[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor,

2007-11-18 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Jeez Rick, don't let any of your 'helpers' have any access to editing the archive. The FFL archive is extremely valuable for researching by any of us and anyone looking in. Don't let anyone fiddle, no matter how well meaning, with such a nice instrument. Keep the FFL archive to yourself. Tr

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread Bhairitu
authfriend wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: >> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB >>> > wrote: > It's an issue that affects only those who c

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > > It's an issue that affects only those who choose > > > to read or not to read a po

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > It's an issue that affects only those who choose > > to read or not to read a post based on its Subject > > title. > > Changing the Subject title isn't

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: > > > > I mentioned the thread hijacking which "I think" newmo > > was referring to... > > Just as something to discuss, is there any such > *thing* as "thread hi

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > > Agreed. This topic heading editor bullshit is total fucking idiocy. It > > screws up the archives, and if one participates via email, it doe

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I mentioned the thread hijacking which "I think" newmo > was referring to... Just as something to discuss, is there any such *thing* as "thread hijacking?" It's an issue that affects only those who choose to read or no

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-18 Thread Bhairitu
authfriend wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> No. He is someone else who volunteered to correct the thread >> topic when the content of the thread has morphed into something >> no longer represented by the topic. This is something we all

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > > Agreed. This topic heading editor bullshit is total fucking idiocy. It > > screws up the archives, and if one participates via email, it doesn

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Alles ist in ordnung." > > You see, already changes in titles has caused Rory to > confuse this thread with the Germany invincibility > thread! You're right. Things are still *far* too confusing and out of kon

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread gullible fool
> Alles ist in ordnung." You see, already changes in titles has caused Rory to confuse this thread with the Germany invincibility thread! --- Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Agreed. This top

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here here. > (that means 'good point' in pompous british speak) Actually, I think it's "hear, hear," if one wishes to be truly pompous :-)

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > > But to help you out, Judy, by my count you're > > > at 33 posts for the wee

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > But to help you out, Judy, by my count you're > > at 33 posts for the week already, after less > > than a day of posting. Several other people > > are

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But to help you out, Judy, by my count you're > at 33 posts for the week already, after less > than a day of posting. Several other people > are already close to "fouling out" for the > week, too, in less than a day. A

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is this person then deleting the original > > > posts? > > > > Yes. This is the only we know of to start a new > > thread in the system > > if the author does not. > > This is a mistake. You should not be del

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:32 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor Rick says he might consider raising the limit to 50. I hope so, as

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread off_world_beings
I agree, this is too confusing. but the point about changing one's title threads is a good one. OffwWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is this person then deleting the original > > > posts? > > > > Yes. This is the only we know of to

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > Have fun with your last two posts. Those of > > us with some semblance of control will try > > to have fun without you. See you next Saturday. > > > "Those who can't refrain from "fla

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread gullible fool
> > Is this person then deleting the original > > posts? > > Yes. This is the only we know of to start a new > thread in the system > if the author does not. This is a mistake. You should not be deleting valuable archives. Plus, it's difficult enough to follow threads from an email address with

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:42 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: Have fun with your last two posts. Those of us with some semblance of control will try to have fun without you. See you next Saturday. Rick says he might consider raising the limit to 50. I hope so, as I've really been enjoying Judy's contribut

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > At the very least, you should have warned > > us you were going to start this so we could > > begin keeping track of our posts by some > > other method

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread Richard J. Williams
TurquoiseB wrote: > Have fun with your last two posts. Those of > us with some semblance of control will try > to have fun without you. See you next Saturday. > "Those who can't refrain from "flaming" (personal attacks) or indulge in gratuitous profanity or sexist, racist, etc. slurs will be wa

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-18 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At the very least, you should have warned > us you were going to start this so we could > begin keeping track of our posts by some > other method than via the Yahoo Message List. > This should have been announced ahea

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ffl_topic_heading_editor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote: > > > > > > No. He is someone else who volunteered to correct the thread >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor

2007-11-17 Thread ffl_topic_heading_editor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote: > > > > No. He is someone else who volunteered to correct the thread > > topic when the content of the thread has morphed into something > > no longer repres

[FairfieldLife] Re: Who is FFL_Topic_Heading_Editor, (was Doug Henning and Vegas (was Poverty))

2007-11-17 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. He is someone else who volunteered to correct the thread > topic when the content of the thread has morphed into something > no longer represented by the topic. This is something we all > should do, but it's hard