--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2009, at 10:24 PM, scienceofabundance wrote:
>
> > I was talking earlier today to a friend of mine who is a university
> > teacher in counseling. We were talking about last Sunday's NY Times
> > article titled "Enlightenment T
Vaj, this is interesting to me in light of my
mini-rant the other day about TM "rounding"
and the almost *expected* negative results
of it such as being "spaced out," experiencing
"heavy unstressing," etc.
I have encountered other teachers in the larger
world of meditative arts who have also war
TurquoiseB wrote:
> I'm wondering whether any of the sources you men-
> tion below talked about these issues. Thanks in
> advance...
>
Yes, they do, Turq. For example, Sogyal Rinpoche:
"So take care not to impose anything on the mind or
to tax it. When you meditate there should be no effort
to
Vaj wrote:
> What needs to happen at this point, is the
> teacher needs to awaken kundalini through
> shaktipat...
>
What needs to happen is, nothing. There is
not a single thing that an aspirant or a
teacher can do to develop awareness of the
Transcendent - not a subject of cognition.
No prac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
One must wait
> to their next birth to try again.
>
If they were given proper instruction on how to deal with this (and followed
it), why would they need to wait to the next birth to try again? Or would they?
Science
Bhairitu wrote:
> Or the teacher should have given the
> meditation technique with shaktipat
> to begin with...
>
Look, Fella, you don't exactly have a
good history of giving anyone anything,
especially instruction in meditation.
If people paid good money to learn how
to sit from you in the f
> > What needs to happen is, nothing. There is
> > not a single thing that an aspirant or a
> > teacher can do to develop awareness of the
> > Transcendent - not a subject of cognition.
> >
Vaj wrote:
> Wow, you sound really confused.
>
You just don't seem to get it, Vaj. Everytime
you apply str
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> One must wait
> > to their next birth to try again.
> >
> If they were given proper instruction on how to deal with this (and followed
> it), why would they need to
On Apr 29, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Hugo wrote:
Boy it sounds a lot harder than "unstressing" no wonder the TMO
simplifies everything.
The type of techniques to guide people beyond swooning are actually
quite easy, they just require a good guide.
But it does explain why you meet some people w
On Apr 29, 2009, at 12:18 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Vaj, this is interesting to me in light of my
mini-rant the other day about TM "rounding"
and the almost *expected* negative results
of it such as being "spaced out," experiencing
"heavy unstressing," etc.
I have encountered other teachers in the
On Apr 29, 2009, at 4:07 PM, scienceofabundance wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
One must wait
to their next birth to try again.
If they were given proper instruction on how to deal with this (and
followed it), why would they need to wait to the next birth to try
On Apr 29, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
What needs to happen at this point, is the
teacher needs to awaken kundalini through
shaktipat...
What needs to happen is, nothing. There is
not a single thing that an aspirant or a
teacher can do to develop awareness of the
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Or the teacher should have given the
>> meditation technique with shaktipat
>> to begin with...
>>
>>
> Look, Fella, you don't exactly have a
> good history of giving anyone anything,
> especially instruction in meditation.
>
>
How wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
