The source of the Sanskrit language is fascinating; The ancient seers
correlated the vibrations (bija) of the cerebral forces (Sahasrara Chakra
7th)with their respective centers (chakras) in the spine. From the seed sounds
emitted by the action of these vibrations, the rishis evolved the
.
From: cardemais...@yahoo.com cardemais...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 5:29 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
Perhaps more reveiling than the number of consonants is the alphabetical
order
: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
FWIW, because us humans seem to be programmed to look for patterns, we are
worse at forecasting
than e.g. rats:
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/forecasting-is-for-the-birds-and-rats/
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com
Card, sounds like you're saying that because it has more consonants, Sanskrit
is maybe more analytical. I'll add: maybe more left brain dominant? though that
doesn't sound right about Sanskrit. Are you saying that Hebrew is more right
brain, more spatial, softer because of having less
Card, I sure hope you know about this project:
http://www.meru.org/
I met the guy, Stan Tenen, and he's convincing.
He says that the projected 2D shadow of the ram's horn (the shofar) can become
shaped like the Hebrew letters if you twist it this way and that, AND get this,
he told me
