Re: [FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-11 Thread doctordumbass
actually, they (koans) turn your *mind* right off (vs. brain, which needs to function to keep you breathing, etc, etc), and more precisely, your intellect, because the koan presents a pair of opposites, that cannot be easily resolved, so your mind stops whirling for a few precious seconds, and y

Re: [FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-11 Thread Share Long
Thanks for all the zen koans, Richard. They're wonderful I think. Turn my brain right off (-: On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:56 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:   That's like a zen koan: "You need a boat to cross over to the other side. But, once you cross over, you find that the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-11 Thread Richard J. Williams
That's like a zen koan: "You need a boat to cross over to the other side. But, once you cross over, you find that there is no other side and no crossing over. This being so, you would look foolish carrying a boat around on top of your head." On 12/11/2013 10:04 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard

Re: [FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-11 Thread Share Long
Richard, thanks, this is wonderful. BUT! I've heard Maharishi explain that at the deepest level of reality, Purusha IS Prakriti. On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 7:05 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:   Y.S. II. 40. "The habit of cleanliness, if it is not mechanical and ritualistic but int

Re: [FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-11 Thread Richard J. Williams
Y.S. II. 40. "The habit of cleanliness, if it is not mechanical and ritualistic but intelligent with an understanding of the nature of decaying physical organism, reveals the impure nature of the physical body: and, there arises disgust for the body and a disinclination for contact with those o

[FairfieldLife] Sid's reply to the infamous B.Mullquist!

2013-12-10 Thread cardemaister
: asaMsargaH. "B. Mullquist" wrote: > What does "asaMsargaH" really mean in Patañjali II,40: > > Shaucaat svaanga-jugupsaa parair asaMsargaH? My dear B. Mullquist, I suggest that you buy one of several commentaries on Patanjali's "ashhTaadhyaayii," and try to figure out as much as possible th