--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@
wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably
miss some of the subtlties, but it seems that the tone of
today's posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
snip
I'll bet she'll come out with at least one really,
really nasty put down against
Sal and John debate? Ditto one and ditto two? Surely you jest. At best it takes
the two of them just to deliver a one liner. Sounds like Judy. Sure does.
Geez, they have the intellectual depth of a puddle. Worse yet, they are totally
clueless that Shemp's political ideology is much closer to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@...
wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably
miss some of the subtlties, but it seems that the tone of
today's posts are in great contrast to the previous days'
posts where the feuding was
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably
miss some of the subtlties, but it seems that the tone of today's
posts are in great contrast to the previous days' posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
Sal and John debate? Ditto one and ditto two? Surely you jest. At best it
takes the two of them just to deliver a one liner. Sounds like Judy. Sure
does. Geez, they have the intellectual depth of a puddle. Worse yet,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably miss some of
the subtlties, but it seems that the tone of today's posts are in great
Really dumb.
Do:
This statement in particular indeed DOES
characterize Judy's...
So, you're still holding a grudge.
Sounds like Sal and John hold a
grudge against Judy...
Sal:
I agree, lurk. Knowing Judy is out until
Friday, though, I just couldn't resist...
So, it's just another Judy set-up.
lurk:
...it sure is nice to shift into a little more
friendly zone.
You mean, it's nice to be able to attack Judy
because she won't be able to reply until Friday?
Why are almost all of your messages about Judy?
Do:
Maybe we should take bets on how many
posts she'll predictably burn in response.
So, it's still all about Judy.
Turq:
Isn't it fascinating, too, how quickly others
rush to fill the void and try to provoke
feuding of one sort or another?
So, you're feeling lonely because Judy won't
be able to post until Friday.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Sal and John debate? Ditto one and ditto two? Surely you jest. At best it
takes the two of them just to deliver a one liner. Sounds like Judy.
On Feb 4, 2010, at 8:07 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably miss some of
the subtlties, but it seems that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Sal and John debate? Ditto one and ditto two? Surely you jest. At best
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 8:07 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I usually have to burn through the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 8:07 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 8:07 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In
It's come to a point that it's entertaining
to watch her predictably spew as if on command.
RD:
It's official. Counting Judy's post is the refuge
of the hit and runners of FFLife, Sal and do.rk.
Pants on the ground, they're so dumb they think
counting Judy's post substitutes for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:41 AM, do.rflex wrote:
Her secretary, Barbara Weiss, said: I came to look on her as a killer of
people. The workings of her cult exposed the hollowness of Rand's claims
to venerate free
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:41 AM, do.rflex wrote:
Her secretary, Barbara Weiss, said: I came to look on her as a killer of
people. The workings
Sounds like Judy.
Sure does...
Shemp:
Doesn't sound like Judy at all...
Sounds like Sal and John hold a
grudge against Judy for whipping
them in a fair debate. LoL!
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably miss some of the
subtlties, but it seems that the tone of today's posts are in great contrast to
the previous days' posts where the feuding was hot and heavy. I have a more
neutral attitude towards Judy, but damn, it sure is nice to
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I usually have to burn through the posts, and thus I probably miss some of
the subtlties, but it seems that the tone of today's posts are in great
contrast to the previous days' posts where the feuding was hot and heavy. I
have a
24 matches
Mail list logo
