Re: [FairfieldLife] Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher

2007-09-10 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 9/9/07 8:51:20 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let’s try this: the next time someone attacks the person rather than the points, let’s take a look at what he/she has done, see if we all agree that that’s what has happened, or whether it’s largely a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher

2007-09-09 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 9/9/07 6:02:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rick, clarify this for members: Define gratuitous profanity and also help me understand non-gratuitous profanity. I want to be able to use non-gratuitous profanity (if I deem it important) without

Re: [FairfieldLife] Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher

2007-09-09 Thread gullible fool
What about racist slurs? Is “trailer-trash” permitted but “white, trailer-trash” forbidden? “white, trailer-trash” should be forbidden if only for grammatical reasons. --- billy jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick, clarify this for members: Define gratuitous profanity and also help

RE: [FairfieldLife] Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher

2007-09-09 Thread Rick Archer
This is very well written Bill. And it highlights the main reasons I haven’t wanted to get into judging and banning FFL members. Exceeding the 35 post limit is simple to deal with; trying to define and enforce standards of decent conduct is a can of worms. Bronte and New Morning did influence my

Re: [FairfieldLife] Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher

2007-09-09 Thread Bhairitu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps we should all post proof that we have taken an Anger management course and have passed a test on Political Correctness. I think if I ever was required to take an anger management course the teacher would probably wind up killing me. :)