[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Akasha 108 writes: snipped > Or maybe FFL will become Gospel, then the TMO just a faint memory. It > may be read with hushed tones in great cathedrals and temples. > > Tom T responds: > You s

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread rudra_joe
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>wrote:> I would deem FFL an excellent critical first hand> source when studying the evolution of the TMO.> > The backdrop, of cours

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread rudra_joe
: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:33 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>wrote:> I would deem FFL an excellent critical first hand> source when studying th

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread rudra_joe
d the great seer saw that then any kind of lie would be ok against that kind of utter nuclear apocalypse. - Original Message - From: peterklutz To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:02 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel

[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would deem FFL an excellent critical first hand > source when studying the evolution of the TMO. > > The backdrop, of course, is that the TMO in the future will be seen as > so much more main stream than it is to

[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread peterklutz
I didn't say it was - past is dust. But if one look at the fascination people today have with history (also obscure), I would deem FFL an excellent critical first hand source when studying the evolution of the TMO. The backdrop, of course, is that the TMO in the future will be seen as so much

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Sutphen
I don't see it as that important. I guess it's just a judgement call based on one's experience. No big woof! -Peter --- peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think there is potentiality for more thant that. > FFL does not only > belong to Fairfield, as far as I know, it's the > hear

[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread peterklutz
I think there is potentiality for more thant that. FFL does not only belong to Fairfield, as far as I know, it's the heart of discontent and discussion within the American TMO - and as in so many other things, America is at the center of it all. If I am misiformed here, please redirect me to th

[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Gospel of Judas..? > > That sounds like FFL in a few centuries (as historians > investigate the Great Transition): garulous, delirious, > blasphemous, nauseating, infuriating, hilarious, > enlightening - a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Sutphen
Oh, I believe FFL will fade into the great maw of time and never be heard of again. :) -Peter --- peterklutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Gospel of Judas..? > > That sounds like FFL in a few centuries (as > historians investigate > the Great Transition): garulous, delirious, > blasp

[FairfieldLife] Re: Controversial gospel to be translated

2005-03-30 Thread peterklutz
The Gospel of Judas..? That sounds like FFL in a few centuries (as historians investigate the Great Transition): garulous, delirious, blasphemous, nauseating, infuriating, hilarious, enlightening - a must-read. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ranigdv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ABO