Yes it was Shemp. The "tell all" websites indicate that it was, in the past at
least, given as
the sixth advanced technique. My feelings are mixed about those websites that
tell all and
am more than a little reticent to go into great detail. I had had 3 advanced
techniques at
that point and w
ay, February 16, 2008 4:07 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
>
>
>
> Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick?
>
> No. I was out of the TMO by that time.
>
> From what little
I got my "Bliss" technique for free. I drove my
girlfriend to his offices in Massachusetts so she
could get her technique. I sat to wait (it was
hours)and did my program. Apparently I was right next
to the room were he was giving the Bliss technique and
I heard the same technique being given out ma
I missed out completely on this whole project, Tom.
Was this a technique provided/sold under the auspices of the TMO?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My own experience was somewhat different probably due to not
getting the "3 in 1" deal
> mentioned i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Classic example of Chopra's "diasagreement" with Maharishi is
> > his description of the role of the mantra in TM found in the
> > HIstory Channel's docu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem TMO mgmt had was that many teachers were going
> > independent in order to avoid charging the new high fees for TM
> > in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> > > Chopra *disagrees* with Maha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Classic example of Chopra's "diasagreement" with Maharishi is
> his description of the role of the mantra in TM found in the
> HIstory Channel's documentary on Maharishi:
>
> "The mantra interferes with the thinking pro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Stu wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > > > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The problem TMO mgmt had was that many teachers were going
> independent in order to avoid charging the new high fees for TM
> instruction. This created a situation where people initiated into TM
> by independ
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of
Deepak
>
>
>
> Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick?
>
> No. I was out of the TMO by that time.
>
> From what little I know it sounds
> insulting to ask people to do that who have i
Looked like a shake-down to me.
- Original Message
From: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:30:20 PM
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:07 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick?
No. I
Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick? From what little I know
it sounds
insulting to ask people to do that who have initiated thousands. Was it done as
akin to a
loyalty test?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deepak never bec
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:40 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
My own experience was somewhat different probably due to not
My own experience was somewhat different probably due to not getting the "3 in
1" deal
mentioned in an earlier post. I received/purchased the "bliss" aka
"psycho-physiological"
technique during a summer assembly in DC. After opening and placing on a table
a small
pocket sized two sided pictu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "george_deforest"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> If I remember correctly, in his books Deepak was
> a proponent of positive thinking as well ...
> (M said "if a poor man repeats over and over
> I am rich, I am rich, I am rich
> that does not make h
fe@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:43:49 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Angela Mailander
wrote:
>
> Couple points:
> That the material world is an illusion
>> Interestingly enough, Stu, having been
>> around the spiritual teacher block a few
>> times in the 30 years since I last saw
>> Maharishi, I would describe *him* the
>> same way you describe Chopra. He had a
>> few introductory concepts down and he
>> spent 50 years winging it and finding
>> dif
We should not forget that Maharishi spoke of 200% value of life. I,
> for one, will be interested in the progress of the big machines
> plumbing the depths of Maya, in parallel with my own subjective
> explorations of inner reality.
We're pretty fortunate really at this time as humans. We are i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- Stu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
> > of
> > > > Maharishi's teaching.
> > >
> > > Another way of loo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> [...]
> > Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> > Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
> >
> > That does not imply that he never understood i
> TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> First, George, thank you so much for expressing your
> opinion of Chopra so clearly and so compassionately.
> I didn't feel in your post a gram of the anger and
> hostility I've been talking about feeling in some
> other recent posts about him.
well Barry, thank you for t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
>
> That does not imply that he never understood it.
>
I recall a lecture that Chopra gave where he turned apologetical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
> wrote:
> >
> > Couple points:
> > That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
> mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really
>
> Interestingly enough, Stu, having been
> around the spiritual teacher block a few
> times in the 30 years since I last saw
> Maharishi, I would describe *him* the
> same way you describe Chopra. He had a
> few introductory concepts down and he
> spent 50 years winging it and finding
> differ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Couple points:
> That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
>mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really there. Shankara
>made the term clear long before MMY by explaining that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- Stu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
> > of
> > > > Maharishi's teaching.
> > >
> > > Another way of loo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Stu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding of
> > > Maharishi's teaching.
> >
> > Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> > Chopra *disagrees* with Maha
--- Stu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
> of
> > > Maharishi's teaching.
> >
> > Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> > Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
> >
> > That doe
> > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
> > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding of
> > Maharishi's teaching.
>
> Another way of looking at it, George, is that
> Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
>
> That does not imply that he never understood it.
>
I have been to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Behalf Of authfriend
>
> Angela Mailander
> wrote:
> >
> > Couple points:
> > That the material world is an illusion was understood in the
> > popular mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really
> > the
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:49 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In HYPERLINK
"mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroup
Thanks for the clarification. I had read Shankara independently of MMY's
teaching.
- Original Message
From: authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:48:53 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another vie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Couple points:
> That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really there. Shankara
made the term clear long before MMY
MMY attributed hi
First, George, thank you so much for expressing your
opinion of Chopra so clearly and so compassionately.
I didn't feel in your post a gram of the anger and
hostility I've been talking about feeling in some
other recent posts about him. Just one comment:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ge
36 matches
Mail list logo
