I wouldn't trust the Sears salespeople to know what they are talking
about. OTOH if 3D "capability" is cheap to add then newer sets may come
with it. I even saw a sub $100 Bluray player on sale that was 3D
capable. They are pushing 3D as a new cash cow and it isn't working.
On 02/06/2011 10:
What makes this more interesting is that our brains have always had to convert
an inverted image:
http://www.ehow.com/about_6588437_eye-sees-upside-down.html
I don't like 3D, either. Gives me headaches. I was at a Sony outlet store
yesterday and bought a 2D TV. They were pushing 3D and say
On 01/25/2011 04:16 PM, Tom Pall wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Anyway here is the blog that reported it based on the January 7th
>> employment report. Remember "full time jobs" are the operative words.
>> There are a lot of people out there making ends meet by wor
On 01/26/2011 09:28 AM, authfriend wrote:
> Bhairitu, Slate.com has a series of columns on 3D by a
> guy named Daniel Engber, the most recent of which is a
> rebuttal to Ebert, including Ebert's post with the letter
> from Murch.
>
> Among other points, he says the more 3D movies he watches,
> the
Bhairitu, Slate.com has a series of columns on 3D by a
guy named Daniel Engber, the most recent of which is a
rebuttal to Ebert, including Ebert's post with the letter
from Murch.
Among other points, he says the more 3D movies he watches,
the fewer problems he has watching them. He speculates
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 01/25/2011 01:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> I read a report yesterday that only 47% of working age US
> >> workers have full time jobs!
> >
> > Somebody's playing with the s
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Anyway here is the blog that reported it based on the January 7th
> employment report. Remember "full time jobs" are the operative words.
> There are a lot of people out there making ends meet by working two or
> three part time jobs.
>
>
> http
And overhyped to the extent like it was our "national duty" to go see
it. Looked just like any other video game to movie using 3D to me.
Better use of similar technology and non 3D was the much less costly
sleeper "District 9" which did not look like a video game.
On 01/25/2011 01:46 PM, whyn
On 01/25/2011 01:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> I read a report yesterday that only 47% of working age US
>> workers have full time jobs!
> Somebody's playing with the statistics. Do you have a cite
> of the report?
>
> They're likely countin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> I read a report yesterday that only 47% of working age US
> workers have full time jobs!
Somebody's playing with the statistics. Do you have a cite
of the report?
They're likely counting folks who shouldn't be counted, such
as college stud
Yeah, I'll be the second heretic - I didn't care for Avatar much - a few
amazing special effects, unimaginative story and just...too...long. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:09 PM, whynotnow7 wrote:
>
> > saw one of the large 3D home sets
On 01/25/2011 12:12 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:09 PM, whynotnow7 wrote:
>
>> saw one of the large 3D home sets at Costco and once I put on the glasses,
>> the 3D effect was so minimal it was not worth it. Also the two images would
>> get ever so slightly out of sync. A very
On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:09 PM, whynotnow7 wrote:
> saw one of the large 3D home sets at Costco and once I put on the glasses,
> the 3D effect was so minimal it was not worth it. Also the two images would
> get ever so slightly out of sync. A very expensive gimmick. Very 3D one dot
> ohh. :-)
In
I can produce 3D videos to post on YouTube with the software I have. My
editing software (which cost me all of $20 on sale) can even create 3D
from some 2D videos. They are even selling cheap 3D HD camcorders these
days. It *is* a gimmick that the CE manufacturers came up with to get
people
I saw one of the large 3D home sets at Costco and once I put on the glasses,
the 3D effect was so minimal it was not worth it. Also the two images would get
ever so slightly out of sync. A very expensive gimmick. Very 3D one dot ohh. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
