Religion..
Searching the FFL archive for, 'Federal District Court'..
turns up these link:
Here are links to a five-part post made to alt.m.t
in 1996 containing the text of the appeals court
decision and Judge Adams's concurrence;
1 of 5
Upfronter; Nice post. Brave words to write and post.
I would doubt that you are alone in this feeling. Ollie raised the similar
observation too about larger spiritual experience or the lack there of within
the Tony Nader thread here relative to some of the Anti-TM’ing on the internet.
I read a lot of the TM-free site last year and I can understand why some people
feel the way they do in regard to MMY and his latter years’ emphasis upon it
being essential to have such things as the correct architecture for “a man to
be right” when originally all that was needed was the do the
A steering wheel isn't a car either, (but an instrumental part of a car) it's
disingenuous to suggest TM is not Religious when it comes from the Sanatana
Dharma or eternal Religion of the Vedas. TM should be classified as a Religious
Science, clearly it's not JUST a scientific technique. Zeus
Have you run this by Jamesalan yet?
I believe he is our self appointed compliance officer.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Well yes, there is a 'faith' aspect for some inside of TM that may be
different from those just practicing the meditation. Is that
'Ultimate ideas', 'Comprehensive', 'Structure'.
Religion..
Searching the FFL archive for, 'Federal District Court'..
turns up these link:
Here are links to a five-part post made to alt.m.t
in 1996 containing the text of the appeals court
decision and Judge Adams's concurrence;
1 of
