--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> "Natural and moral philosophy, on the contrary, can each have their empirical
> part, since the former has to determine the laws of nature as an object of
> experience; the latter the laws of the human will, so far as it is affected
> by
"Natural and moral philosophy, on the contrary, can each have their empirical
part, since the former has to determine the laws of nature as an object of
experience; the latter the laws of the human will, so far as it is affected by
nature: the former, however, being laws according to which every
t lends support to my theory that the complete reality of a person
can't possibly come through online.
From: laughinggull108
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:10 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Moral Compass
>
Yes thanks, I am interested in what you say. I have been asked by some of the
folks highest in TM to apply to become TM re-certified. I was wondering how
other re-certs reconcile the moral compass problem for themselves going
forward. It is like the elephant in the room that people inside wi
I honor laughinggull for choosing a path and sticking to it, when so many
others fall away and spend their lives complaining. Those who stay the course
win the prize.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Dear Laughinggull108,
> > > Re-certified? This is in
Doug, why don't you give it a rest? You have your own agenda, and not for a
moment do I think that you really want to understand anyone's thinking. Your
posting history confirms this.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> Any other re-certs here? How did you rationalize gettin
> > Dear Laughinggull108,
> > Re-certified? This is interesting. You have to be one of the few and only
> > re-certified TM teachers willing to post here. This makes you more of an
> > activist. I'll mark you down as "Revolutionary Millenarian" on the FFL
> > member poster's list along wit
