--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> At one point in one of Michael's diatribes at me for
> having questioned something he said, he declared that
> it was really Nature who was dumping on me; he was
> just passing on Nature's displeasure.
Michael sit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At one point in one of Michael's diatribes at me for
> having questioned something he said, he declared that
> it was really Nature who was dumping on me; he was
> just passing on Nature's displeasure.
That might be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff
> wrote:
>
> Lovely reflections anon.
>
> I confess to reading authfriend's post, albeit irregularly.
> Although thoughtful, they tend toward this unfortuna
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Lovely reflections anon.
I confess to reading authfriend's post, albeit irregularly. Although
thoughtful, they tend toward this unfortunate obsession with
intellectual cleanliness. What insight they contain is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > So there's more to it than pointing out the
> > > shortcomings of any one par
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we tolerate the participation of such people
> on this forum, though?
Correction: I should have said "such behavior." I
didn't mean to suggest such people should be prevented
from posting, or, for that matter,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > So there's more to it than pointing out the
> > shortcomings of any one particular individual. Too
> > many people simply accept what they read and h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
>
> > Just for the record, Michael has done his share of
> > "picking on" in the past--big-time, in fact. I can't
> > recall whether you were ever on TMNew
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just for the record, Michael has done his share of
> "picking on" in the past--big-time, in fact. I can't
> recall whether you were ever on TMNews or TMControversy,
> but he used to go ballistic on occasion on thos
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"I have seen him behave online in ways I
found quite repellent.
"But if you can look past the goody-goody tone of his
long dissertations, he has a real genius for
explaining MMY's teaching, I think."
"Huh, I guess we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
> Oh, hmm, you haven't read it yet, I gather.
>
> "My definition of poly is a little bigger than what a number of
> people think it is. Pol
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, hmm, you haven't read it yet, I gather.
"My definition of poly is a little bigger than what a number of
people think it is. Poly means 'many.' Amory means 'love.' We don't
say polysexuality. We don't call our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
> Michael Dean Goodman
>
> I've never met him, so I have no idea what he's like
> in person. I have seen him behave online in ways I
> fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Dean Goodman
I've never met him, so I have no idea what he's like
in person. I have seen him behave online in ways I
found quite repellent.
But if you can look past the goody-goody tone of his
long diss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Just for the record, Michael has done his share of
> > "picking on" in the past--big-time, in fact. I can't
> > recall whether you were ever on TMN
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it really gets my hackles (what is a hackle?) up.
>From Wikipedia:
"Hackles also are the hairs on the upper back and neck, especially on
dogs or wolves."
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Just for the record, Michael has done his share of
> "picking on" in the past--big-time, in fact. I can't
> recall whether you were ever on TMNews or TMControversy,
> but he used to go ballistic on occasion on tho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > Gee, Michael recently made two posts specifically
> > addressing the criticisms directed at him (and was
> > criticized for doing so!).
>
> Th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gee, Michael recently made two posts specifically
> addressing the criticisms directed at him (and was
> criticized for doing so!).
That's true, an in his larger expositions, he made indirect references
to other peopl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > It isn't just sloppiness by any means, although that's
> > certainly a factor. The major problem is his deliberate
> > disregard for accuracy and pencha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" wrote:
> > >
> > > You might not be interested in taking a writing class and
> > > learning how to really say w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" wrote:
> >
> > You might not be interested in taking a writing class and
> > learning how to really say what you want to say in a very
> > precise way, maybe that would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It isn't just sloppiness by any means, although that's
> certainly a factor. The major problem is his deliberate
> disregard for accuracy and penchant for intentional
> misrepresentation.
>
Yah, that is what I m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 3/14/06 12:04 PM, anonyff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You seem to go out of your way to provoke Judy knowing full well
that
> > if you say things a certain way it's going to cause her to respond
> > then yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Barry
>
> I've read these groups, starting with amt, going back as near as I
> can remember to the mid 90s, I know you two, and Lawson in his own
> way, have been at it for a long time.
>
> What I don't reall
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
> > > TM isn't effortless?
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might not be interested in taking a writing class and
> learning how to really say what you want to say in a very
> precise way, maybe that wouldn't suit your style, but you
> do seem very chameleonlike in your po
on 3/14/06 12:04 PM, anonyff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You seem to go out of your way to provoke Judy knowing full well that
> if you say things a certain way it's going to cause her to respond
> then you, etc.
Kinda reminds me of how I used to pick on my little sister. I knew what her
rea
Barry
I've read these groups, starting with amt, going back as near as I can
remember to the mid 90s, I know you two, and Lawson in his own way,
have been at it for a long time.
What I don't really understand is why you both choose to remain at it?
It seems to me (but what do I know) th
29 matches
Mail list logo
