--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving end feel and
know it as sarcasm with a nasty bite, one might even call it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our head-butting
discussion.
If you've realized that spending *any* time interacting
with a certain person or persons is fruitless and always
have been, you can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our head-butting
discussion.
If you've realized that spending *any* time
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our head-butting
discussion.
Whilst I hold that meditation is a good practise for winding-down and
rediscovering oneself, I doubt the promises that it automatically
makes anyone more spiritual. For that one needs to connect and relate
to the suffering and joy of others.
When did you last cry?
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've realized that spending *any* time interacting
with a certain person or persons is fruitless and always
have been, you can skip the whole process by hitting
'Next the momemnt you see their name in the
--- lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've realized that spending *any* time
interacting
with a certain person or persons is fruitless and
always
have been, you can skip the whole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whilst I hold that meditation is a good practise for winding-down and
rediscovering oneself, I doubt the promises that it automatically
makes anyone more spiritual. For that one needs to connect and relate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you've realized that spending *any* time
interacting
with a certain person or persons is fruitless and
always
have been, you can
--- braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, yes. Sorry. I forgot to state the obvious
prediction: you see rage
and anger in my post. hahaha. What else is new?
And what else is new in your denial!
Can you cite one post that pokes fun at you, or
criticizes you, in
which you don't, in YOUR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, yes. Sorry. I forgot to state the obvious
prediction: you see rage
and anger in my post. hahaha. What else is new?
And what else is new in your denial!
Can you cite
It's interesting to see that recently posters have used the
suggestion that someone might be angry as a way of attempting to
disgrace or belittle them.
It is spiritual fascism to come on like this.
Oh I should add,, IMHO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
That you find satire passive-aggressive is interesting. As asked
before,do you find all satire as such? Or just what you find to be
bad satire? Or just satire directed at you or your friends?
I'd never thought
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Again, looking at the comment that started this exchange, whats
not funny about someone proclaiming that Brahman is seing and
writing
I remember attending a social evening attended by TM meditators. I
found myself talking to one of the Muesli Mafia, a really laid-back
blissed-out sort, an example of just how wonderful one might become.
I determined to probe how deep or permanent was this equanimity,
minutes later he was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's interesting to see that recently posters have used the
suggestion that someone might be angry as a way of attempting to
disgrace or belittle them.
It is spiritual fascism to come on like this.
Oh I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
That you find satire passive-aggressive is interesting. As asked
before,do you find all satire as such? Or just what you find to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Premanand Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's interesting to see that recently posters have used the
suggestion that someone might be angry as a way of attempting to
disgrace or belittle them.
It is spiritual fascism to come on like this.
Oh I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd never thought about it before, but it seems to
me
as I read your question that satirical and
passive-
aggressive are virtually synonymous. There are
other
forms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd never thought about it before, but it seems to
me
as I read your question that satirical and
passive-
aggressive are virtually synonymous. There are
other
forms
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving end feel and
know it as sarcasm with a nasty bite, one might even call it rage.
Asking the Fox to tell you the opinions of the chickens in the chicken
house seems inappropriate. I
Judy writes snipped:
I'm not sure that was what Tom was saying anyway. I
*think* what he meant--Tom, please correct me if I'm
wrong--was simply that he has realized experientially
that Brahman is all he sees and all he says (and all
any of us see or say, wrong or right, bad or
good, the only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving end feel and
know it as sarcasm with a nasty bite, one might even call it rage.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, braaahmaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving end feel and
know it as sarcasm with a nasty bite, one might even call it
And you clearly read Unc's posts that proceeded it?
One cannot begin to understnd satire if they do not understand the
references. If you had not carefuly read Barry's campfire and related
posts, sure, the Braaahmaan post might sound a bit raw.
Just as Peter apparently had not read Unc's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I also had quite a lengthy exchange with this 'genius' where much
of what I said was scrutinized and insulted, to the point where I will
not engage him anymore.
And yet of what I read of that exchange, you never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Recently he was attempting to bully TurquoiseB, as per this
exchange:
And you can't see that the post he was responding
to was at least as bullying? And completely lacked
the overlay of humor, was just plain
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Recently he was attempting to bully TurquoiseB, as per this
exchange:
And you can't see that the post he was responding
to was
On Dec 18, 2005, at 12:40 PM, jyouells2000 wrote:
When 'they' want to attempt the ultimate put down: sexually
repressed, Republican
You mean there's a difference? :)
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Recently he was attempting to bully TurquoiseB,
Actually, I found Unc's campfire post amusing (in a good way) and
insightful, well--- entertaining at least -- a late night rift -- him
posing as if someone like curley from those billy crystal movies --
a tough weathered, few words, word and grip is lke iron, type cowboy.
Saying we all have our
It would appear IMHO that we have a person on this list who has
defined his behavior as Satire. THose on the recieving end feel and
know it as sarcasm with a nasty bite, one might even call it rage.
Asking the Fox to tell you the opinions of the chickens in the
chicken
house seems
Dear Akasha/Anon/Braaahmaan,
Hey man, I'm withdrawing from our head-butting
discussion. We've done this dance several times before
and we always end-up in the same place. There must be
somehting of value in this for us! So, I love your
serious posts. You've got a great intellect and great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 18, 2005, at 12:40 PM, jyouells2000 wrote:
When 'they' want to attempt the ultimate put down: sexually
repressed, Republican
You mean there's a difference? :)
Sal
Just another way of clouding or
Oh, yes. Sorry. I forgot to state the obvious prediction: you see rage
and anger in my post. hahaha. What else is new?
Can you cite one post that pokes fun at you, or criticizes you, in
which you don't, in YOUR EYES, see rage and anger in the poster?
Lets list the posts explicitly.
Its such a
39 matches
Mail list logo
