Quite a recollection, Rick. Thanks for sourcing this.
I have a few questions at the bottom.
Rick Archer posted Shannon Dickson's words:
My feeling on seeing how things devolved from
1972 through 1975 is that MMY had gone through
a kind of mini-breakdown, possibly from the
combination of
on 5/2/05 8:28 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the trouble around Shantinand in India?
The Shankaracharya controversy. The conflict between the guy M supported and
the other guy whom the other Shankaracharyas supported.
Who are the TB's? I would say true believers,
He's
thinking of writing a book. David Fiske offers some interestingperspectives,
having been around for most of the 60's.---If you can get past the preachy self righteous
priggishness.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
Patrick Gillam wrote:
It would be vastly entertaining for me to read a lucid
account of how the period before the mid-1970's differed
from the period after. Shannon talks about it a little, but
I'd welcome some elaboration.
Rick Archer wrote:
[Shannon is] thinking of writing a
on 5/2/05 11:33 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because so many people end the golden era at different times, I once tended to
view
the disaffections as having more to do with the people than the movement. Now
I'm
inclined to see those people as having different degrees of
On May 2, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I think it's a matter of relative experience. Most of us didn't get
into it
until after the Beatles. So it seemed great to us, but we had nothing
to
compare it with, as did those who started in the early 60's. Those who
came
in with the
Thankyou, thankyou, Shannon (and Rick) for posting this. I think that
this information is very important - much more important than a lot of
gold print. Somehow it removes some subtle conflict, and lightens my
heart.
Thanks again,
JohnY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
