Subject: [FairfieldLife] TM "grad school?"
TurquoiseB writes:What do people think? I'm
certainly interested toHear if such teachings *are* available, or
evenTheoretically available in the materials left to the
"posterity"Of the TM movement.UncTom T writes:We currently
h
on 7/12/05 12:19 PM, tomandcindytraynor at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> TurquoiseB writes:
> What do people think? I'm certainly interested to
> Hear if such teachings *are* available, or even
> Theoretically available in the materials left to the "posterity"
> Of the TM movement.
> Unc
> To
TurquoiseB writes:
What do people think? I'm certainly interested to
Hear if such teachings *are* available, or even
Theoretically available in the materials left to the "posterity"
Of the TM movement.
Unc
Tom T writes:
We currently have a weekly gathering of about 25 to 35 going on here
in
On Jun 23, 2005, at 3:54 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> To me it could imply that because of the basic dogma that
> enlightenment, once realized, is permanent and "self-
> sustaining" in that the enlightened being can "do no
> wrong," no need for such teachings is perceived.
If you dye the cloth and la
--- TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snip
>
>
> So this has me wondering whether any counterpart of
> this
> type of knowledge and teaching has appeared in the
> TM
> movement. While I was around, certainly no TM
> teacher
> had ever been trained in how to talk to someone who
> was
>
So this has me wondering whether any counterpart of thistype of
knowledge and teaching has appeared in the TMmovement. While I was
around, certainly no TM teacherhad ever been trained in how to talk to
someone who washaving enlightenment experiences. Has this
changed? Does anyone know w
Yesterday I was exchanging emails with a friend who
studies at Naropa, the school established in Boulder
by Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche. He was telling me of
the general excitement of having a visiting Buddhist
scholar who was an expert in a certain class of
Tibetan spiritual texts.
The difference
