I think you
are missing something here. I cannot really speak for Turq, but to take a shot,
what he says is often a lot less than what he has been assumed to have said,
that is, you have over-interpreted whatever his intent might
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
'wgm4u' I am quoting from two different posts here (Turq Xeno). I think you
are missing something here. I cannot really speak for Turq, but to take a
shot, what he says is often a lot less than what he
Fair enough. Regards Krishnamurti and Tolle. I think Krishnamurti's style of
communicating his experience to others was largely confusing, though now I get
what he was saying much better than in years past. Tolle does fare better, and
is rather charming to listen to, so you get a sense of what
Q: Dear Guruji, I have never been a spiritual or a true religious person. How
can I learn to let go and believe?
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar: You don't have to label yourself- I am spiritual,
religious person etc. No need for it. Just be natural, beautiful, good human
being. That's it!
If someone is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
pirituality once and for all.
Is it possible to have a spiritual experience without
the presence of and outside of the confines of a
religion? Of course it is. Many of the founders of
what later became religions did
20 matches
Mail list logo
