--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
> >
> > That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
> > have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
> > 300 buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > > wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > wrote:
>
> > > Besides, this PC is only 3 years old, and its 2.8GHz P4
> > > is overk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> > Besides, this PC is only 3 years old, and its 2.8GHz P4
> > is overkill for what I do. A couple years from now,
> > everything will be multiple c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
> > have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
> > 300 bucks and many
That is cool for people who want to switch. That probably covers all
the other software I use regularly like Dreamweaver and Illustrator.
But the die is cast, for better or worse, richer or poorer, I'm part
of the PC crew rolling with my Glock with my safety off.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroup
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/14/06 11:11 PM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sold my soul (if I had one) to Bill a long time ago. Now that PC
has great audio and video, I'll never know the joys of the Mac in this
life. I c
I sold my soul (if I had one) to Bill a long time ago. Now that PC
has great audio and video, I'll never know the joys of the Mac in this
life. I can do everything I want cheaper and have never had any of
the problems with viruses I hear about with my PCs. Knock on
sandalwood baby! It is the so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> "I held out as long as I could before switching from Win2000 to XP, and
> I'll probably hold out as long as I can before switching to Vista.
> After all, it's only when Microsoft starts shipping a product that
"I held out as long as I could before switching from Win2000 to XP, and
I'll probably hold out as long as I can before switching to Vista.
After all, it's only when Microsoft starts shipping a product that the
real beta testing begins, and it usually takes a couple years to weed
out the most egregi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
> have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
> 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so
> on which will surely follow
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 10/14/06 11:36 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >> That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
have to buy
> >> new Pee Cees to run it,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > and the Windows Sidebar, where it
On Oct 14, 2006, at 9:33 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: [...] and the Windows Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interfa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > [...]
> > and the Windows
> >> Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interface
> >> design),
> >
On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] and the Windows Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interface design), I'm not familiar with what is meant by "Windows side-bar". Claiming that they b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
and the Windows
> Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interface
> design),
I'm not familiar with what is meant by "Windows side-bar". Claiming that they
beat everyone
in user-interface design i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[...]
> Of course if tons of people go over to Apple, hackers will just
> eventually start writing malware for that platform as well.
>
There are fundamental differences in the design-philosophy of the Mac/NeXT and
WIndows
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Rick Archer wrote:on 10/14/06 11:36 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/14/06 11:36 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay clo
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so on which will surely follow Vista. It's said to be a fairly diffe
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so on which will surely follow Vista. It's said to be a fairly different UI that many hardcore Wintel people
--- Vaj wrote:
>
> I suspect
> with the advent of Vista, you'll see huge numbers of people coming
> back to the Mac OS
Vaj, what makes you say this? ^ Just curious.
- a happy Macintosh user forced to use Windows at the office
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
