--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
wrote:
> > >
> > > I just read most of the "deranged" thread.
> > >
> > > I avoid the politic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity wrote:
> >
> > I just read most of the "deranged" thread.
> >
> > I avoid the political discussions. These days I think most about what
> > candidate is the one
ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, my impression from reading the "deranged" thread is that teasing
> is going on by one or two of you to get a rise out of a particular
> poster. Come on now, admit it.
>
Oh yea. The two events some are really keyed into. One, when Judy
posts ou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just read most of the "deranged" thread.
>
> I avoid the political discussions. These days I think most about what
> candidate is the one my group can best work with on health care
> issues. Clinton is the most
I just read most of the "deranged" thread.
I avoid the political discussions. These days I think most about what
candidate is the one my group can best work with on health care
issues. Clinton is the most prepared and most focused on the issues.
Obama is aware of the issues and likely will have
Personally, I think that the most appropriate
response to this attempt to shift the blame for
her fuckup to someone else -- anyone else --
would be to take what she says here literally
and call her bluff.
That is, all of the remaining uncommitted
superdelegates should declare their support for
