I think, Papua New-Guinea has a similar arrangement with Australia.??peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:58:26 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dalai Lama Speaks on Dealing with Terrorism[Shemp] Suzerain 1. A nation that controls another nat
I only wrote, what had happened. There is a subtle difference
between the two words.
>
>
> jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:42:30 -0000
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dalai Lama Speaks on Dealing with
Terrorism[Shemp]
>
>
>
I only wrote, what had happened. There is a subtle difference between the two words. jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:42:30 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dalai Lama Speaks on Dealing with Terrorism[Shemp] "Suzerainty&quo
sparaig wrote:
> Ah, so you're using his religious status as a reason to
> criticize him for his secular actions, even though you
> apparently don't believe that his religious status is valid...
>
The Dalai Lama is the secular head of the Tibetan Government - the
Pachen Lama is the head of the re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Have you heard of the great Indian Goof-Up, prior to the
> Chinese invasion of Tibet.?
> >
> > There was a lot of Speculati
e.
He made a public announcement that, "India recognises China's
Sovereignty over Tibet.!"
>
> The next day China marched into Tibet.
I don't get it...what's "suzerainity"?
>
>
> ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
na marched into Tibet. ShempMcGurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 22:17:57 -0000Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dalai Lama Speaks on Dealing with Terrorism[Shemp] I don't mean to "blame the victim" but the Dalai Lama, I believe, is contributorily negligen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 4/3/06 4:17 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 4/3/06 4:17 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 4/3/06 4:17 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Would you please elaborate on this ShempMcGurk.??
> >
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 4/3/06 4:17 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Would you please elaborate on this ShempMcGurk.??
> >
> >
> >
on 4/3/06 4:17 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Would you please elaborate on this ShempMcGurk.??
>
>
>
> I don't mean to "blame the victim" but the Dalai Lama, I believe, is
> contribu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Would you please elaborate on this ShempMcGurk.??
I don't mean to "blame the victim" but the Dalai Lama, I believe, is
contributorily negligent in the holocaust that befell his people
because:
1) had h
Would you please elaborate on this ShempMcGurk.?? Five years of Indo-Chinese friendship ended when Dalai Lama came to India. China wanted Dalai Lama back, but India refused. The 1962 war, in the words of the Chinese Leadership, was "To Teach India a Lesson." In
14 matches
Mail list logo